American Pravda: Oddities of the Jewish Religion

About a decade ago, I happened to be talking with an eminent academic scholar who had become known for his sharp criticism of Israeli policies in the Middle East and America’s strong support for them. I mentioned that I myself had come to very similar conclusions some time before, and he asked when that had happened. I told him it had been in 1982, and I think he found my answer quite surprising. I got the sense that date was decades earlier than would have been given by almost anyone else he knew.

Sometimes it is quite difficult to pinpoint when one’s world view on a contentious topic undergoes sharp transformation, but at other times it is quite easy. My own perceptions of the Middle East conflict drastically shifted during Fall 1982, and they have subsequently changed only to a far smaller extent. As some might remember, that period marked the first Israeli invasion of Lebanon, and culminated in the notorious Sabra-Shatila Massacre during which hundreds or even thousands of Palestinians were slaughtered in their refugee camps. But although those events were certainly major factors in my ideological realignment, the crucial trigger was actually a certain letter to the editor published around that same time.

A few years earlier, I had discovered The London Economist, as it was then called, and it had quickly become my favorite publication, which I religiously devoured cover-to-cover every week. And as I read the various articles about the Middle East conflict in that publication, or others such as the New York Times, the journalists occasionally included quotes from some particularly fanatic and irrational Israeli Communist named Israel Shahak, whose views seemed totally at odds with those of everyone else, and who was consequently treated as a fringe figure. Opinions that seem totally divorced from reality tend to stick in one’s mind, and it took only one or two appearances from that apparently die-hard and delusional Stalinist for me to guess that he would always take an entirely contrary position on every given issue.

In 1982 Israel Defense Minister Ariel Sharon launched his massive invasion of Lebanon using the pretext of the wounding of an Israeli diplomat in Europe at the hands of a Palestinian attacker, and the extreme nature of his action was widely condemned in the media outlets I read at the time. His motive was obviously to root out the PLO’s political and military infrastructure, which had taken hold in many of Lebanon’s large Palestinian refugee camps. But back in those days invasions of Middle Eastern countries on dubious prospects were much less common than they have subsequently become, after our recent American wars killed or displaced so many millions, and most observers were horrified by the utterly disproportionate nature of his attack and the severe destruction he was inflicted upon Israel’s neighbor, which he seemed eager to reduce to puppet status. From what I recall from that time, he made several entirely false assurances to top Reagan officials about his invasion plans, such that they afterward called him the worst sort of liar, and he ended up besieging the Lebanese capital of Beirut even though he had originally promised to limit his assault to a mere border incursion.

The Israeli siege of the PLO-controlled areas of Beirut lasted some time, and negotiations eventually resulted in the departure of the Palestinian fighters to some other Arab country. Shortly afterward, the Israelis declared that they were moving into West Beirut in order to better assure the safety of the Palestinian women and children left behind and protect them from any retribution at the hands of their Christian Falangist enemies. And around that same time, I noticed a long letter in The Economist by Shahak which seemed to me the final proof of his insanity. He claimed that it was obvious that Sharon had marched to Beirut with the intent of organizing a massacre of the Palestinians, and that this would shortly take place. When the slaughter indeed occurred not long afterward, apparently with heavy Israeli involvement and complicity, I concluded that if a crazy Communist fanatic like Shahak had been right, while apparently every mainstream journalist had been so completely wrong, my understanding of the world and the Middle East required total recalibration. Or at least that’s how I’ve always remembered those events from a distance of over thirty-five years.

During the years that followed, I still periodically saw Shahak’s statements quoted in my mainstream publications, which sometimes suggested that he was a Communist and sometimes not. Naturally enough, his ideological extremism made him a prominent opponent of the 1991 Oslo Peace Agreement between Israel and the occupied Palestinians, which was supported by every sensible person, though since Oslo ended up being entirely a failure, I couldn’t hold it too strongly against him. I stopped paying much attention to foreign policy issues during the 1990s, but I still read my New York Times every morning and would occasionally see his quotes, inevitably contrarian and irredentist.

Then the 9/11 attacks returned foreign policy and the Middle East to the absolute center of our national agenda, and I eventually read somewhere or other that Shahak had died at age 68 only a few months earlier, though I hadn’t noticed any obituary. Over the years, I’d seen some vague mention that during the previous decade he’d published a couple of stridently anti-Jewish and anti-Zionist books, just as might be expected from a hard-line Communist fanatic, and during the early 2000s I started seeing more and more references to these works, ironically coming from fringe sources of the anti-Semitic Far Right, thereby once again proving that extremists flock together. Finally, about a decade ago, my curiosity got the better of me and clicking a few buttons on, I ordered copies of his books, all of which were quite short.


My first surprise was that Shahak’s writings included introductions or glowing blurbs by some of America’s most prominent public intellectuals, including Christopher Hitchens, Gore Vidal, Noam Chomsky, and Edward Said. Praise also came from quite respectable publications such as The London Review of BooksMiddle East International, and Catholic New Times while Allan Brownfeld of The American Council for Judaism had published a very long and laudatory obituary. And I discovered that Shahak’s background was very different than I had always imagined. He had spent many years as an award-winning Chemistry professor at Hebrew University, and was actually anything but a Communist. Whereas for decades, Israel’s ruling political parties had been Socialist or Marxist, his personal doubts about Socialism had left him politically in the wilderness, while his relationship with Israel’s tiny Communist Party was solely because they were the only group willing to stand up for the basic human rights issues that were his own central focus. My casual assumptions about his views and background had been entirely in error.

Once I actually began reading his books, and considering his claims, my shock increased fifty-fold. Throughout my entire life, there have been very, very few times I have ever been so totally astonished as I was after I digested Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, whose text runs barely a hundred pages. In fact, despite his solid background in the academic sciences and the glowing testaments provided by prominent figures, I found it quite difficult to accept the reality of what I was reading. As a consequence, I paid a considerable sum to a young graduate student I knew, tasking him to verify the claims in Shahak’s books, and as far as he could tell, all of the hundreds of references he checked seemed to be accurate or at least found in other sources.

Even with all of that due diligence, I must emphasize that I cannot directly vouch for Shahak’s claims about Judaism. My own knowledge of that religion is absolutely negligible, mostly being limited to my childhood, when my grandmother occasionally managed to drag me down to services at the local synagogue, where I was seated among a mass of elderly men praying and chanting in some strange language while wearing various ritualistic cloths and religious talismans, an experience that I always found much less enjoyable than my usual Saturday morning cartoons.

Although Shahak’s books are quite short, they contain such a density of astonishing material, it would take many, many thousands of words to begin to summarize them. Essentially almost everything I had known—or thought I had known—about the religion of Judaism, at least in its zealously Orthodox traditional form, was utterly wrong.

For example, traditionally religious Jews pay little attention to most of the Old Testament, and even very learned rabbis or students who have devoted many years to intensive study may remain largely ignorant of its contents. Instead, the center of their religious world view is the Talmud, an enormously large, complex, and somewhat contradictory mass of secondary writings and commentary built up over many centuries, which is why their religious doctrine is sometimes called “Talmudic Judaism.” Among large portions of the faithful, the Talmud is supplemented by the Kabala, another large collection of accumulated writings, mostly focused on mysticism and all sorts of magic. Since these commentaries and interpretations represent the core of the religion, much of what everyone takes for granted in the Bible is considered in a very different manner.

Given the nature of the Talmudic basis of traditional Judaism and my total previous ignorance of the subject, any attempt on my part of summarize some of the more surprising aspects of Shahak’s description may be partially garbled, and is certainly worthy of correction by someone better versed in that dogma. And given that so many parts of the Talmud are highly contradictory and infused with complex mysticism, it would be impossible for someone like me to attempt to disentangle the seeming inconsistencies that I am merely repeating. I should note that although Shahak’s description of the beliefs and practices of Talmudic Judaism evoked a fire-storm of denunciations, few of those harsh critics seem to have denied his very specific claims, including the most astonishing ones, which would seem to strengthen his credibility.

On the most basic level, the religion of most traditional Jews is actually not at all monotheistic, but instead contains a wide variety of different male and female gods, having quite complex relations to each other, with these entities and their properties varying enormously among the numerous different Jewish sub-sects, depending upon which portions of the Talmud and the Kabala they place uppermost. For example, the traditional Jewish religious cry “The Lord Is One” has always been interpreted by most people to be an monotheistic affirmation, and indeed, many Jews take exactly this same view. But large numbers of other Jews believe this declaration instead refers to achievement of sexual union between the primary male and female divine entities. And most bizarrely, Jews having such radically different views see absolutely no difficulty in praying side by side, and merely interpreting their identical chants in very different fashion.

Furthermore, religious Jews apparently pray to Satan almost as readily as they pray to God, and depending upon the various rabbinical schools, the particular rituals and sacrifices they practice may be aimed at enlisting the support of the one or the other. Once again, so long as the rituals are properly followed, the Satan-worshippers and the God-worshippers get along perfectly well and consider each other equally pious Jews, merely of a slightly different tradition. One point that Shahak repeatedly emphasizes is that in traditional Judaism the nature of the ritual itself is absolutely uppermost, while the interpretation of the ritual is rather secondary. So perhaps a Jew who washes his hands three times clockwise might be horrified by another who follows a counter-clockwise direction, but whether the hand-washing were meant to honor God or to honor Satan would be hardly be a matter of much consequence.

Strangely enough, many of the traditional rituals are explicitly intended to fool or trick God or His angels or sometimes Satan, much like the mortal heroes of some Greek legend might seek to trick Zeus or Aphrodite. For example, certain prayers must be uttered in Aramaic rather than Hebrew on the grounds that holy angels apparently don’t understand the former language, and their confusion allows those verses to slip by unimpeded and take effect without divine interference.

Furthermore, since the Talmud represents a massive accretion of published commentary built up over more than a millennium, even the most explicit mandates have sometimes been transformed into their opposites. As an example, Maimonides, one of the highest rabbinical authorities, absolutely prohibited rabbis from being paid for their religious teaching, declaring that any rabbi who received a salary was an evil robber condemned to everlasting torment; yet later rabbis eventually “reinterpreted” this statement to mean something entirely different, and today almost all rabbis collect salaries.

Another fascinating aspect is that up until very recent times, the lives of religious Jews were often dominated by all sorts of highly superstitious practices, including magical charms, potions, spells, incantations, hexes, curses, and sacred talismans, with rabbis often having an important secondary role as sorcerers, and this even remains entirely true today among the enormously influential rabbis of Israel and the New York City area. Shahak’s writings had not endeared him to many of these individuals, and for years they constantly attacked him with all sorts of spells and fearful curses aimed at achieving his death or illness. Many of these traditional Jewish practices seem not entirely dissimilar to those we typically associate with African witch-doctors or Voodoo priests, and indeed, the famous legend of the Golem of Prague described the successful use of rabbinical magic to animate a giant creature built of clay.


If these ritualistic issues constituted the central features of traditional religious Judaism, we might regard it as a rather colorful and eccentric survival of ancient times. But unfortunately, there is also a far darker side, primarily involving the relationship between Jews and non-Jews, with the highly derogatory term goyimfrequently used to describe the latter. To put it bluntly, Jews have divine souls and goyim do not, being merely beasts in the shape of men. Indeed, the primary reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve as the slaves of Jews, with some very high-ranking rabbis occasionally stating this well-known fact. In 2010, Israel’s top Sephardic rabbi used his weekly sermon to declare that the only reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve Jews and do work for them. The enslavement or extermination of all non-Jews seems an ultimate implied goal of the religion.

Jewish lives have infinite value, and non-Jewish ones none at all, which has obvious policy implications. For example, in a published article a prominent Israeli rabbi explained that if a Jew needed a liver, it would be perfectly fine, and indeed obligatory, to kill an innocent Gentile and take his. Perhaps we should not be too surprised that today Israel is widely regarded as one of the world centers of organ-trafficking.

As a further illustration of the seething hatred traditional Judaism radiates towards all those of a different background, saving the life of a non-Jew is generally considered improper or even prohibited, and taking any such action on the Sabbath would be an absolute violation of religious edict. Such dogmas are certainly ironic given the widespread presence of Jews in the medical profession during recent centuries, but they came to the fore in Israel when a religiously-minded military doctor took them to heart and his position was supported by the country’s highest religious authorities.

And while religious Judaism has a decidedly negative view towards all non-Jews, Christianity in particular is regarded as a total abomination, which must be wiped from the face of the earth.

Whereas pious Muslims consider Jesus as the holy prophet of God and Muhammed’s immediate predecessor, according to the Jewish Talmud, Jesus is perhaps the vilest being who ever lived, condemned to spend eternity in the bottommost pit of Hell, immersed in a boiling vat of excrement. Religious Jews regard the Muslim Quran as just another book, though a totally mistaken one, but the Christian Bible represents purest evil, and if circumstances permit, burning Bibles is a very praiseworthy act. Pious Jews are also enjoined to always spit three times at any cross or church they encounter, and direct a curse at all Christian cemeteries. Indeed, many deeply religious Jews utter a prayer each and every day for the immediate extermination of all Christians.

Over the years prominent Israeli rabbis have sometimes publicly debated whether Jewish power has now become sufficiently great that all the Christian churches of Jerusalem, Bethleham, and other nearby areas can finally be destroyed, and the entire Holy Land completely cleansed of all traces of its Christian contamination. Some have taken this position, but most have urged prudence, arguing that Jews needed to gain some additional strength before they should take such a risky step. These days, many tens of millions of zealous Christians and especially Christian Zionists are enthusiastic advocates for Jews, Judaism, and Israel, and I strongly suspect that at least some of that enthusiasm is based upon ignorance.


For the last two thousand years, Jews have almost invariably existed as small, relatively weak minorities living in the lands of others, whether Christian or Muslim, so a religious doctrine so unswervingly hostile to outsiders has naturally presented considerable obstacles for peaceful co-existence. The solution to this dilemma has been based on the divine mandate to preserve Jewish life and well-being above all else, superseding almost all other religious considerations. Thus, if any of the behaviors discussed above are considered likely to stir up resentment from powerful Gentile groups and put Jews at risk, they must be avoided.

For example, the prohibition against Jewish physicians treating the illnesses of non-Jews is waived in the case of powerful non-Jews, especially national leaders, whose favor might provide benefits to the Jewish community. And even ordinary non-Jews may be aided unless some persuasive excuse can be found to explain such lack of assistance since otherwise the vengeful hostility of their friends and relatives might cause difficulties for other Jews. Similarly, it is permissible to exchange gifts with non-Jews but only if such behavior can be justified in strictly utilitarian terms, with any simple expression of friendship towards a non-Jew being a violation of holy principles.

If the Gentile population became aware of these Jewish religious beliefs and the behaviors they promote, major problems for Jews might develop, so an elaborate methodology of subterfuge, concealment, and dissimulation has come into being over the many centuries to minimize this possibility, especially including the mistranslation of sacred texts or the complete exclusion of crucial sections. Meanwhile, the traditional penalty for any Jew who “informs” to the authorities on any matter regarding the Jewish community has always been death, often preceded by hideous torture.

Much of this dishonesty obviously continues down to recent times since it seems very unlikely that Jewish rabbis, except perhaps for those of the most avant gardedisposition, would remain totally unaware of the fundamental tenets of the religion that they claim to lead, and Shahak is scathing toward their apparent self-serving hypocrisy, especially those who publicly express strongly liberal views. For example, according to mainstream Talmudic doctrine, black Africans are traditionally placed somewhere between people and monkeys in their intrinsic nature, and surely all rabbis, even liberal ones, would be aware of this religious doctrine. But Shahak notes that the numerous American rabbis who so eagerly worked with Martin Luther King, Jr. and other black Civil Rights leaders during the 1950s and 1960s strictly concealed their religious beliefs while denouncing American society for its cruel racism, presumably seeking to achieve a political quid pro quo beneficial to Jewish interests from America’s substantial black population.

Shahak also emphasizes the utterly totalitarian nature of traditional Jewish society, in which rabbis held the power of life and death over their congregants, and often sought to punish ideological deviation or heresy using those means. They were often outraged that this became difficult as states grew stronger and increasingly prohibited such private executions. Liberalizing rabbis were sometimes murdered and Baruch Spinoza, the famous Jewish philosopher of the Age of Reason, only survived because the Dutch authorities refused to allow his fellow Jews to kill him.


Given the complexity and exceptionally controversial nature of this subject matter, I would urge readers who find this topic of interest to spend three or four hours reading Shahak’s very short book, and then decide for themselves whether his claims seem plausible and whether I may have inadvertently misunderstood them. Aside from the copies on Amazon, the work may also be found at and also a very convenient HTML copy is freely available on the Internet.

My encounter a decade ago with Shahak’s candid description of the true doctrines of traditional Judaism was certainly one of the most world-altering revelations of my entire life. But as I gradually digested the full implications, all sorts of puzzles and disconnected facts suddenly became much more clear. There were also some remarkable ironies, and not long afterward I joked to a (Jewish) friend of mine that I’d suddenly discovered that Naziism could best be described as “Judaism for Wimps” or perhaps Judaism as practiced by Mother Teresa of Calcutta.

There may actually be a deeper historical truth behind that irony. I think I’ve read here and there that some scholars believe that Hitler may have modeled certain aspects of his racially-focused National Socialist doctrine upon the Jewish example, which really makes perfect sense. After all, he saw that despite their small numbers Jews had gained enormous power in the Soviet Union, Weimar Germany, and numerous other countries throughout Europe, partly due to their extremely strong ethnic cohesion, and he probably reasoned that his own Germanic people, being far greater in numbers and historical achievements could do even better if they adopted similar practices.

It’s also interesting to note that quite a number of the leading racialist pioneers of 19th century Europe came from a particular ethnic background. For example, my history books had always disapprovingly mentioned Germany’s Max Nordau and Italy’s Cesare Lombroso as two of the founding figures of European racism and eugenics theories, but it was only very recently that I also discovered that Nordau had also been the joint founder with Theodor Herzl of the world Zionist movement, while his major racialist treatise Degeneration, was dedicated to Lombroso, his Jewish mentor.

Even as late as the 1930s and afterward, international Zionist groups closely cooperated with the Third Reich on international economic projects, and during the world war itself one of the smaller rightwing factions, led by future Israeli Prime Minister Yizhak Shamir, actually offered a military alliance to the Axis Powers, denouncing the decadent Western democracies and hoping to cooperate against their mutual British enemies. The Transfer Agreement by Edwin Black, 51 Documents by Lenni Brenner, and other writings have documented all these facts in detail, though for obvious reasons they have generally been ignored or mischaracterized by most of our media outlets.


Obviously the Talmud is hardly regular reading among ordinary Jews these days, and I would suspect that except for the strongly Orthodox and perhaps most rabbis, barely a sliver are aware of its highly controversial teachings. But it is important to keep in mind that until just a few generations ago, almost all European Jews were deeply Orthodox, and even today I would guess that the overwhelming majority of Jewish adults had Orthodox grand-parents. Highly distinctive cultural patterns and social attitudes can easily seep into a considerably wider population, especially one that remains ignorant of the origin of those sentiments, a condition enhancing their unrecognized influence. A religion based upon the principal of “Love Thy Neighbor” may or may not be workable in practice, but a religion based upon “Hate Thy Neighbor” may be expected to have long-term cultural ripple effects that extend far beyond the direct community of the deeply pious. If nearly all Jews for a thousand or two thousand years were taught to feel a seething hatred toward all non-Jews and also developed an enormous infrastructure of cultural dishonesty to mask that attitude, it is difficult to believe that such an unfortunate history has had absolutely no consequences for our present-day world, or that of the relatively recent past.

Furthermore, Jewish hostility toward non-Jews may have often served the interests of others, and helped determine the economic role they played, especially in European countries, with this factor having been obscured by widespread ignorance of the underlying religious tenets. As most of us know from our history books, political rulers with little sympathy for their subjects sometimes restrict military power to a relatively small group of well-rewarded mercenaries, often of foreign origins so that they will have little sympathy for the population they harshly repress. I strongly suspect that some of the most common traditional economic niches of European Jews, such as tax-farming and the arrenda estate-management system of Eastern Europe, should be best understood in a similar light, with Jews being more likely to extract every last penny of value from the peasants they controlled for the benefit of their local king or lords, and their notorious antipathy for all non-Jews ensuring that such behavior was minimally tempered by any human sympathy. Thus, we should not be surprised that Jews first entered England in the train of William the Conqueror, in order to help him and his victorious Norman lords effectively exploit the subjugated Anglo-Saxon population they now ruled.

But states in which the vast majority of the population is oppressed and dominated by a thin slice of rulers and their mercenary enforcers tend to be much weaker and more brittle than those in which rulers and ruled share common interests, and I believe this is just as true for economic enforcers as for military ones. In many cases, lands reliant upon Jewish economic intermediaries, notably Poland, never successfully developed a native middle class, and often later fared quite poorly against their nationally-unified competitors. Spain was actually one of the last countries in Europe to expel its Jews, and over the next century or two reached the peak of its military and political glory. Prof. Kevin MacDonald’s controversial books on Judaism have also extensively argued that rulers who seem to have been more concerned for the well-being of their subjects also tend to be the ones more likely to be labeled “anti-Semitic” in modern history books, and his volumes are now easily available in my selection of HTML Books:

Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy
Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism

In 2009, Gene Expression blogger Razib Khan interviewed eminent evolutionary theorist David Sloan Wilson on the group selection ideas that have been his major focus. During this hour-long discussion, the theories of MacDonald became a major topic, with Wilson seeming to take them quite seriously, and pointing out that within the scientific framework “parasitism” has a simple technical definition, namely the exploitation of the large by the small. Unsurprisingly, the video record of such extremely touchy subject matter was quickly truncated to just the first 11 minutes, and eventually completely removed from both YouTube and BloggingHeadsTV. But it still at least partially survives in archived form:

In recent years, the history of Jewish expulsions from various European societies over the last thousand years has received considerable attention. The total number is somewhat disputed but almost certainly in excess of 100, with the 1930s policies of Hitler’s Germany being merely the most recent example, and Wired Magazineprovided an interesting graphical presentation of this large dataset in 2013. Given these unfortunate facts, it may be difficult to point to any other group so consistently at bitter odds with its local neighbors, and the religious details provided by Shahak certainly make this remarkable historical pattern far less inexplicable.

A very even-handed but candid description of the behavior pattern of Jewish newcomers to America was provided in a chapter of a 1914 book on immigration groups by E.A. Ross, one of America’s greatest early sociologists. Ross had been one of the towering Progressive intellectuals of his era, widely quoted by Lothrop Stoddard on the Right while still so highly regarded by the Left that he was named to the Dewey Commission to adjudicate the conflicting accusations of Trotsky and Stalin and also received glowing praise in the pages of the Communist New Masses. His dismissal on political grounds from Stanford University led to the formation of the American Association of University Professors. Yet his name had so totally vanished from our history books I had never even encountered it until beginning work on my content-archiving project, and I would not be surprised if that single chapter from one of his many books played a major role in his disappearance.

The Eastern European Hebrews

Jews spent two thousand years living as a diaspora people, and their tightly-bound trans-national colonies provided them with a uniquely effective international trading network. Since their religious traditions regarded slavery as the natural and appropriate lot of all non-Jews, both ideological and practical factors combined to apparently make them some of the leading slave-traders of Medieval Europe, though this is hardly emphasized in our histories. Closer to home, in 1991 the Black Nationalists of The Nation of Islam published The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume One, which seemed to persuasively document the enormous role Jews had played in the American slave-trade. In 1994, Harold Brackman published a short attempted rebuttal entitled Ministry of Lies under the auspices of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, but I found his denials much less compelling. I very much doubt that most Americans are aware of these historical facts.


Throughout most of my life, Nobel Laureate Alexander Solzhenitsyn was generally regarded as the greatest Russian literary figure of our modern era, and after reading all of his works, including The First CircleCancer Ward, and The Gulag Archipelago, I certainly concurred with this assertion, and eagerly absorbed Michael Scammel’s brilliant thousand page biography. Although Russian himself, many of his closest friends were Jewish, but during the 1980s and 1990s, whispers of his supposed anti-Semitism began floating around, probably because he had sometimes hinted at the very prominent role of Jews in both financing and leading the Bolshevik Revolution, and afterward staffing the NKVD and administering the Gulag labor camps. Late in his life, he wrote a massive two-volume history of the tangled relationship between Jews and Russians under the title Two Hundred Years Together, and although that work soon appeared in Russian, French, and German, nearly two decades later, no English translation has ever been authorized. His literary star seems also to greatly waned in America since that time, and I only very rarely see his name mentioned these days in any of my regular newspapers.

Samizdat versions of major sections of his final work may easily be located on the Internet, and a few years ago Amazon temporarily sold a 750 page hard copy edition, which I ordered and lightly skimmed. Everything seemed quite innocuous and factual, and nothing new jumped out at me, but perhaps the documentation of very heavy Jewish role in Communism was considered inappropriate for American audiences, as was the discussion of the extremely exploitative relationship between Jews and Slavic peasants in pre-revolutionary times, based on liquor-dealing and money-lending, which the Czars had often sought to mitigate.

When a ruling elite has limited connection to the population it controls, benevolent behavior is far less likely to occur, and those problems are magnified when that elite has a long tradition of ruthlessly extractive behavior. Enormous numbers of Russians suffered and died in the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution, and given the overwhelmingly Jewish composition of the top leadership during much of that period, it is hardly surprising that “anti-Semitism” was deemed a capital offense. Kevin MacDonald may have been the one who coined the term “hostile elite,” and discussed the unfortunate consequences when a country comes under such control.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, reborn Russia soon fell under the overwhelming domination of a small group of Oligarchs, almost entirely of Jewish background, and a decade of total misery and impoverishment for the general Russian population soon followed. But once an actual Russian named Vladimir Putin regained control, these trends reversed and the lives of Russians have enormously improved since that time. America’s media organs were overwhelmingly friendly toward Russia when it was under Jewish Oligarchic rule, while Putin has been demonized in the press more ferociously than any world leader since Hitler. Indeed, our media pundits regularly identify Putin as “the new Hitler” and I actually think the analogy might be a reasonable one, but just not in the way they intend.

Sometimes it is much easier to notice obvious patterns in a foreign country than in one’s own. In the early 2000s I read The Master Switch, a widely-praised history of modern communications technology by Columbia University professor Tim Wu, who has subsequently become a leading Internet-rights activist. I found the account fascinating, with so many stories never before known to me. However, I couldn’t help but notice that all the powerful mass-media technologies of our modern world–film, radio, and television–had been invented and pioneered by Gentiles, mostly of Anglo-Saxon origin, but in each case control was seized by ruthless Jewish businessmen, who sometimes destroyed the lives and careers of those creators. By the 1950s, nearly all of America’s leading concentrations of electronic media power—with the sole major exception of Disney Studios—were solidly in Jewish hands. In an open society such as ours, these are the central levers of political influence, and over the next generation or so, America’s long-dominant and heavily Anglo-Saxon ruling elite was replaced by a mostly Jewish one, a development I alluded to in my long Meritocracy article of a few years ago.

Critics today of all backgrounds bemoan the total impoverishment of so much of America’s once comfortably affluent middle class, noting that some sixty percent of the American population today possesses less than $500 in readily available savings. A younger generation has been reduced to permanent debt-servitude by ruinous student loans, while the the newspapers report that the opioid drug epidemic has claimed a dreadful toll in lives and family-breakdown even while Wall Street and other elite sectors of the financialized economy are richer than they have ever been before. There are certainly many different explanations for this sad economic trajectory, including technological change, growing international competition, and shifts of political power in the American system of government. But it does sometimes seem like a substantial fraction of our population has been reduced to a 21st century version of the drunken, ignorant, exploited, indebted, impoverished, and immiserated Slavic peasantry of the Jewish-dominated Pale of Settlement, and a striking graph produced by the Economic Policy Institute demonstrates that a very sharp economic inflection point occurred in the early 1970s, right around the time that the aforementioned ethnic transformation of our ruling elites was fully under way.

Contrary to widespread popular belief, it is not actually illegal to be a “Nazi” in America, nor are Nazis prohibited from owning property, even including media outlets. But suppose that the overwhelming majority of America’s major media concentrations were owned and controlled by Nazis of a particularly fanatical type. Surely that might have serious consequences for the course of our society, and especially that fraction of the population viewed with considerable disfavor under Nazi doctrine.

One important point to consider in the abbreviated history of Hitler’s Third Reich was that although the ruling Nazi elite was often quite harsh and extreme in its behavior, well over 98% of the population it ruled prior to the outbreak of war consisted of Germans, the particular group which that ruling elite most sought to benefit and uplift in all possible ways, and despite the obscuring cloud of retrospective propaganda, this goal seems to have largely been achieved. In 2004, Counterpunch published a column by the late Alexander Cockburn, its redoubtable editor, noting the tremendous success of Hitler’s peacetime economic policies, and in 2013 that same webzine carried a much longer column focused entirely on this same subject, citing the analysis of Henry C.K. Liu, whose Chinese background provided him greater critical distance. Indeed, during most of the 1930s Hitler received widespread international praise for the great success of his domestic economic and social achievements, making the cover of Time Magazine on numerous occasions and even being named its Man of the Year for 1938. By contrast, I suspect that a population that was some 98% non-German but ruled by those same fanatically pro-German leaders might have fared far worse.

Most of these disheartening facts that have so completely upended my understanding of reality over the last decade could not possibly have come to my attention until the rise of the Internet, which partially broke centralized control over the distribution of information. But many other people surely must have known large portions of this important story long before that, and recognized the very serious consequences these matters might have for the future of our society. Why has there been so little public discussion?

I believe one factor is that over the years and the decades, our dominant media organs of news and entertainment have successfully conditioned most Americans to suffer a sort of mental allergic reaction to topics sensitive to Jews, which leads to all sorts of issues being considered absolutely out of bounds. And with America’s very powerful Jewish elites thereby insulated from almost all public scrutiny, Jewish arrogance and misbehavior remain largely unchecked and can increase completely without limit.

I’ve also sometimes suggested to people that one under-emphasized aspect of a Jewish population, greatly magnifying its problematical character, is the existence of what might be considered a biological sub-morph of exceptionally fanatical individuals, always on hair-trigger alert to launch verbal and sometimes physical attacks of unprecedented fury against anyone they regard as insufficiently friendly towards Jewish interests. Every now and then, a particularly brave or foolhardy public figure challenges some off-limits topic and is almost always overwhelmed and destroyed by a veritable swarm of these fanatical Jewish attackers. Just as the painful stings of the self-sacrificing warrior caste of an ant colony can quickly teach large predators to go elsewhere, fears of provoking these “Jewish berserkers” can often severely intimidate writers or politicians, causing them to choose their words very carefully or even completely avoid discussing certain controversial subjects, thereby greatly benefiting Jewish interests as a whole. And the more such influential people are thus intimidated into avoiding a particular topic, the more that topic is perceived as strictly taboo, and avoided by everyone else as well.

For example, about a dozen years ago I was having lunch with an especially eminent Neoconservative scholar with whom I’d become a little friendly. We were bemoaning the overwhelmingly leftward skew among America’s intellectual elites, and I suggested it largely seemed a function of our most elite universities. Many of our brightest students from across the nation entered Harvard and the other Ivies holding a variety of different ideological perspectives, but after four years departed those halls of learning overwhelmingly in left-liberal lock-step. Although he agreed with my assessment, he felt I was missing something important. He nervously glanced to both sides, shifted his head downward, and lowered his voice. “It’s the Jews,” he said.


I do not doubt that much of the candid analysis provided above will be quite distressing to many individuals. Indeed, some may believe that such material far exceeds the boundaries of mere “anti-Semitism” and easily crosses the threshold into constituting an actual “blood libel” against the Jewish people. That extremely harsh accusation, widely used by stalwart defenders of Israeli behavior, refers to the notorious Christian superstition, prevalent throughout most of the Middle Ages and even into more modern times, that Jews sometimes kidnapped small Christian children in order to drain their blood for use in various magic rituals, especially in connection with the Purim religious holiday. One of my more shocking discoveries of the last dozen years is that there is a fairly strong likelihood that these seemingly impossible beliefs were actually true.

I personally have no professional expertise whatsoever in Jewish ritual traditions, nor the practices of Medieval Jewry. But one of the world’s foremost scholars in that field is Ariel Toaff, professor of Jewish Renaissance and Medieval Studies at Bar-Ilan University near Tel Aviv, and himself the son of the Chief Rabbi of Rome.

In 2007, he published the Italian edition of his academic study Blood Passovers, based on many years of diligent research, assisted by his graduate students and guided by the suggestions of his various academic colleagues, with the initial print run of 1,000 copies selling out on the first day. Given Toaff’s international eminence and such enormous interest, further international distribution, including an English edition by a prestigious American academic press would normally have followed. But the ADL and various other Jewish-activist groups regarded such a possibility with extreme disfavor, and although these activists lacked any scholarly credentials, they apparently applied sufficient pressure to cancel all additional publication. Although Prof. Toaff initially attempted to stand his ground in stubborn fashion, he soon took the same course as Galileo, and his apologies naturally became the basis of the always-unreliable Wikipedia entry on the topic.

Eventually, an English translation of his text turned up on the Internet in a PDF format and was also placed for sale on, where I purchased a copy and eventually read it. Given those difficult circumstances, this work of 500 pages is hardly in ideal form, with most of the hundreds of footnotes disconnected from the text, but it still provides a reasonable means of evaluating Toaff’s controversial thesis, at least from a layman’s perspective. He certainly seems an extremely erudite scholar, drawing heavily upon the secondary literature in English, French, German, and Italian, as well as the original documentary sources in Latin, Medieval Latin, Hebrew, and Yiddish. Indeed, despite the shocking nature of the subject matter, this scholarly work is actually rather dry and somewhat dull, with very long digressions regarding the particular intrigues of various obscure Medieval Jews. My own total lack of expertise in these areas must be emphasized, but overall I thought Toaff made a quite persuasive case.

It appears that a considerable number of Ashkenazi Jews traditionally regarded Christian blood as having powerful magical properties and considered it a very valuable component of certain important ritual observances at particular religious holidays. Obviously, obtaining such blood in large amounts was fraught with considerable risk, which greatly enhanced its monetary value, and the trade in the vials of this commodity seems to have been widely practiced. Toaff notes that since the detailed descriptions of the Jewish ritualistic murder practices are very similarly described in locations widely separated by geography, language, culture, and time period, they are almost certainly independent observations of the same rite. Furthermore, he notes that when accused Jews were caught and questioned, they often correctly described obscure religious rituals which could not possibly have been known to their Gentile interrogators, who often garbled minor details. Thus, these confessions were very unlikely to have been concocted by the authorities.

Furthermore, as extensively discussed by Shahak, the world-view of traditional Judaism did involve a very widespread emphasis on magical rituals, spells, charms, and similar things, providing a context in which ritualistic murder and human sacrifice would hardly be totally unexpected.

Obviously, the ritual murder of Christian children for their blood was viewed with enormous disfavor by the local Gentile population, and the widespread belief in its existence remained a source of bitter tension between the two communities, flaring up occasionally when a Christian child mysteriously disappeared at a particular time of year, or when a body was found that exhibited suspicious types of wounds or showed a strange loss of blood. Every now and then, a particular case would reach public prominence, often leading to a political test of strength between Jewish and anti-Jewish groups. During the mid-19th century, there was one such famous case in French-dominated Syria, and just before the outbreak of the First World War, Russia was wracked by a similar political conflict in the 1913 Beilis Affair in the Ukraine.

I first encountered these very surprising ideas almost a dozen years ago in a long article by Israel Shamir that was referenced in Counterpunch, and this would definitely be worth reading as an overall summary, together with a couple of his follow-up columns, while writer Andrew Hamilton offers the most recent 2012 overview of the controversy. Shamir also helpfully provides a free copy of the book in PDF form, an updated version with the footnotes properly noted in the text. Anyway, I lack the expertise to effectively judge the likelihood of the Toaff Hypothesis, so I would invite those interested to read Toaff’s book or better yet the related articles and decide for themselves.


The notion that the world is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine has often been misattributed to the British astronomer Sir Arthur Eddington, and over the last fifteen-odd years I’ve sometimes begun to believe that the historical events of our own era could be considered in a similar light. I’ve also sometimes joked with my friends that when the true history of our last one hundred years is finally written and told—probably by a Chinese professor at a Chinese university—none of the students in his lecture hall will ever believe a word of it.

Related Readings:


Komentari na prvi clanak! #1-#60.....


Hide 1649 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments? 
  1. Wally says:

    A search of CODOH (Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust), the world’s leading ‘holocaust’ Revisionist publisher, website, and source of information concerning scholarly research proving the fraudulence of the ‘holocaust’ narrative yields forty-one results when searching Israel Shahak.


    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ debunked here:
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

  2. Dan Hayes says:

    Mr. Unz:

    All I can say is WOW! With this essay you’ve really let it all hang out and thrown down the gauntlet.

    I would ordinarily give zero or less as the political survival chances for anyone else writing anything like this. But somehow or other through earned wealth, political brazenness, or just plain unmitigated good fortune I feel/hope that you and the UR will both continue and prosper.

    • Replies: @Anonymous@Wally@Svigor
  3. Polymath says:

    Not having time at the moment, I make no judgment on the validity of Unz’s findings, but I predict that a very strong reaction will arrive soon, and I trust Ron has made adequate technical preparations.

    • Replies: @Wally
  4. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    There is one authenticated child sacrificed by Jews. It’s the child Saint Hugo of Lincoln disappeared and found dead and drained of blood near Lincoln England in the 1200.

    There was also a N. Italian boy in the 1500s

    The mid 19th century Syrian was an adult, a Christian monk.

    Affirmative action is a Jewish war against the White goyim. The majority of attorneys on the anti White side of the affirmative action law suits have Jewish names. Same with the civil rights criminal attorneys that have made the once great cities crime ridden ghettoes.

    Re: employment, Whites are untouchables. It’s amazing the number of government agencies at all levels whose only function is to ensure that Whites aren’t hired for any job.

    It’s ny opinion that we goyim should be grateful American Jews haven’t yet done to us what they did to Russians 1918 to 1950? And what they’re doing to Palestinians now.

    Having personally known some Jewish weather underground and other radicals I know how much they hate us.

    I found Dr Macdonald’s trilogy in the university library where I worked. Having spent a lifetime around the Jewish old left and new left, nothing in those books was new to me.

    It was because of the Jewish tax collectors that Poland was partitioned between Russia Austria and Prussia. They kept so much of the tax money for themselves there was no money for either an army or any kind of diplomatic service.

  5. Colin Wright says: • Website

    My. Well, offhand, I imagine my reaction will lie somewhere midway between the uncritical applause of the anti-semite brigade and the shocked denunciations of the guardians of political orthodxy.

    The comments I’m about to post are more or less haphazard. I merely wish to emphasize that I actually agree with most of what I read; I’m listing my points of dissent, not my points of agreement.

    First off, it’s an exaggeration — and a self-defeating one — to say that the Russian Communists were ‘overwhelmingly’ Jewish. Disproportionately, certainly, and indeed, heavily, but not ‘overwhelmingly.’ Perhaps a third of the prominent figures were Jewish. Have half. The point is that Communism, while heavily Jewish, was also gentile.

    Second, the article gives the impression that there is some some kind of monolithic Judaism. That’s obviously untrue: Jews are some of the most quarrelsome, dissent-prone folks around. The author is actually more representative of the average Jewish intellectual than he may think. Indeed, this compulsion to dissent — rather than some sinister urge to reduce the goyim to misery — may do much to explain the attraction revolutionary creeds hold for Jews.

    I’ll also note that the monolithic Judaism paradigm fails in the face of the enormous intermarriage rate among Jewish men. If there is a Jewish plot, a good half of Jewish men are completely failing to do their duty.

    So that’s about it. Revisionism — of all kinds — is good and useful. However, it usually goes too far. If the Jew as immaculately innocent and eternal victim paradigm is obviously inaccurate, it doesn’t follow that the exact opposite must be the case.

    If it wasn’t for Israel, I’d actually have no problem with Jews. I found myself confronting this when I decided to buy a camera from B&H Camera. I realized the firm is owned by Satmar Jews, who think that when the Messiah comes, all the bad gentiles will go to hell while all the good gentiles will be the slaves of Jews for all eternity.

    I thought about that for a bit, and eventually came to the conclusion that while their sentiment is hardly friendly, when the Messiah comes, we’ll find out if they’re right. In the meantime, they offer some excellent prices on cameras.

    • Agree: Jus' Sayin'...
  6. DB Cooper says:

    I heard years ago that Christianity is so despise in Israel that in school the students are taught to write the arithmetic plus sign as the letter “t” rather than “+” because the “+” sign resembles the Christianity cross.

  7. Colin Wright says: • Website

    As a separate note, I’d add the works of a professor Klier to the reading list. He’s a Cambridge academic who’s produced some careful research on Jews in nineteenth century Russia and the actual nature and course of the various pogroms on which so much Jewish victimology rests. Certainly the evil anti-semitic Tsars and their officials emerge as much more ambiguous figures than the usual narrative would have us believe.

    • Replies: @Hans
  8. Rational says:


    Sir, you have written one of the best articles I have read in years! Great work! It takes a great man to speak with such honesty like you have, in this day and age.

    Israel Shahak was truly a great man. His excellent book “Jewish History, Jewish Religion” belongs in every intellectual’s book shelf. I recommend your article and his book to everybody.

    I thank you again.

  9. It is worth noting in the Bible how prevalent the mention of both animal and human sacrifice is. It is also noteworthy how many ancient Jewish customs and rituals, starting with male circumcision mentioned in Genesis, are still adhered to today with pride by modern-day Jews. To dismiss any mention of the possibility of human blood ritual sacrifice without even entertaining the relevant facts bespeaks a conditioning by both Jews and non-Jews that simply will not entertain the possibility of it being true.

    The term thug is derived from the Hindi word thugee, a member of a religious sect that existed for centuries in India strangling travellers in their sleep after gaining their confidence. When the Thugs were finally broken up by the British authorities in the 19th century, they protested that they were merely serving the great goddess Kali and her need for sacrifcial victims. Who were they, mere mortals, to deny her her sacred rite right? They were merely being good devout Thugs.

    You’ve got to give Jews credit for one thing. They think BIG. Wheras the Thugs merely killed small bands of pilgrims, Jews do the same thing on a national scale.

  10. Reading this I’m reminded of the Far Side cartoon that shows a psychiatrist writing on his note pad his assessment of a patient who is blabbering on and on about his life. The notes read: “Just plain nuts.”

  11. utu says:

    On Saturday I tried to tell a friend about who was Ron Unz and about his Weltanschauung evolution. Then on Sunday for reason now I do not remember I began to think of Bobby Fischer and his evolution that eventually lead to the asylum he got in Iceland. And I began to fear for Ron Unz’s future and safety. Was he on a similar path?

    Several hours later this article was posted.

    • Replies: @Anonymous@iffen@annamaria
  12. anon[149] • Disclaimer says:

    I’ve just been called a Nazi and kicked out of the Atheist Conservative facebook group for posting this, calling it fascinating and asking what the administrator thinks.

    • Replies: @Wally
  13. Well that was as fascinating as it was morbid. As usual, thank you for sharing. You’re doing (Christian) God’s work!

    Synagogue of Satan confirmed!

    Adding further credibility to the notion that Christianity was created as an anti-Jewish weapon. I watched a vid on YouTube some time ago between Kevin McDonald and… I want to say David Duke? But they were getting in to that theory quite a bit.

    Though, all things considered, the modern day implications of this article only make me wish I really could rely on a holy savior descending from the sky to rescue us from such an incomprehensible evil.

    Reminds me of the spirit cooking thing with Podesta from the 2016 election cycle. And the #PizzaGate thing. That video of the after hours event they were holding in that pizza shop still gives me the creeps.

    I often refer to people these days as cattle, for obvious reasons. But thinking about what I read here in the context of modern times…. how soul crushing it is even just to consider that we may..probably are.. quite literally be cattle for these people.

    I think I see the farm. But how do I leave it?

    Ehh… I really shoulda saved this read for the morning…

    • Replies: @Anonymous@Hapalong Cassidy
  14. Thanks to Ron for summarizing this obscure material, and his bravery and honesty in writing about it.

    What have we learned here? That European Jews, in the Christian period between antiquity and modernity, often dwelled in superstitious and tightly controlled communities, hostile to outsiders. That on several occasions, perhaps even repeatedly, they became exploitative agents of a local ruling class, alienated from the common people. That despite the secularism and reformism that dominates the modern Jewish community, the superstitious tribalism survives as an element in the political life of the nation-state of Israel, and the rapacious economic practices as an element in the business life of modern America. That’s my instant synopsis.

    • Replies: @Jake@jilles dykstra@Mr. Anon
  15. A few typos I picked up:

    “One or the one” should probably be “one or the other.”

    “Discontented facts” should probably be “disconnected facts.”

    “Lenni Brunner” should be Lenni Brenner.


    All in all, I found this a solid summary of some interesting but obscure factual claims. I think it was somewhat irresponsible not include a discussion of just how widespread such beliefs, attitudes and practices are among Jews today. Without such a discussion, I fear too much of the commentary will be about how ‘anti-semitic’ the essay is, rather than how accurate it is.

    • Replies: @rjl@Anon
  16. Blood Passover is made more believable generally by consideration of the entirely authority plus faith based persecution of non existent witches. Great Britain had become quite moderate until James 1′s experience in Denmark when he was James VI of Scotland picking up his bride turned him into a scholar of Demonologie and, despite his son Charles 1 putting a damper on witchhunting it took off during the civil war about 1645 and led to the killing of hundreds of witches over the next hundred years. Local villagers were often the accusers for pecuniary or other malign motives and de facto circumvention of legal restrictions on torture were common. Not the same obviously but it makes belief in almost any primitive practices quite credible.

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
  17. Ron, as a Jew raised in the Reform tradition, I can’t speak to the claims about Talmudic Judaism. But your claims that “our media pundits regularly identify Putin as ‘the new Hitler’” seems largely untrue. A quick Google search on “the new Hitler” turns up only 70,000 results, links that refer mostly to Saddam Hussain, various Iranian leaders, and Trump. A search for “the new Hitler” and “Putin” turns up only 17,000 results and from what I can tell many of the linked stories criticize the formulation. Can you point to even two or three significant pundits who have called Putin “the new Hitler”?

    I’m also no expert on the subject of Hitler’s economic policies, but I recall from an undergraduate history course that Hitler revived the German economy through massive deficit spending, budgets predicated on the coming wartime plunder. Citing “the tremendous success of Hitler’s peacetime economic policies” is like citing the tremendous success of the US occupation of Iraq in 2003. It’s true as far as it goes, but it doesn’t go very far.

    As to all the claims about pre-modern Judaism, I can’t say, but many of the practices and superstitions you cite don’t seem very different from contemporaneous Christianity. And your dark musings on the lasting impact of the alleged centuries of inculcated “seething hatred” for Christians doesn’t jibe particularly well with the Jewish intermarriage rate, an actual verifiable statistic that’s conspicuous in its absence.

    • Agree: annamaria
    • Disagree: L.K
  18. You are a good, brave and rare man, Ron Unz.

    • Agree: Pat Kittle
    • Replies: @densa@Moi@anonymous
  19. Biff says:
  20. bossel says:

    Not really. Watching it there right now. Length 65:49.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  21. Sloopyjoe says:

    Thank you Mr. Unz for your hard work in putting this article together. I’m glad you had mentioned the Organ Harvesting Disease that infects Jewish Voodoo Practices, The Jewish role in the Black Slave Trade, and the physical spitting upon Christians by Jews. These topics are rarely mentioned today due to the suppressive nature of Jewish Media control and the bought off USSA/Western Politicos. Another Oddity of the Jewish Religion (only naughty and consistently problematic creatures need to have 613 Commandments):


    I would like to take the readers on a little journey a bit further back in time in regards to the origination of the Jewish Religion, as well as, Christianity and Islam. First a short video:

    Here is the article and Author from which this originates ( I would encourage the readers to read the other well researched and very enlightening articles by scholar, Ashraf Ezzat):

    And another by John Kaminski:

    The understanding of the above information has PROFOUND implications on the above three religions. Most will deny and scurry off into their “Safe Spaces” while continuing to live in the “Blue Pill” world and deserve to be scolded by The Wise Prophet, Mr. T: The few that have retained a spine and a desire for accurate historical truths will be on their way to the “Red Pill” world and out of the Matrix Mind Control Mechanisms. Similar to 9-11. If one major part of the story stinks, then the rest stinks. Simple.

    Some sagely wisdom from Comedian George Carlin RIP (I would rename the video Organized Religions are Bullsh*t):

    The revisionist history practices and manipulative nature of the Jews (real and fake) are easily verified by any who have eyes to see and minds to think.

    Free your mind and your arse will follow.

    • Replies: @Wally@Jared Eliot
  22. mark green says:

    This was an extraordinary article. Thank you, Ron Unz. Warning: you are being monitored, Ron, around the clock (of course you already know this).

    This just in:

    The International Coalition Against Anti-Semitsm and White Supremacy (ICAAWS) wants shut down and Ron Unz held responsible for the ‘disturbing’ rise in anti-Semitic hate crimes and unprovoked attacks upon innocent Jews around the world. It’s reaching epidemic proportions!

    Actually, this hysterical malarkey is not exactly true. Ron’s not facing any lawsuits or indictments (yet) and the organization above does not exist (at least as far as I know). But there are dozens of similar-sounding organizations which do. And they’re deadly serious about “stopping the hate”–even in online discussions where Jewish conduct is criticized and where remarkable disclosures concerning Jewish history and ‘beliefs’ are revealed.

    Ron: You are trafficking in blood libels!

    This part is true: at this moment, scores of Jewish scholars, attorneys, lobbyists, activists, intellectuals, ‘philanthropists’, political experts and media operatives are working feverishly and cooperatively to impose limits on political speech and even draft legislation that will criminalize and eventually eradicate the global ‘scourge’ of anti-Semitism. This includes you, dear reader. You’ve got the disease!

    That’s how the official story might read, anyway.

    But let’s not kid ourselves. Jews do have a problem.

    No matter how collectively powerful, accomplished, secure, connected and wealthy they become, the chosen people are constantly aspiring for more. More!

    As the Torah instructs, they must ‘rule the nations’ (all of them).

    More land, more prestige, more wealth, more glory. Even more shiksas! (As Harvey W. knows).

    This unquenchable appetite of theirs invariably spills over and into neighboring cultures, populations and states. Jews may be small in number but their footprint is large. Very large. Thus ‘anti-Semitism’. And to make matters worse, their ‘religion’ is a hodge-podge of macabre superstitions, outright satanism, and supreme self-worship. This makes them less-than-ideal neighbors.

    I can only imagine the intense interest and ‘outrage’ (one of their favorite words) felt by world’s foremost deceivers, hypocrites, self-deceivers when they read an article like this, Mr. Unz. Like Shahak, you are telling the truth as you find it. And that makes them mad. Very mad.

    Don’t you dare say that!

    Unvarnished disclosures can nourish ‘anti-Semitism’! And mere truth is no defense.

    Jewish safety (and Jewish souls) are just too damn important. Kosher taboos must therefore be observed. And obeyed.

    This is why the chosen people have become the world’s foremost censors. Unfettered discourse and unobstructed scholarship jeopardizes their precious Narrative (just as it threatens the official Holocaust yarn). So shut up. Free Speech has its limits.

    (((They))) will tell you just what those limits are once you’ve violated them. Be careful. Tread lightly.

    Indeed, I do recall seeing as small article about Toaff’s provocative book (this was well over 20 years ago) in a local SF newspaper that indicated that “political pressures” forced its ‘cancellation’.

    Decades earlier, a Japanese writer (whose name I do not recall) attempted to publish a book in Japan that posited the view that Jews controlled the Western world. This book too never saw the light of day. Even Japan (way over yonder) was brought to heel by the (((guardians of discourse))).

    And I also distinctly remember the article (and photo) that also appeared decades ago in the SF Chronicle which described the incident where revisionist historian, David Irving, was physically attacked in an auditorium at Cal Berkeley (home of America’s ‘legendary’ Free Speech movement) for being a ‘Nazi apologist’. Yet there was no public ‘outrage’ over the politically-driven, physical attack upon a scholar speaking in Berkeley. None.

    Irving ‘deserved’ it.

    The always-protesting Left had nothing to say (or if they did, it went unrecorded) about this frontal assault on intellectual freedom at Berkeley. Gee. Odd.

    The ACLU was AWOL. No professors came to Irving’s defense. To quote a cliche adored by the vociferous Left: ‘the silence was deafening’.

    And throughout the mainstream press at that time, there was no defense of Mr. Irving’s right to discuss his book (‘Hitler’s War’) at Berkeley; nor was there any kind of counter-protest at Berkeley to defend Irving’s clear, constitutionally-guaranteed right to address an audience in an academic setting. None.

    What’s wrong with this picture?

    And it happened at Berkeley.

    The totalitarian (((Left))) rules the academy as well as our news institutions. And that’s not all.

    Thankfully, we now have a free and gloriously open internet. The marketplace of ideas has arrived.
    But I lived through an era when all we had was (((mainstream))) news and prime time entertainment. America was even more zombified then than now.

    Nevertheless, Americans still live under a soft occupation. We are allowed (encouraged) to get obnoxiously and deliriously excited over a football game. One may also champion this Democrat candidate over that Republican one (or visa-versa)– but Americans are not really allowed to stray too far from the contrived ‘center’ of our culture’s political ‘center’. This violation of standards is what the ‘far right’ does. And it makes them ‘extreme’.

    So America’s political center has been given a loose definition. It includes the global security state, Zio-Washington’s global military empire, our two-Party duopoly, Russia-phobia, Iran-phobia, Hamas-phobia, political protocols which undermine white cohesion, as well the ‘unshakable’ commitment to virtually all political objectives sought by the Zionist state.

    Sometimes reality is indeed stranger than fiction.

    • Agree: Cloak And Dagger
    • Replies: @36 ulster@Svigor
  23. Wow explosive stuff Ron, the tribe will come for you.

    In keeping with the spirit of the essay, new Jim Crow legislation’s being proposed in Israel. Imagine the outrage if it were done in the US.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  24. Ron,

    above you link to your Meritocracy article on Asian vs Jewish vs white (Gentile) admission at Harvard.

    Did you ever answer Nurit Baytch’s analysis that appeared to refute your article’s claims of absurd Jewish overrepresentation at Harvard?

    In addition, are you aware that later, after Baytch’s did her calculations, some of the annual Harvard Crimson surveys of incoming freshmen and graduating seniors give the number of self-reported Jewish whites at Harvard, and the number is much lower than what you stated in your Meritocracy article?

    As far as I can tell you were completely wrong about the level of Jewish representation at Harvard. Your accusations of Jewish admissions favoritism (the Protocols of the Elders of Harvard Square) are astonishing, very damning if true, and got very wide circulation on the internet. Yet there is no record (that I could find) of any substantive response from you to Baytch or any indication that you are even aware of the Jewish data in the Crimson surveys.

    So: did you (or anyone else) answer Baytch or address the data from the Harvard Crimson?

    • Replies: @mcohen@Anon@D. K.@Ron Unz@FKA Max@bj
  25. mcohen says:

    At first I was outraged by this article then I had to unbuckle a chuckle.I am disappointed that you never brought up the love amongst certain Jewish sects of chopped liver.

    “And with America’s very powerful Jewish elites thereby insulated from almost all public scrutiny, Jewish arrogance and misbehavior remain largely unchecked and can increase completely without limit.”

    a sliver of liver,a crown for the clown,in the kings court,all will turn to nought.

    • Replies: @Anon@druid
  26. llloyd says: • Website

    Jesus. You went the whole hog. The last sentence is a master stroke. Chinese culture has no developed sense of good and therefore no developed sense of evil. It’s all about harmony. The rulers of heaven above bringing down tranquillity below.

    • Replies: @Ace
  27. utu says:

    The first time I have encountered the idea that Nazism emulated Judaism was in Umberto Eco’s essay in a niche art journal. Recently I tried to locate it bu I failed. That I do not reminder the name of the journal does not help.

    It is interesting that a Polish historian wrote about Nazism as an emulation of Judaism already before the WWII and then in underground publications during the WWII in Poland. He worked on his Jewish Civilization before the WWII which finished right after the war. It has been published since in Polish but for obvious reasons not widely know. Supposedly an English translation from a small publishing house in Poland is available:

    Koneczny is more known for his 1935 “On the Plurality of Civilsations.” Here reviewed by Carroll Quigley

    and here the whole book in English with a preface by Arnold Toynbee

    An this is from fairly recent critical article about Koneczny’s Jewish CIvilazation and his raising popularity among nationalists in Poland:

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra@Mr. Anon
  28. Anonymous[423] • Disclaimer says:

    Amazing article. Bravo.

  29. Ron seems to be perilously hovering on the edge of a social abyss – i.e. Holocaust revisionism. Join us Ron it’s the logical endpoint of this particular journey.

    • Agree: International Jew
    • Replies: @Wally
  30. utu says:

    Feliks Koneczny (1940s during the WWII): Judaized Hitlerism (excerpts)
    Polis version:

    In Germany, Jews are being attacked, but their ideology is being adopted. The foundations of Nazism are drawn from Jewish civilization. The first (as far as I know) realized in this K.L. Koniński, writing in 1933 about the chosen nation and the chosen race: “How similar to the Jews who are hated are these anti-Semites!.” The civilization activity of both Russian and German societies combines in the fight against Christianity. From the sickle and the hammer, the more obvious sign of anti-Christian tendencies is the broken cross (this is the hackenkreuz). In Russia,all religion are fundamentally destroyed, they do not want any and none, while the Germans decided to create their own religion. Hitler did not think of this at first; it is Josephism mutatis mutandis. Joseph II bred his Catholicism in his own way, because he believed that religion could be very useful to the state; he wanted to make the Church a first-class politician for his use. Also Hitler. The dreams of your own religion have been dating back to Germany since the days of Fichte, and for a hundred years they have been thinking about creating their entire civilization. Attempts to date have been miscarried, because civilization can not be “done”; by no means it will be created artificially, a priori.

    Jews brought monolatry to Europe and we know it from them, and in general we consider it something specifically Jewish. It is not so; monolatry is a phenomenon repeated in universal history here and there in various parts of the world, it can therefore be diverse and Germany could (in principle) think of a new, specifically German monolatry. They did not make this so. The Hitlerian monolatry is a faithful copy of the Jewish one, for it accepts the Jewish concept of the relation of its god to people without reservation. Just like Jehovah, the deutsche Gott is the enemy of all mankind, with the exception of Jews or Germans, Jews are the chosen people, and the German word Herrenvolk means the same; For Jewish choice has the message to rule over the whole world, and Germany strives to the same, under the authority of the deutschen Gottes and under his protection. The goal will undoubtedly be achieved, because the German God is invincible. When the incomparable (for Germans) coincident failed the first universal war, the second one provoked; if it should fail, it will evoke the third, etc. Until the effect. Similarly, Jews believe that world domination can not pass them.

    Their contempt of strangers they had learned from the Jews, as if they were reciting a lesson from the Talmud; they also equated themselves with Jews in maximum hatred. Jews are similar in that pride without measure is the most striking feature of both. In truth, a Jew is a complete man, only a Jew for a Jew, only a German for a German. A simple consequence of being chosen!

    The Germans completed the biblical verse as fully as possible with the promise of Jehovah, who will give Israel “a great and good city that you have not built; at the same time, the houses full of the good of all you did not clean up and the wells dug that you did not dig; vineyards and olive trees that you did not plant – and you will eat and eat “. The situation is exactly the same with the Germans. To desire of someone else’s property has become an essential feature of their character and the axis of their history. They work to have what they want to lead a war of invaders and a robbery invasion, then to live at the expense of others, fruges consumere nati.

    The civilization that is currently being carried by the Germans is to be based on slavery. Jews also dream about it, that when the Messiah comes, he will turn the “nations” into the slaves of Israel. The Germans made this dream a reality, they turned it into reality. They are more radical than Jews. It is hard to think that this system of the “new Europe” is progress.

    Having written down the manifestations of the latest German culture, we see that it is to be strictly utilitarian. Generally, this trait is also characteristic of Jews, but for Germans to a higher degree. Jews cease to be utilitarians when it comes to the worship of Jehovah and the study of the holy books. The Jew is now ready to make great sacrifices. There is nothing sacred in Nazism. They went through Jewish and Chinese in utilitarianism.

    In matters of property of the “nations”, the German position is quite compatible with the Talmud. Quite Jewishly, Germans also consider all property conquered as a “desert”, or a “free lake”, on which the Germans are allowed to do what he likes. Whether for a Jew or for a German, the property of “strangers” is nevertheless res nullius and primi occupantis of a Jew or a German.

    They strictly and thoroughly took over from the Jews the command of a double ethic, different for their fellow believers, and for different gentiles, which consisted of exemption from all ethics. This comes from the explicit command of Jehovah and the German god. The whole Europe knows from experience, not only is German allowed to commit all this evil, so that German has no conscience only but also no honor in relation to strangers, but unfriendly and dishonorable conduct is directly recommended to them. If German does not commit wickedness towards a stranger, apparently he is not a Nazi in spirit; like a Jew, without thinking of anything bad for a goy, he becomes a Jew who has been de-Judaized.

    • Replies: @Wally
  31. Tyrion 2 says: • Website

    Ron, I don’t know if you’ve drunk your own koolaid or if this is some sort of bizarre grand experiment in creating a deranged and lunatic cult.

    There’s a certain paint by numbers feel to the article that is plainly contrived. The oscillating hot/cold and reasonable/unreasonable tone is the type of manipulation that I am sensitive to seeing, and reacting against.

    Regardless, from the point at which you say that the Talmud takes precendence to the written Torah (Old Testament), you’ve already jumped into fantasy land.

    For example, the entire Torah is read out in services every year. The Talmud is not. It is instead a millenia old vast Jewish Wikipedia in which the most controversial stuff would be found in the commentson edits, the comments on comments on edits and so on and so on and so on.

    Were an alien to browse the internet message boards as you may have browsed the Talmud, they would make all sorts of unreal conclusions.

    I suspect that indeed the huge swelling in third world anti-Western resentment pre-9/11 may actually have been a result of middle class people in the third world getting connected and assuming Western peoples were entirely depraved and without any moral value. As time has passed, they have gained a context for this and their anti-Western feelings are incomparably lower, despite all of the wars.

    • Troll: jacques sheeteThem Guys
  32. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:

    It kind of explains the current unhinged Russophobia and the promotion of everything destructive to Western Christian civilization.

    A couple of other sources related to this subject.
    Yale-educated historian William Walsh:
    Characters of the Inquisition
    Isabella of Spain

    And the works of Fr. Denis Fahey:

  33. What a fantastic post by Ron Unz. But with all due respect,much of what he has discovered would have been easily learned by following David Duke.
    To some of us this is old news.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  34. This is a truly remarkable article. Hopefully this leads to some much needed introspection, which would be in the interest of both Jews and Gentiles.

    This 2018 FED survey found that 41% of American adults can’t cover a $400 emergency expense.

    That number is actually a decrease from 50% in 2013.

    Yes, it does. I definitely think the misrule of our elites, both Jewish and Gentile, is certainly a factor. However, it seems like the quality of the citizenry has declined significantly (even after adjusting for demographic change). Modern-day Americans seem to have little desire to acquire knowledge, read, discuss issues, or study history. They’re frivolous people whose lives revolve around sports, celebrity gossip, tv, wild pleasure-seeking, and other forms of entertainment. They talk and think like children, which has all sorts of unfortunate consequences for them and their country. They are poor quality citizens.

    This isn’t anything new. Prosperous civilizations tend to decline with time, as comfortable living weakens their fortitude, debauches their mores, and undermines their once strong social bonds. The end result is a citizenry that’s physically&mentally fragile, ruinously hedonistic, and highly socially atomized.

    In its late stage, the citizenry of the Roman Empire had become totally distracted by chariot races and gladiator fights. Meanwhile, irresponsible leaders, some of whom were literally insane, misruled and looted the empire. Eventually, the hollowed out empire was destroyed by the Germanic barbarian hordes. This pattern has been repeated numerous times by many different civilizations.

    See the video below.

    Our elites can get away with so much because they rule over a population of gluttons, clowns, fools, and hedonists. Such a population can be easily distracted and, when needed, intimidated. Elites tend to behave much better when they have a sober-minded, responsible citizenry to keep them in line. Elites run wild when the population is too distracted, enfeebled, atomized, debauched, and ignorant to do anything.

    If Colonial-era America had been populated by the inhabitants of “Sodom and Gomorrah,” the British would’ve never left.

    “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.”

    “The first generation makes it, the second generation spends it, the third generation drinks it.”

    Today’s Anglo-Saxons are nothing like their ancestors.

    Around the late 70s and early 80s (when wages and productivity truly diverge), “Reagnomics” (tax cuts, deregulation, financialization, union breaking, offshoring, commoditization of labor) was implemented in the U.S. It was so successful for our oligarchs that other Anglo&Euro nations followed our example. Decades of these policies have enriched bankers and executives, while impoverishing workers.

    • Replies: @Ace
  35. “When a ruling elite has limited connection to the population it controls, benevolent behavior is far less likely to occur”

    I have no opinion on the thesis itself (although the way it’s phrased, it doesn’t sound convincing), but are you implying that Leon Trotsky (for example), coming form an assimilated novorussian peasant family, had more ‘limited connection’ to the population than Nicholas II, or, say, Pyotr Stolypin?

    And if you do believe that this ‘connection’ is a function of religion of one’s ancestors rather than one’s real life experiences, then perhaps you’d care to explain why?

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  36. geokat62 says:

    Wow, Ron Unz really busts it wide open with his latest American Pravda installment.

    While he shines a spotlight on many new revelations, I wanted to draw attention to the following two which relate to most of the exchanges I have with my interlocutors on this site.

    The first is directed at the PEAbrain and his peeps:

    Ignorance, indeed!

    The second is directed at The Maven. While he constantly stresses the importance of the threat of antisemitism, I normally respond that the opposite is the real threat. And this quote by Israel Shahak backs that up:

    • Replies: @iffen@iffen
  37. JessicaR says:

    What an interesting article! As a non-Jew, who did not have an education in Judaism, I have a slightly different take on Judaism than on Israel Shahak.

    1. In my judgment, Shahak failed to distinguish between rabbinical rulings and local folk traditions. In his book, he includes a reference to Jews spitting in front of Christian churches and cemeteries. While this did sometimes happen, Baruch Kimmerling claimed–in correspondence with me–that this practice was a folk tradition and not an official religious practice. In any community with millions of members, some people will do disgusting things. However, that does not mean that most of its members approve of–or even know about–these practices.

    On a human level, I can’t imagine too many mothers in any culture encouraging their children to spit. A big part of motherhood is discouraging children from doing disgusting things with their bodies. Why undermine all that hard work with church spitting?

    2. A useful perspective on the book is provided by a review by Baruch Kimmerling: This link provides a preview but gives enough to give the flavor of the review. Kimmerling’s basic claim is that Shahak exaggerates the degree of anti-Gentile animus in Judaism and that the dominant reaction is one of anxiety and fear, rather than hatred.

    3. Furthermore, according to Kimmerling, various “loopholes” existed within Judaism that allowed kind treatment of Gentiles. Usually, these loopholes were framed in terms of avoiding hurt feelings and endangering Jews, but in fact, these provisions gave Jews a wider leeway in befriending and helping Gentiles.

    4. Most Jewish doctors, even the Orthodox, would not adhere to provisions about discriminatory treatment of non-Jewish patients.

    5. I do not deny that the fanaticism Shahak describes does in fact exist. However, Judaism embraces many different interpretations, many of which are quite different than the ones he discusses in his book. Consider, for example, the Israeli group “Rabbis for Human Rights,” which adamantly opposes the views Shahak objects to. Many of these rabbis are Orthodox.

    6. I once worked as a long-term substitute at two schools run by Chabad Lubavitch. Everyone knew I wasn’t Jewish and I was well and fairly treated.

    7. One should always distinguish between a religious system and the people in it. While I do think ultraorthodoxy–but not modern orthodoxy–is a flawed religious system, many of the people in that system are quite decent individuals.

    8. I despise the way ultra-Orthodox Jewish females are treated.

    9. In spite of my disagreements with Shahak’s views on Judaism, I believe he was a great man who did heroic work to protect the human rights of Palestinians.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra@utu@Anonymous@Svigor
  38. If Jews apparently pray to Satan almost as readily as they pray to God, then it appears the Jew Testament has influenced Christians to imitate them, since Jesus is identified as Lucifer, if the Latin Vulgate translation of the Bible from which the word Lucifer originates, is correct.

    • Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, morning star/Lucifer, son of the dawn!”
    • Revelation 22:16: “I Jesus….Root and the Offspring of David…the bright and morning star/Lucifer.”

    That gives new meaning to the term “Star of David” and its hexagram symbol ✡.

    To be sure, Lucifer is Latin meaning “bearer of light,” to which Jesus identifies himself: “I am the light/Lucifer/Illuminati of the world.” (John 8:12)

    • Replies: @Joerg
  39. Jake says:

    Mother of God pray ofr Ron Unz. May all the Jews over the ages who converted to Christ, starting with St. Andrew, pray for Ron Unz.

    Jews who wish him dead by now surely are legion, and no morality stands in their way, nor does fear of any governmental authority.

    • Agree: utu
  40. Sean says:

    Israelis would seem to be very unJewish Jews. I am not sure how much their methods can be related to their religion or a small grouping with integral-nationalistic views like the Stern gang. The incipient military Zionism of Israel was fostered by Orde Wingate

    Wingate, who apparently set the tone on his first night operation with the SNS by murdering an Arab, was a cousin of T.E Lawrence, so his antipathy to Palestinians may have had a rather curious basis.

  41. ” For the last two thousand years, Jews have almost invariably existed as small, relatively weak minorities living in the lands of others, ”

    The last two thousand years began in CE 18.
    Twice thereafter Rome sent powerful armies to Palestine to fight the jews.
    After beating jews militarily the ideological destruction began: christianity.
    If Jezus ever existed or not, Roman citizen Paul created christianity, aimed at jews.
    How Paul became a Roman citizen I do not (yet) know, on the total population of the Roman empire of more than four million there were no more than a few hundred thousand Roman citizens.
    They had special rights, to be fed in Rome for free, and direct appeal to the emperor in case they were persecuted.
    Palestine was a Roman province, but Pontius Pilatus could not sentence Paul, on the contrary, he got an escort of 1300 soldiers on his way from Jerusalem to the coast where he took a ship that would bring him to Rome.
    If Paul was a secret agent of the emperor, w’ll never know, after going aboard the old sources do not mention Paul again.

    Then about judaism, when some correspondent told he about his book The Weight, I would not believe it.
    How many jews still think that only jews are humans, and that non jews are just animals disguised as humans, bcause it would not be proper for jews to be served by animals, I do not know.
    But when one googles ‘gentiles in halacha’ one finds an article by three rabbis confirming that judaic theology indeed only sees jews as humans.

    Then there is the rule and conscience question.
    Jew live good when they follow the Talmudic rules, there are two Talmuds, they’re not identical, one has, from memory 20.000 rules, the other 22.000, something like that.
    Rabbi Graetz, in his nine volume or so history of the jews of 1880 or so, states that conscience has no role in judaism.
    What he does not write is how dodging rules seems to be THE jewish sport.

    Houston Stewart Chamberlain, ‘Die Grundlagen des Neunzehnten Jahrhunderts’, 1898- 1907, München; many quotes from Graetz
    Lewis Mumford, ‘The city in history, Its origins, its transformations and its prospects’, London, 1991, 1961;the author is of the opinion that the jewish rules had two objects: separation from other peoples, and maximum population growth.
    Michael Grant, ‘The Jews in the Roman World’, 1973, New York; how jews were a considerable power in the Roman world
    Yigael Yadin, ‘Massada, Hero’s fortress and the zealots’ last stand’, London 1996; the enormous Roman effort to destroy the last jewish resistance
    Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, ‘Verschlusssache Jesus, Die Wahrheit über das frühe Christentum’, (The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception, 1991), 2005, Bergisch Gladbach; the theory about Paul being a secret agent of the emperor, but also a description of the scrolls. One of them of copper sheeting, describing all the places where the temple treasures had been hidden; Grant explains how the temple got rich, so I’m inclined to believe that the descriptions were real.
    Flavius Josephus, ‘Geschichte des Jüdischen Krieges’, Wiesbaden, 1978; descriptions of the Roman jewish wars, and the oldest suicide resistance.
    Since a long time try to remember what book mentions that jews were implicated in the murder of Ceasar, he was taking away their prerogatives.
    Michel Rostovtzeff, ‘Geschichte der Alten Welt, zweiter Band, Rom’, Bremen 1961 (The History of the Ancient World) explains what Ceasar did, tried to do, was to unify the Roman empire, anyone the same rights. It fits into this theory that Ceasar also wanted to abolish special rights for jews.

    • Replies: @anon@ploni almoni
  42. Jake says:
    @Mitchell Porter

    And here are the indispensable truths to carry forward:

    Jews as a group will remain the same until such time as converted completely, truly, to Christ.

    Because being anti-Christ is central to Jewish identity, and because only European peoples built a Christian civilization, Jewish culture will always be viciously anti-white Gentile, because Christ-hating Jews feel they are justified in Christ-hating if they can defeat, subdue, ruin the peoples of historic Christendom.

    Protestantism even under the ‘anti-Semite Luther’ is a series of heresies that requires Judaizing.

    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a thoroughly Judaizing heresy that formed the final, and most important (because theological and therefore both spiritual and moral) basis of WASP culture.

    The British Empire spread the fruits of WASP Judaizing across the globe. The Yank Empire has continued the spread, and entrenchment, of stridently pro-Jewish culture across the globe.

  43. Hans says:
    @Colin Wright

    Andrew Joyce has written a fine essay on the facts and fiction of the “pogroms” in Russia with the relevant citations from Klier. Highly recommended –

    • Replies: @Hans
  44. @Andrew Gilbert

    ” I recall from an undergraduate history course that Hitler revived the German economy through massive deficit spending, budgets predicated on the coming wartime plunder ”

    Mainly nonsense.
    Schacht primed indeed the German economy using Keynesian economics, but by creating special money just to be used by enterprises among themelves.
    Hjalmar Schacht, ´76 Jahre meines Lebens’, Bad Wörishofen, 1953
    Hitler never wanted war:
    A J P Taylor, ‘The Origins of the Second World War’, 1961, 1967, Londen
    Massive deficit spending: FDR.

    • Replies: @Anon
  45. @Mitchell Porter

    André Schwartz-Bart, ‘Le Dernier des Justes’, 1959, 1980 Paris
    Francine Kaufmann, ‘Pour Relire “Le Dernier des Justes”‘, 1987 Paris

    Francine Kaufmann is a very intelligent woman, so when I ordered her book I expected criticism on the mentioned novel.
    But is was the opposite, she defends the writer.
    Novels often better than any scientific book describe a historical situation, I think Le dernier des justes does.

  46. Excellent, informative article, this should be required reading for everyone on planet earth.

    I have delved into the Talmud and found it to be–without exception–the most racist, hate-filled and obscene document ever compiled. Based on those writings alone Jews should be classified as the most extremist hate group this world has ever seen.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  47. @JessicaR

    Ralph Giordano, ‘Israel um Himmels willen Israel’, 1993 Köln
    A book written by a German jew about his long visit to Israel.

  48. utu says:
  49. @Tyrion 2

    ” For example, the entire Torah is read out in services every year. ”

    The Torah cannot be read out, what is read out is one of many interpretations.
    Christine Kauffmann, and an atheistic colleage rabbi explain in lectures why, alas in French.
    The lectures are on internet.
    Very interesting

    • Replies: @Zeidner
  50. @JohnRedburn

    Jewry did anything possible to prevent the translation around 1870

  51. JackOH says:

    Ron, thanks for this very lively and provocative piece.

    I have pretty close to zero expertise in Judaism, but it’s pretty common Western knowledge that Christianity has been a turbulent religion, sometimes violent, sometimes passive, sometimes corrupt, and that history has been written about and opinions drawn from it. Seems to me no reason why Judaism ought to be exempt from reasonable public examination. (I’m a cradle Lutheran, lapsed for decades, and sort of describe myself as a “reviving Christian” these days. Non-dogmatic, non-observant type.)

    • Replies: @Svigor
  52. Hi Ron,

    What courage it took to be true to your principles. Thanks for the article. Just wanted to point out a possible typo, where you wrote Israeli Defense Minister, “Israel Sharon.” I believe it should be “Ariel Sharon.”


  53. @utu

    Hitler just wanted to recreate the Germany that existed before 1914
    S.Fischer-Fabian, ´Herrliche Zeiten, Die Deutschen und ihr Kaiserreich’, Wien 2006
    Herrliche Zeiten, a marvelous time, what it was in my opinion; Kaiserreich, empire,.
    Socially, democratically, scientific, technical, etc

    • Replies: @utu@Jake
  54. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:

    Fischer is another hyper-IQed guy who devoted decades of his life to reading and researching. He too came to the same conclusion as Unz regarding the evil of A.D. Judaism. Fischer near the end of his life became philosophical and then theological. He read Chesterton’s Outline of Sanity and books by Catholic theologians (not easy to come by in almost exclusively Lutheran Iceland).

    From a recent biography of Fischer:

    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @Jake
  55. Superb piece of work!

    No further comments necessary.

    • Replies: @Jared Eliot
  56. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:

    And Rod (((Rosenstein))) comes out with a federal indictment of some Russians for hacking a private e-mail account and spilling the beans on this spirit cooking.

  57. Tyrion 2 says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    It isn’t friendly. I don’t believe in it. But don’t Christians believe that only Christians go to heaven? While everyone else burns for eternity?

    I don’t get offended by such a belief because a) they’ve not made that decision b) it seems like a fairly logical corollary to their religious doctrine c) there’s a practical and historical context.

    • Replies: @Anonymous@vinteuil@Anon@Svigor
  58. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:

    Yeah, but strangely this pushes people in the opposite direction. You’d think after reading this you’d come away feeling that this stuff is demonic and has been shown to be so destructive and thus that which they despise most and work so strenuously against, namely Christianity, would be good. But most of the people detailing this stuff (e.g., Kevin MacDonald) are atheist.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  59. vinteuil says:

    If this article doesn’t kill, once and for all, and, along with it, ISteve, than nothing will.

    • Replies: @Hairway To Steven
  60. Ron is a gutsy guy. That said, there is a quite a bit of horseshit in all religion. An old Navy CPO told me that once and I have never forgotten it.


Komentari na prvi clanak! - #60-#120.....


  1. Frankie P says:
    @Colin Wright


    Please watch the following documentary on the role of Jews in the Bolshevik Revolution and the Communists of Russia. I recommend it because the man who made it relies almost totally on the writings of Jewish historians and Jews involved in the Revolution.

  2. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Come on. You haven’t read Dante’s Inferno or works by Doctors of the Church (esp., St. Teresa of Avila) regarding Christians in hell. But apart from that, hell is merely eternal privation or eternal separation from God or eternal solitary confinement. While Christians in theory have an easier means to be united with God they also have a higher bar because of that means. And Church leaders have an even higher bar given their status— special grace or extra grace (St. John Chrysostom, Doctor of the Church, wrote that “the road to hell is paved with the skulls of bishops”).

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  3. Being raised a Southern Baptist(Christian Zionist)it took the roll out of the internet and a desire to learn the REAL facts, along with a few years research to learn of the truths of which you speak. One web site which was instrumental in my awakening to the dangers of Talmudic Judaism was “Come and Hear”. It is a great source of information on this subject.

    Ron, your article was very enlightening and very in depth. If America does not expel the cancer of radical Zionism which has infected her, she will surly be finished.

  4. vinteuil says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Yeah, pretty much, but most Christian believers these days try to soften it a bit, insisting that “burning in hell” is just a metaphor for separation from God.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  5. utu says:
    @jilles dykstra

    You are a fool and Hitler was a fool. You are excused because no deeper understanding of reality (Liever Turks dan Paaps) is expected from a Dutch but Hitler being an Austrian Catholic is not excused.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  6. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Not exactly, though in some cases depending on the sect.

    As far as traditional Catholic and general standardish Protestant teaching is concerned:

    Relevant section (I apologize for length):

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  7. Old fogey says:

    You are a brave and courageous man, Mr. Unz. Bravo.

  8. Jake says:

    “Over the years prominent Israeli rabbis have sometimes publicly debated whether Jewish power has now become sufficiently great that all the Christian churches of Jerusalem, Bethleham, and other nearby areas can finally be destroyed, and the entire Holy Land completely cleansed of all traces of its Christian contamination. Some have taken this position, but most have urged prudence, arguing that Jews needed to gain some additional strength before they should take such a risky step. These days, many tens of millions of zealous Christians and especially Christian Zionists are enthusiastic advocates for Jews, Judaism, and Israel, and I strongly suspect that at least some of that enthusiasm is based upon ignorance.”

    Yes, but the fact remains that Judaizing heresy always produces pro-Jewish culture and politics, including culture and politics that intentionally promote Jews and Jewish notions as part of the culture war to destroy ‘other’ Christians.

    WASP culture is Exhibit A. And true-believing, including old time Puritan Judaizing theology believing, WASPs will back Israel even if Israel starts overrunning churches, turning them into synagogues or museums. The most obvious such people in America are the Pentecostal and, increasingly, Southern Baptist and other ‘fundamentalist’ Evangelicals, but all Mainline Protestant churches have their more country club version of the problem. George Will is an atheist version of the upper middle class Mainline Protestant form of WASP Judaizing.

    I have zero doubt that 100% Gentile blood devout Evangelicals I know very well and know like me would play Oliver Cromwell and murder me, if their Judaizing religious leaders were to be convinced by Rabbis that doing so would spread ‘Bible truth’. Their religion is the direct fruit of Anglo-Saxon Puritanism, and until they are fully converted from it, they will follow its directives.

    You cannot change that by changing church. It is religion that bubbles up from the cultural core. That’s the reason that English-speaking Catholicism is now as much a Judaizing mess in upper middle class form as is the Episcopal church.

    You assimilate to WASP culture: you assimilate to Judaizing.

    In a nutshell, that the reason that English replaced Yiddish as the international Jewish language. That is the reason that Jews from all the globe, speaking all languages, encourage the peoples of the world to become more Anglicized.

  9. Blood passover is a beautifully written work on Medieval Venetian history it’s densely footnoted and and should be considered a work of Scholarship. But the most ‘democratic’ state in the middle east broke the man and stopped the work’s publication. Dr. Toaff deserved an award for his meticulous work.

    The book gives a vivid potrait of jewish financial swindlers doing back then what they do now, control the banks and indulge in high level fraud.

  10. Tyrion 2 says: • Website

    I have read Dante’s Inferno and Limbo seems pretty decent. Nonetheless, that was merely Dante’s way of allowing the greats from classical times not to burn. Limbo was of course still in hell too.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  11. Hans says:

    I should have mentioned Goldwin Smith’s excellent essay, The Vexing Jewish Question –

    and Churchill’s Zionism vs. Bolshevism –

    and E. Michael Jones’ outstanding The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit –

  12. Jake says:
    @jilles dykstra

    No. Hitler’s vision was of Germans making serfs of Slavs. Hitler’s great hero was the queer Frederick the Great, who alternated between Enlightenment ideas that sound gooey and tender, on the one hand, and desire, on the other, to revive the most amorally brutal forms of pagan German warring as life itself.

    The Hitler problem is the Germanic problem, Continental form. WASP is the other form of the Germanic problem, each wing of which sees almost all other Europeans as inferior and fit to be ground into dust.

    Hitler and Judaizing archetypal WASP Oliver Cromwell are not opposites. They are the two sides of the one coin.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon@jilles dykstra
  13. Jake says:

    Not Vatican II Catholicism, which is at least half-Protestant: the most stupidly liberal Mainline type of Protestantism.

  14. mcohen says:
    @academic gossip

    Of course he did not.the truth does not matter on the edge of uranus,just the lube.

    • Replies: @annamaria@Art
  15. anon[622] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    “Rome sent powerful armies.” Yeah, self-important since 66 AD. The six legions sent by Nero against Jews are precisely equal to the six legions he sent against Parthians – this was all Rome could muster in Middle East. The difference is that, of course, Parthians defeated Rome.

  16. Anonymous[184] • Disclaimer says:

    That Chief of Rome would be Elio Toaff (1951–2002), and not Israel Zolli (1940–1943), who converted to Catholicism.

  17. Unz’s chain of masterpieces remains unbroken!

    I strongly suspect that all of it is based upon ignorance.

    So basically what we’re dealing with here is a kind of 3000 year-old Scientology.

    They’ll probably believe it; they’ll just scratch their heads wondering how we were too stupid to see it going on all around us.

  18. Seraphim says:

    Before Hugh of Lincoln (1255) was William of Norwich (1144).
    The Italian boy was Simone of Trento (known as Simonino di Trento), whose case was addressed by Ron commenting the ‘scandal’ provoked by the book of Prof. Ariel Toaff “Pasque di sangue” (Blood Passover). Simonino was beatified and his cult was extremely popular in Trento until 1965 when the Catholic hierarchy ‘desanctified’ him and forbade the public cult.
    The ‘Syrian’ was Father Thomas, a French citizen originally from Sardinia, and the superior of a Franciscan convent at Damascus who disappeared along with his servant in 1840. The “Damascus Affair” brought the massive intervention of European, British and American Jews in defense of the culprits. “For the first time in American Jewish life, Jews… organized themselves politically to help Diaspora Jewry in distress.”
    “For the Jews, the Damascus affair launched modern Jewish politics on an international scale, and for American Jews it represented their first effort at creating a distinctive political agenda. Just as the United States had used this affair to proclaim its presence on the global scale, so too did American Jews, in their newspapers and at mass meetings, announce to their coreligionists in France and England that they too ought to be thought of players in global Jewish diplomacy.”
    In the same year (1840) we have also the “Rhodes blood libel” resulting in the same intervention from Europe. Salomon Mayer von Rothschild from Austria, Sir Moses Montefiore from England and Adolphe Cremieux from France (the founder of the Alliance Israelite Universelle) took the lead in fighting the ‘blood libel’

    • Replies: @Anon@ivan
  19. Rich says:

    Well, the great Mr Unz, champion of free speech, has taken a giant step here. We’ll begin to hear stories about him now, he’ll be attacked personally in the mainstream media and attempts will be made to destroy this site, and to remove his presence in the public arena, or to defame him. None of his opponents will argue against him on facts, they will attack him personally, calling him names. which I guess is a kind of holdout from the days when people thought cursing someone actually worked. Let’s all hope Mr Unz survives these coming attacks, and the cause of free speech grows strong again.

    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
  20. iffen says:

    While he shines a spotlight

    My eyes! My eyes!

  21. iffen says:

    quote by Israel Shahak backs that up:

    OMG, You found a Jew who said, “Blah, Blah, Blah.”

    • Replies: @Anon
  22. Mr. Anon says:
    @Colin Wright

    I think it was David Horowitz (the ex-communist turned Republican, not the consumer advocate) who said about Christians (I paraphrase): I don’t care if they think I’m going to Hell, as long as they don’t try to send me there. A very reasonable point of view, I think.

  23. Mr. Anon says:
    @Mitchell Porter

    Of course, the same could be said of the Christians of that era too.

  24. Anonymous[423] • Disclaimer says:

    Here’s one of the Jewish “protesters” at the 2018 Academics’ Ball in Vienna:

  25. Mr. Anon says:
    @Andrew Gilbert

    And it is afterall well-known that conquerors routinely show their disdain for those whom they conquer by avoiding any relations with their women.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  26. Mr. Anon says:

    Perhaps pre-dating that was this:

    The Portage to San Cristobal of A.H.

    which caused a minor stir when it was published and adapted for the stage. I remember reading a review of the play in Newsweek, in which some of the dialogue was quoted and it expressed a similar idea. It was however, just a work of fiction.

  27. Mr. Anon says:

    DDOS attack in 3…..2…..1…..

  28. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @academic gossip

    A cursory search reveals this: ; I don’t know if that’s the article of Ms.(?) Baytch’s to which you refer.

    Could you link to the study you’re talking about, or some discussion or summary of it? What with you not being familiar with Mr. Unz’s articles and his possibly not being familiar with yours it seems there is a good deal of talking-past going on here. Here are some search results: ; here are some more ;; and finally here are some more:

    I haven’t gone through them all but these seem like relevant search terms.
    By the way, Mr. Unz or anyone else, what’s the mysterious “postid” in the search url? The searches seem to work fine without it.

  29. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:

    To be exactly precise, he found an iffen who said, “Blah, Blah, Blah.”

    (He who lives by the quip…)

  30. Mr. Anon says:

    I think you’re on to something there.

    I’ve often thought that there is a fatal flaw in the anglo-saxon race: the conceit of extreme individualism – I’ll look out for me and mine, and y’all can go to Hell. It explains a lot about America.

    • Replies: @chris
  31. macilrae says:

    Sir Richard Burton, the famed explorer and great ethnologist of the nineteenth century, reached many similar conclusions during his inquiries into Judaism. While he was British consul in Damascus he attempted to curtail the activities of the Jewish merchants – who had committed abuses against the local population. Appealing to their coreligionists in powerful positions in England, they succeeded in helping to get Burton removed from his post.

    After his death a jumble of Burton’s writings on the subject was published under the title “The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam” ( Originally, the manuscript had included an appendix headed “Human Sacrifice Among the Sephardine [sic] or Eastern Jews” on documented cases of ritual murder but this was suppressed and has remained inaccessible. In recent years, however, the forbidden manuscript has briefly surfaced; being offered for sale at Christies but seemingly not reaching the reserve price of 210,000 pounds. There was huge controversy over the appropriateness of this offering so the actual fate of the work is unknown.

    • Replies: @Rob McX
  32. Tyrion 2 says: • Website
    @Mr. Anon

    You think you have been conquered by Jews?

    • Replies: @Wally@Mr. Anon
  33. Fascinating article. Bravo, Mr. Unz! I’m as goyisch as they come, and I’ve always had a grudging respect for the Jews as survivors and capitalists while realizing that much of what Organized Jewry does is completely unethical. Seems they’re much more of a warrior people than we’ve suspected — like the Vikings or the Lakota or the Japanese, only secretly so. Indeed, seeing how the previous three groups are now emasculated shadows of their former selves, the Jewish approach has been the most successful. I must read Shahak’s book!

    • Replies: @Wally
  34. @Seamus Padraig

    3000-year old Scientology! Love the metaphor!

  35. If reincarnation exists, our Ron Unz has been in former life James Joyce or Dorothy Richardson. Karmic tendencies of stream-of-consciousness style of writing are so strong that he begins with Talmud & Kabbalah, then goes on to expulsions of Jews, usury, medical profession among Jews, Rabbinical nutjobs ..and then to Communists, Nazis, US Jewish ethno-nationalists, Kevin MacDonald, Solzhenitsyn & the rest. It is simply impossible to comment on all, or most of these topics.

    Generally, the author has correctly described, in Jungian terms, Jewish “shadow” or inner devil, i.e. sum of destructive & negative tendencies of this entity (we can perceive any collective as an entity, a sort of super-personality as depicted, with different aims, in Hobbes’ “Leviathan”).

    Where Unz is not fair, it is his reductionist view. He equates Jews with their (stereo)typical vices, which is the same mistake we make when we reduce a whole person to his loathsome traits, while ignoring laudable ones.

    I’ll mostly c/p something I wrote before, with just a few extra points:

    1. except (perhaps ?) some fringe sects, Talmudic Judaism does not worship Satan. The claim is simply a monumental nonsense. It is a misunderstanding that is frequently attached to another Middle Eastern sect, Yazidis, and in their case it is also a sort of spiritual calumny & gross disinformation (in our Western world, Cathars had been accused of the same perversion). Esoteric meaning of the role of Satan is just disfigured by orthodox religious literalists.

    2. blood libel? Not convincing. As I’ve said before, it is true that human sacrifice had existed in virtually all archaic societies; it is also true that occult traditions frequently consider human blood as the most potent intensifier in acquisition of occult powers. Just, Judaism has gotten rid of human sacrifice long ago & there is no evidence that Jews (or Jewish occultists) had been practicing blood “potentiation” either in the first Christian millennium, or in Zoroastrian, Greek-Roman, Mesopotamian polytheistic & Islamic societies. Significantly enough, accusations of “blood libel” chronologically coincided with the rise of anti-Judaism in Western Europe & intensity of religious fervor we associate with Crusades. More, the claim that these rituals were, supposedly, uniform has not been corroborated. Even perfectly quotidian & normal Jewish religious practices significantly vary across time & place (Sephardim, Mizrahim, Ashkenazim,..).

    As far as Jewish ethnocentrism goes- it’s the cornerstone of their religion & identity (which has been formed from, roughly, 700 BC to 100 AD). It is not a reaction, but the very essence of self- definition of that ethno-religious group & culture. Judaism is an imaginative refurbishing of other Near Eastern religions; it does not possess its own mythology. Normative Judaism- unlike Kabbalah- is a Platonized religion in many respects similar to early Confucianism: life’s fulfillment is achieved through learning, study & mostly mental work- and not piety, nor supernatural yearnings. Early Judaism, as recorded in the Pentateuch, had not possessed that idea. Somewhere around 100-300 A.D. Jews adopted Plato’s ethic of self-cultivation through intellectual work & produced a vast literature- from contemporary perspective- of, generally, dated & sterile Behemoth nitpicking trivialities (Talmud, Responsa, ..). There are some problematic passages in the Talmud with regard to Gentiles & Christians. Babylonian Talmud was composed from ca. 200-600 AD; it has 6,500 big folio pages & its English translation runs over 15,000 pages. So- why not openly say there are a few insulting passages that reflect early medieval spirit of times? Talmud is a mixture of wisdom literature (similar to Confucian “Analects”), various superstitions on magic & astrology, exegeses on murky passages of Hebrew Bible (frequently fantastic & hilarious), and mostly a codification of Jewish law, similar to Islamic shariah (agriculture, marriage, various taboos & ceremonies, crimes & misdemeanors, food etc.)

    Christianity was mentioned only a few times in this library of books, almost always in negative light. Why not publicly say it’s obsolete in some areas? And that such fellows are, basically, freaks:

    With regard to Judaism’s “ideological” spiritual arrogance, Shahak (and others) are right: their religious culture is essentially supremacist & there is no other spiritual tradition I know of that denies other people basically the same anthropological status in religious sense. In Kabbalah, which is esoteric extension of normative Judaism, only Jews possess divine portion of “soul”. Others do not.

    We know from different Gnostic religious traditions that they all aver there is split between empirical human psyche & essential, divine Self (Buddhata/Buddha Nature in Mahayana Buddhism, Atman in Vedanta Hinduism, Daimon or Nous in Greek religion, Inner Man and Christ Logos in (Neoplatonic) Christianity, Angel Christ in Christian Gnosticism, ruh/spirit and Perfect Nature in Hermetic variants of Islamic Sufism etc.). Only in Kabbalah & other variants of Judaism they deny that other humans are, basically, the same as they are. According to them, only Jews possess Neshamah (which is divine), or “upper layers” of Neshamah, like Chaya and Yechidah. Such religious arrogance & spiritual autism do not exist, as far as I know, anywhere else.

    For those interested in Jewish controversial topics, I would recommend Shahak’s books (as a beginning), then Lindemann & Walter Laqueur:

    For a brief history & practice, Raynor & Goldberg (although they treat Pentateuch & Moses story as a proto-historical narrative):

    Much more comprehensive history is classic Simon Dubnov’s monumental masterpiece.

    If you are interested in Kabbalah, then crucial works by Gerschom Scholem & Moshe Idel, for instance:

    For comparativist history of ideas, no one is better than Mircea Eliade:

    Other topics (Nazism, Solzhenitsyn, Jewish role in Bolshevism & Hollywood,..) had been addressed elsewhere, and this post is already way too long ….

  36. @vinteuil

    My thoughts exactly. This article may end up finally killing — it will now be (properly) understood to be a hate site by the vast majority of people made aware of it. Ron Unz must have, at some level, understood this when he was preparing the piece for publication. Which means that his article is an act of self-destruction.

    If goes, so will iSteve. That’s the real tragedy.

    • Replies: @Wally
  37. @Tyrion 2

    That seems yet another good example of projection. Your plainly canned commentary is clearly contrived, but you do get high points for consistency.

    Your comments rarely fail to amuse, but do you really think you’re accomplishing anything of value by making them? In case you’re wondering, they substantiate much of the author’s case against the arrogant fanatics.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  38. Pat Casey says:
    @Tyrion 2

    The Torah is only the first five books of the Old Testament. Ron said:

    Emphasis added.

    You are wrong.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  39. @Seamus Padraig

    True and they keep getting better.

    I strongly suspect the same.

    True without a shred of doubt.

  40. rjl says:

    Also, maybe “…charms, portions, spells, incantations…” should read “…charms, potions, spells, incantations…” 

    Excellent article.

  41. ANDYHANDY says:


    • Replies: @anon
  42. AaronB says:

    Lol, a short while ago I would have agreed with this article.

    But the truth is simply that the whole world is always at war, all groups constantly war against each other.

    The fact that Jews were kicked out of every country is trotted out as some highly significant fact pointing to the uniquely anti social character of Jewish culture, and I myself viewed it this way not too long ago – but every European country has been at constant and unceasing war for all of its history, and Asian victims of European aggression have found something uniquely anti social in European culture.

    England, France, Italy, Spain, Germany – constant war. This is no different than Jews being constantly at war with every society among which they settle.

    It seems to be the law of this world that every group with a distinct identity wages war against every other group to the extent of its power and ability.

    Jews use cunning and deceit and money to wage war – Europeans tend to find this uniquely abhorrent, much preferring their own method of war which is physical strength and brutality, but I can find no reason why a physically stronger person has more of a “right” to impose his will on others than the cunning person.

    Jews are remarkably clear headed about this – I have had Jews tell me that Jews cheat, but gentiles murder, and this is what one should watch out for in dealing with the two groups. History bears this out – but in truth, the roles could beeasily reversed under the right circumstances, as a weapon is dictated by the situation.

    Each group uses its own distinct weapons, and views the weapons of other groups as uniquely “dishonorable”. But this is a part of the human comedy.

    Jewish contempt and animosity for non Jews is very real and one can find any number of quotes in Jewish sacred scriptures which bear this out – but Jewish universalism and even respect and appreciation for goyim (!) is equally real and an important strain in Jewish culture, eschatology, and theory of this world and the end of days.

    Like any pre modern culture, Jewish culture is complex, multi-faceted, and contradictory – a rigid, simplistic mentality of the kind produced by the excessive study of mathematics, science, or computer science is ill equipped to make heads or tails of a way of thought that is fundamentally richer and more complex and equivocal than the rigid simplicities of modernity, with its anxiety-based yearning for simple facts to anchor itself onto in a shifting quicksand world.

    It would be interesting to contrast the anti social passages of Judaism with those of Christianity or other groups – for Christians, all others suffer eternal torments for not believing what they believe. Even Jews agree that righteous gentiles go to heaven.

    It is all part of the human comedy – minds that are able to gain the larger perspective and soar high above the petty entanglements of group identity and self interest can look down on these skirmishes, engagements, and battles with each group vying for position, trying to paint its rival as uniquely capable of acts it itself commits daily, can look down on these things from the perspective of eternity and smile a bit.

    But there are few such minds – and nothing is more exciting to most people than to do spend their lives in jockeying for some minor advantage over some rival group.

    The one good point about this article is that Jews are indeed the enemy of every group they settle among, at least potentially, just as the English nation spent its history as a nation (now ending) in endless warfare against enemies near and far, against close neighbors and distant Asiatic kingdoms, according to the ancient law of group against group, individual against individual.

    The correct way to view the attempt to find Jewish culture uniquely anti social by Europeans is as merely another skirmish in the war of groups, and as an attempt by Europeans to gain advantage over their rivals.

    Of course, there is a way to escape this war of all against all, but in each generation only few succeed in doing so – ultimately, I hope, everyone will, as the cycle of reincarnation continues, and each individual advances up the rungs.

    • Replies: @Anonymous@annamaria@Sam J.@Rich@Anon@RW
  43. Tyrion 2 says: • Website

    Don’t be silly. The Talmud is a vast collection of purposefully contradictory attempts to explain the written Torah. This makes the Torah, and the rest of the Old Testament, far more central to Judaism than the Talmud. Your weaselly attempt to avoid admitting this by focussing on his use of the word “most” is utterly irrelevant, especially given the relative inportant of the five books if the Torah versus the rest of the Old Testament.

    Not that the Talmud can be described as one work anymore than Wikipedia, including its endless edits pages, could.

  44. TheOldOne says:

    Ok, here goes:

    I believe that Judaism controls the US, the EU, etc. The thing I just CANNOT understand is WHY!

    Yes, Jews are intelligent, but they aren’t THAT intelligent; Jews are VERY ethnocentric, but that doesn’t explain it either.

    The fact is that they make up only 1% or so of the worlds population; I’ve always thought that the bottom line is that force rules, but that doesn’t seem to apply in this case.

    Why don’t gentiles and Asians simply take back what the Jews have stolen FROM THEM; how could they stop us? We outnumber them several times over, and have far more military power. I just don’t get it!

  45. Tyrion 2 says: • Website
    @jacques sheete

    What do you think I am fanatical about?

  46. Wally says:

    Ask them what a ‘Nazi’ is.
    Of course their answer will be ‘holocaust’ something,
    Then ask them for actual proof.

    Game, set, match.

  47. Linh Dinh says: • Website

    Joe Sobran’s 1995 article “The Jewish Establishment” begins:

    But then Sobran says (bold is mine):

    Bravo to Ron Unz, then, for pointing out that the anti-Christian and anti-goy strains in Jewish thinking are foundational:

    • Replies: @Heros
  48. Anon[378] • Disclaimer says:
    @DB Cooper

    That sounds pretty silly. There are a number of different crosses but overwhelmingly the Christian cross is depicted as having a shaft under the horizontal cross piece a good deal longer than the part above. The Red Cross is about the only reminder I can think of what is sometimes depicted on the shield or armour of a Medieval knight. Can anyone substantiate this tale?

    • Replies: @Anon@anon
  49. Anonymous[423] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    If someone’s “loathsome traits” are leading him to try to kill me and my family I’ll end him on the spot. All the (fake) stories about his beautiful singing voice and his shiny jew-fro won’t matter, believe it or not.

    Not to mention that this particular “person” tried it over and over again for two millennia and only grew more insidious after every non-lethal slap-down.

    N e v e r a g a i n.

  50. ” … Two Hundred Years Together, and although that work soon appeared in Russian, French, and German, nearly two decades later, no English translation has ever been authorized.”

    There are a number of volunteers that have translated “Two Hundred Years.” This does not negate the statement regarding, “authorized.” Further research may help verify following translation sources:

    A web search will yield partial and occasionally complete translation in numerous PDFs.

    Interesting interview with Solzhenitsyn regarding this last of his works:

  51. Anonymous[680] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dan Hayes

    Ron Unz’s balls are so big they have their own gravitational field.

    But he is technically Jewish, so he can only be labeled as a ‘self hating Jew’ and pitied accordingly, which is many times less trouble than being labeled an anti semite. For my money, I don’t think we’re going to see a particularly strong reaction. It’ll be easier for them to ignore it.

  52. Wally says:
    @Andrew Gilbert

    ““seething hatred” for Christians doesn’t jibe particularly well with the Jewish intermarriage rate, an actual verifiable statistic that’s conspicuous in its absence.”

    That’s actually a survival strategy in an attempt to cleanup the diseased Jew gene pool.

    The wife usually ‘converts’, and the children are usually raised as ‘Jews’.

    And of course, very few Jew women look like ‘Wonderwoman’s’, Gal Godot.

    There you go.

  53. Anon[378] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    You really are getting sillier every day. Hitler didn’t want war indeed. He wanted what he wanted without having to fight. Gee whiz!

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  54. Wally says:

    Black researcher, Dr. Tony Martin, let’s us know who the prime sellers & owners of slaves really were, Jews.
    Dr. Tony Martin – The Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade

    Jew slave ship owners

    JEWS AND THE SLAVE TRADE–the-slave-trade.html

    • Replies: @Anon
  55. The more I learn, the more I am saddened by how little I know. This is a veritable magnum opus by Ron Unz. It is such a tragedy that this masterpiece of journalism will never catch the eyes of the majority of Americans while it still remains possible to save our souls. I am amazed by how many disparate and yet interconnected facts Ron has been able to weave into this short article. It is a testimony to the man’s brilliance and genius.

    May angels protect him from the barrage of attacks that will haunt the remainder of his life.

  56. densa says:


  57. @bossel

    Link please. I went for BloggingHeads and it wasn’t there.

    • Replies: @res
  58. iffen says:

    who was Ron Unz and about his Weltanschauung evolution.

    Why the fifty cent motivation when a nickel will do the job?

    He’s just as likely to be doing this out of spite towards the Jews that drove him from and denied him any success in the MSM business. What’s the analogy for a Jew with money that loves to fondle and count words rejected by the media business. A 7 foot tall black American that can’t dribble?

    • Replies: @annamaria@AaronB
  59. 36 ulster says:
    @mark green

    Chicago’s legendary journalist Mike Royko had it right when he dubbed Mario Savio’s antics at Berkeley as the Foul Speech Movement. It continues long after his passing. I have to admit that I’m still digesting this rather long article, but I’m impressed at the dispassionate tone of it. And at the similar tone of the link to Kevin MacDonald’s essay. Usually, such articles are so phlegm-flecked that I have to look askance at them. MacDonald’s essay seems to provide a rationale for the seemingly irrational fear of Christian America–a very tolerant bunch–by most of the Jewish commentariat. To the point that they eagerly endorse mass immigration by overtly anti-Semitic Middle Ostogoths and probably anti-Semitic peasants from Los Culitos del Sur.

  60. Ragno says:

    Besides reiterating that we are all, gratefully, in Ron Unz’s debt, I’d just like to add – perhaps cynically – that I sure am glad I finished downloading Ron’s priceless collection of science-fiction and adventure pulps from the Internet Archive well before this essay’s appearance!

    I’d also made copies of many, though certainly not all, of the samizdat texts storehoused there. (And you had best believe I will be downloading whichever titles I’d missed the first time just as soon as I finish typing this comment.)

    Ron, a lot of people are going to tell you this took balls to write and post. And indisputably this is true. But what it really exhibits for all the world to see is intellectual integrity to match that courage. Unfortunately we live in an age when the highest order of both courage and integrity are found in the little boy who, seeing a naked emperor, describes reality as it is – not what an august company of VIPs would like it to be, let alone loudly insist that you’re actually seeing, except that you’re lying or crazy.

    So, while you’re still here, and the angry/shrill/bloodthirsty tweets of the Good and Great have yet to fill the air like virtual confetti….thank you for this. You won’t be the first honest man they Bataan-march into the hinterlands of UnPersonhood – like poor Prof. Ross! – but, by God, maybe you can be the last.


Komentari na prvi clanak! - #120- #180....



  1. J says:

    Ron Unz was born a Jew and brought up as a Jew, so he must have had personal experience with the Judaism and with real living Jews. Apparently he had never heard or witnessed any of the fantastic rituals he describes and apparently believes to be true, and no one told ever him that he must hate Christians. To whom should he believe, to his own eyes and ears, or the bobbe-maises (crazy stories) of self-hating Jew Shahak? Unz seems to have lost touch with his own self and with palpable reality.

    • Replies: @annamaria@mcohen@bjondo
  2. ” … religious Jews apparently pray to Satan almost as readily as they pray to God …”

    A text within the Kabbalah known as Zohar instructs Jews to make sacrifices to Satan so that he’ll focus on the goyim and leave Israel alone, or something like that. The Gnostics believe that the Old Testament Yahweh is the demiurge, a satanic god (not the transcendent God) that traps and tortures human souls on Earth.

    “Even as late as the 1930s and afterward, international Zionist groups closely cooperated with the Third Reich on international economic projects … actually offered a military alliance to the Axis Powers …”

    There exists a conspiracy theory that the theosophy-inspired occult groups active in Austria and Germany in the 1910s and 1920s which gave rise to the Nazi cult and its Hitler-god were infiltrated by Zionist Kabbalists for the purpose of creating something like Nazism, a religious-political system that would be turned on European Jewry, thus creating a burnt offering to Yahweh; a sacrifice to enable the creation of Israel.

    ” … the detailed descriptions of the Jewish ritualistic murder practices are very similarly described in locations widely separated by geography, language, culture, and time period … ”

    And it is possible that these rituals share a common root: a supremacist death cult originating in ancient Babylon among the exile Jewish population from Judah.

    ” … the world is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine … ”

    Indeed it is. Reality as presented by materialists negates the soul, and diminishes both beauty and darkness. Imagination is the divine spark given to us by the transcendent God. The above article is a high point in the American Pravda series.

  3. @Grahamsno(G64)

    In fairness …. that link shows what liberalism in the classic sense flourishes in Israel even if it is nowhere near a majority emotion.

  4. Heros says:

    First of all, I tip my hat to Ron Unz. He is looking satan straight in the eye and may god protect him.

    However, once again I find reading this article to be frustrating because of all the milquetoast language used to try to keep an article that must be offensive to lying Jews from being offensive to lying Jews. Example:

    So after centuries of lies about their murder of Christian children when finally the proof hits Ron right between the eyes, he squirms around and wiggles out of clearly stating the depth of the depravity and damage that Jews have done to Christians for centuries. But even worse, Christians have been persecuted, ruined, tortured, and murdered for even implying that these massive jewish crimes are true. Jew crimes were simply projected back on the goyim, the goyim were punished and the jews got away. When has that ever happened before?

    ADL, SPLC, and all the other jewish hate organizations are nothing more that murderous cover up fronts for these crimes against humans with souls by jews, who clearly show by this practice that they are not of the same species as their victims. These goyim gaslighting organizations have been around for centuries twisting justice the same way jews twisted the dagger for years after stabbing Germany in the back in 1917.

    It is important to note, that just as jews call goyim anti-semite and ruin their lives or murder them for mentioning this jewish genetic lust for the ritual extraction of the blood of goyim infants, so exactly do they call goyim anti-semitic and ruin their lives or murder them for asking jews to provide evidence for 6 million dead Christian haters in the holohoax.

    Questions about the depth, depravity and history of jewish hate for goyim are one of the things that gods chosen people simply will not allow stupid goyim humans to ask. Its part of the Noahide laws that goyim across the west are forced to live under.

    • Troll: utu
  5. anon[298] • Disclaimer says:

    I very seldom call other posters trolls, but this, sir, is a troll post.

    • Replies: @ANDYHANDY
  6. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    Thanks very much for the information. I did spend a few minutes on the internet looking for dates and names.

    All I found of course was the evil blood libel and endless persecution of Jews by Christians and Popes. So I just posted what I remembered.

  7. Anonymous[423] • Disclaimer says:

    That’s hardly clear headed. It basically means that the Gentiles should be fought only when then start a war against you while the Tribe is “cheating” and scheming goyim demise 24/7/365.

    How’s that Jewish IQ number progressing anyway? 95 sound wildly optimistic at this point.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  8. AnonFromTN says:

    With all due respect, I can but disagree on several points.

    First, the author may be right about Jewish religion (I know next to nothing about it), but many secular Jews who break religious rules daily, support Israel and do their best to make its crimes look innocent. Many Jews and Gentiles, both religious and secular, present these crimes as non-crimes, simply because they are perpetrated against Palestinians.

    Second, Russia in the 1990s. Yes, it was a catastrophe, wholesale looting of the country by the few who had no ethical scruples. Most oligarchs were not just thieves, but murderers as well, although, just like mafia bosses, they did not do murders personally, always delegating dirty work to henchmen. A typical example is Khodorkovsky, promoted by the Western media: it is almost certain that he ordered his head of security, Alexei Pichugin, to arrange the 1998 murder of Vladimir Petukhov, mayor of Nefteyugansk, which was done on Khodorkovsky’s birthday. Pichugin was sentenced in Russia to life in prison for ordering three murders, including Petukhov’s. While Khodorkovsky is Jewish (secular, as far as we can tell), Pichugin is not. What’s more, Gorbachev and Yeltsin, who brought Russia almost to ruin, aren’t Jewish, either. Both of them are rightly perceived by the majority of Russian population as traitors, which they are.

    Third, Solzhenitsyn. In the context of Russian literature, he is third-rate at best. His literary talent is nowhere near that of the towering figures like Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, Gogol, or Pushkin. If we stick solely to the twentieth century and even exclude Tolstoy, Solzhenitsyn is nowhere near Bulgakov, Blok, and many others. The most adequate prescient description of him one can find in Dostoevsky’s Demons: it is hard to be a middling talent in Russian literature. Politically, he is also a very shady character. He claimed to have wanted to go to the front, which was the easiest thing to achieve in the USSR between 1941 and 1945, yet he always moved farther and farther away from the places where bullets and shells actually flied. He was imprisoned, but spent his time in VIP camps, not where rank-and-file GULAG prisoners were. If one wants to read a true account of GULAG, I can recommend Shalamov (who, BTW, always despised Solzhenitsyn as a liar and a fraud).

    Finally, the crazy world we know today was shaped by a lot of scoundrels, some Jewish, some not. Just recent examples: Clintons (both of them) and Bushes (all of them) weren’t Jewish, but they have a lot of innocent blood on their hands. Same goes for Blair, Cheney, and many others. I believe that the criminals should be identified and ultimately punished, or at least condemned. I also believe pointing the finger at particular groups, religious or national, is no more than a red herring. Frankly, I am surprised and disappointed that Ron Unz, who runs a remarkably truthful site with real freedom of speech and true difference of opinion, is contributing to that deception.

    • Replies: @Wally@utu@ploni almoni@bjondo
  9. D. K. says:
    @academic gossip

    Ms. Baytch took it upon herself to correct me, inter alia, at the very beginning of the comment thread to one of Mr. Unz’ many other postings here having to do with his meritocracy research:

    As pointed out by me to Ms. Baytch, in our extensive replies to one another in that particular comment thread, the “Harvard Crimson” survey findings that she cites are (along with their being social-scientifically dubious per se) about incoming freshmen’s religious affiliations, not their ethnic descent or identity. My Jewish brother-in-law, who was an Harvard undergraduate at the same time as Mr. Unz, is deeply into his Jewish identity; but, he also is an avowed atheist, despite his being formally bar mitzvahed as an adolescent, and he never would have claimed to be “Jewish” in the actual sense that that survey was asking of its respondents. I strongly suspect that a majority of the freshman at Harvard who identify as being Jewish, ethnically and socioculturally, would not claim that Judaism was their personal religious faith, whether they were being asked the question by their student newspaper or by the United States Bureau of the Census.

    • Replies: @mark green
  10. @Bardon Kaldian

    In the 21st century world of internet discourse one thing I’ve internalized is the “crazy bomb”. There are some subjects, so fraught, that everyone is “triggered”.

    I think that’s a big problem. To be triggered should be: to be disqualified from discourse of any consequence. I sincerely believe that. If I could put one limit on democracy, that would be my limit: does anything trigger you? … ok, then kindly go outside while the adults discuss serious matters, matters of consequence.

    So what do we do when there are subjects that trigger: everyone? 90%, suffices, for “everyone”.

    I’ve spent much of the last 18 hours wondering if I can ever post a comment on Unz again – not because of the substance of what Mr. Unz wrote – though there’s much to doubt and disagree with and I think that a charitable interpretation is that, that’s his point: to un-trigger us by forcing the triggering discussion.

    But the reason I’ve wondered is: crazy bomb. Mr. Unz just dropped the most high-power crazy bomb I’ve seen maybe in my lifetime’s memory. Everyone will be triggered. Anti-Semites, “allergic” gentiles, and certainly Jews. Everyone.

    Is discussion possible?

    There is the story of the boy and the dinosaur – who found a dinosaur in his bedroom and his parents refused to discuss it because: dinosaurs don’t exist – and they remained steadfast in their refusal until the dinosaur’s limbs grew out the windows and legs through the floors and he walked off with the house.
    Charitable interpretation: Unz is trying to get us to discuss the dinosaur

    There is Howard W. Campbell Jr. A possibility that should terrify the bonafide anti-Semites who find a commenting home here. Another charitable interpretation.

    And after we clear the crazy bomb and charitable interpretations, there’s finally your point. I’d like a word about that, and I worry it’s a word spoken in the dust cloud on the bottom floor of a building a quarter second after a bomb detonated in the basement and the upper floors are about to collapse on us.

    But here’s the word.

    It is said that the first crime is that one must not “name the Jew”. You are supposed to figure this out. Everyone is supposed to figure this out. It is a symptom of autism that one does not figure this out.

    Because we will not discuss this many who do figure it out derive different conclusions about why this is a rule.

    I would like to suggest to your point, and to Mr. Unz, that the most charitable reason for this rule is the true reason, and more importantly : it is a universal reason.

    One must not “name the Jew” for the same reason one must not name : anyone – collectively.

    That reason is: we are human, or cartoons. All acts of collective naming – reduce us from humans, to cartoons.

    This is why I have argued consistently , on these comments, that people must stop adopting the term “white”. To adopt and accept this term, is to agree to be named, and to be named by people who know exactly what they are doing when they name you. They dehumanize you. They make it possible to collectively judge you and condemn you. By accepting the name, you hasten the advance of their heinous agenda.

    And “they”, don’t need to be anybody at all. No Protocols are required, just Hobbes and Game Theory. It’s a war of man against man.

    Unz is unfair here – dangerously so – but if this was intended as a light to lead us out of the darkness then it starts with this rule: let us stop naming … anyone. Collective judgment will be all of our collective doom.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian@utu
  11. @Hairway To Steven

    What a well reasoned and well sourced response.

  12. @Anon

    Nevertheless, the cardinal Lorenzo Ganganelli, later Pope Clement XIV, in his famous report of 19 January 1760, presented to the Congregation of the Holy Office, with which he intended in general to absolve the Jews from the accusation of ritual infanticide, made an exception in the case of Andreas of Rinn, as well as in the case of the martyrdom of Simon of Trent. The two cases were to be considered exceptional events, not to be generalized, but were nevertheless concrete and real:29
    “I therefore admit as true the fact of the sainted Simon, the boy of three years of age killed by Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ in Trent in the year 1475 [...] I accept as true another crime, committed in the village of Rinn, diocese of Bressanone, in 1462, against the sainted Andrea, a boy barbarously killed by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ [...] I do not, however, believe, even admitting as true the true facts of Bressanone and Trent, that one can justifiably deduce that this is a maxim, either theoretical or practical, of the Hebrew nation,
    since two events alone are insufficient to establish a certain and common axiom”.30

    • Replies: @Anon
  13. Tyrion 2 says: • Website
    @Pat Casey

    Don’t be silly. The Talmud is a vast collection of purposefully contradictory attempts to explain the written Torah. This makes the Torah, and the rest of the Old Testament, far more central to Judaism than the Talmud. Your weaselly attempt to avoid admitting this by focussing on his use of the word “most” is utterly irrelevant, especially given the relative importance of the five books of the Torah versus the rest of the Old Testament.

    Not that the Talmud can be described as one work anymore than Wikipedia, including its endless edits pages, could.

    • Replies: @Pat Casey
  14. Sir Q says:

    Many thanks for this great summation. Those of us who’ve researched the subject for years find most of it quite familiar — it’s breathtaking to see it spelled out clearly for all to see here.

    Here’s hoping and praying that your life doesn’t become palpably more difficult as a result of publishing this!

  15. Ron Unz says:
    @academic gossip

    Actually, I’ve responded to her total nonsense over and over again. But I suppose I might as well do so one more time, merely by republishing a previous lengthy comment of mine from a couple of months ago:

    Incidentally, having personally met that “Nurit Baytch” woman when I was giving a talk on my Meritocracy article at the University of Chicago Law School, she seemed an absolutely perfect example of the fanatic “Jewish berserker” type I was discussing in my article. And my Yale Law School lecture had quite a number of them in the audience.

    Otherwise, I’d like to thank many of the other commenters for their very kind words, and also catching a number of my careless typos, which I’ve now corrected.

  16. anon[393] • Disclaimer says:

    Its guys like Unz that makes the JQ a question. A lot of this if not known, its at least sensed and enough is actually known that if not for guys like Unz we would know exactly what to do.The terrible thing is the time we can put off a decision is almost up, ironically accelerated by the people in question, who it seems feel rather confident of late, even eschatonic. Well I’m prepared for whatever form the reaction/restoration takes and if need be and if Unz can make it to North Idaho or I can get a chopper or plane to him Ill see hes protected.

  17. @utu

    To a certain extant we’re all fools, so what’s the point?

    Hitler was that rare leader who, it’s obvious, cared about what was happening to his people, and thought he could do something for their benefit so he probably was a fool in that regard.

    Perhaps, though, you could enlighten us to some other ways he was a fool and name a few others who were not.

  18. Tyrion 2 says: • Website
    @Ron Unz

    You never replied to her substantive points. You merely took the opening superficial rhetoric in her work and made a strawman out of it.

    As I pointed out previously (to no reply):

    Whomever that lady is (it doesn’t matter) applied the same technique that you used to estimate the percentage of Jewish National Merit Semifinalists to the percentage of Jewish Harvard students and found that Hillel was wrong.

    Ergo, you are wrong. Your entire argument is based off the unjustified stats collected by a silly Jewish student organisation to engage in a little ethnic boosterism.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2

    Razib Khan’s conversation with David Sloan Wilson hints at why Ron Unz’s cool, calm collection of information on “Oddities of the Jewish Religion” is necessary, welcome, long overdue, and one more effort at, not so much breaking the Jew taboo but rather, normalizing facts-and-logic based discussion of how one particular group that holds enormous influence over world events, functions.

    Khan remains in the camp of the pusillanimous, desperately eager to “move on:”

    Wilson failed to affirm Khan’s “dark direction. ” “What Kevin said has stood the test of time . . .”
    and expanded:

    Wilson refuses to let go, to the point of introducing the concept, parasitism:

    Wilson seems to endorse the notion of normalizing the frank assessment of various group’s survival strategies; Ron Unz contributes to that project; Razib Khan resists.

  20. @RealAmericanValuesCirca1776Not1965

    “Adding further credibility to the notion that Christianity was created as an anti-Jewish weapon. “

    This reminds me of one of John Carpenter’s lesser known horror movies, a 1987 gem called “Prince of Darkness”. In it, one of the characters makes a discovery that Jesus was a spirit (or possibly an alien!) sent to earth to warn it about and protect it from a very real and literal demon. The Church made the decision to keep this information under wraps, and convince its followers that things such as the Devil, Hell, and evil were abstract concepts rather than a very real manifestation.

    • Replies: @MikeatMikedotMike
  21. Anon[161] • Disclaimer says:

    Any Jewish communities that practice such things today must keep it extremely secret.

    The internal security agencies of Israel might know if these practices go on in Israel but they will cover it up.

  22. @Tyrion 2

    Regardless, from the point at which you say that the Talmud takes precendence to the written Torah (Old Testament), you’ve already jumped into fantasy land.

    You can read the basis for that claim in The online Jewish Encyclopedia

  23. @Hairway To Steven

    Reading this I can’t help but be reminded of a passage written by Adolf Hitler, about the frustration of arguing truthfully with dishonest and purposefully obtuse Jews.

  24. @Anon

    Hitler knew that in order to get what he wanted he had to make his opponents believe that if necessary he would wage war.
    The Polish provocations made it necessary for him to really wage war.
    Poland wanted war, GB not, is my idea, FDR wanted war.

  25. Anonymous[423] • Disclaimer says:

    An individual sociopath in a trust-based society will virtually always “win” his parasitic, extractive and sometimes lethal game because he’s the only one playing it. His targets just want to establish normal, trusting relationships. It has nothing to do with intelligence.

    Interestingly enough, the alleged percentage of sociopaths in Western societies is 2%. That’s what shields them. For every sociopath, there are 49 non-sociopaths who will mostly operate, and experience, relatively normal interpersonal relationships which makes them susceptible.

    Fortunately/unfortunately for the Tribe, their sociopathy is organised and multi-generational. It leads to great material successes in the short-medium term but that inevitably leads to massive blowbacks when their greed and hubris outstrips their stealth capabilities.

    We will. The parasite’s hold on the brain and the endocrine system (authority and messaging) is falling apart.

    • Agree: Svigor
    • Replies: @Wade
  26. Tyrion 2 says: • Website
    @Tyrion 2

    Also, were 10 separate Englishmen to, without contact, write 10 separate independent books picking up parts of English History that might be construed, via the worst possible yet still just about reasonable light, as damning of English behaviour in particular times and particular places. That would be just 10 separate out there books.

    Were someone else to collect all 10 books and summarise them adjacently in order to insinuate some sort of grand narrative which implied essential evil, then that person would be gravely mistaken. Surely they must realise how dishonest their argument would be?

    Why on earth would anyone do such a thing?

    • Replies: @annamaria@Anon@Anon
  27. AaronB says:

    No, it means the gentiles are always starting a war against someone (historically indisputable). And that Jews are always at war with someone. (Historically indisputable). But that both deploy different weapons, according to his capacity and circumstances.

    The clear headed and honest person – .0001 of mankind – recognizes these facts objectively without getting hysterical about them.

    Europeans fight each other incessantly, conquer most of the world – then complain that Jews used cunning, deceit, and the power of money to gain the upper hand over Europeans.

    It’s really quite childish.

    So cheating and scheming are uniquely bad while “honest” physical aggression that kills millions and lays waste to half the earth is “honorable” – its childish.

    The clear headed philosopher understands that the biological world is a war of all against wall, and that cheating is quite as legitimate as physical violence in this war.

    Of course, being a clear headed philosopher means seeing at least one level up from the biological realm – and those stuck in the biological conflict can only see “their side” and cannot attain to objectivity.

    So I hardly expect you to see things from a larger perspective beyond “your side” – nor would it be healthy for you, so long as you are stuck in the biological combat of all against all.

    But there are a tiny few who are poised to tip over into the blissful “extra biological” perspective – I write for this happy few, and do not expect people like you to understand me.

    • Replies: @Anonymous@Svigor
  28. anon[393] • Disclaimer says:

    I know Unz is kinda lefty but in this sense hes far rightish, there really many more jews like him than the lads at stormfront will credit.I have thought as this is all bound to come to a head soon because internet/immigration, a way to avoid another holycause would be to begin now offering jews a way to opt in to whiteness on the record before the shtf, as part of this another option ought to be offered to go on the record as a pledged non combatant in return to safe passage to israel in the event, you cant fault a jew or anyone for group loyalty.But some jews I think really are able to choose loyalty to their white genes over their jew genes and there’s not enough of them and they are 60% euro for us to worry about the hybridization. Thus force the hostile jews declare themselves as such and avoid the nuremberg situation. This registry so to speak would have to be done by jews and would cause quite a stir if it took off, but it might actually end up defusing the coming civil war which is very likely to become a race war if isnt forestalled. Jews coming out in significant enough numbers as white nationalist before hostilities is the only way I see as avoiding war, its in their interest as they will certainly be held accountable for a lot of the wars causes. Wars to not allow for nuance and good people are going to be forced to choose the lesser evil or the greater truth. whites are also going to have to be pragmatic and wont be able to execute half their own for war crimes so a scapegoat will be required. Lets get the actual goats on the record ahead of time and let jews who identify as whites do so and jews who simply loyal but not hostile jews opt out of hostilities.

  29. @Jake

    If you say that only European peoples built a Christian civilization, then is the Jew Testament wrong? Was the Apostle Philip mistaken to recruit Africans into the church? Was the Holy Spirit in error for providing teleporting services afterward? (Acts 8:26-40) Did the first Christians at Antioch commit an error including Simeon the Nigger (Black man) in the church and elevating him to a position of leadership of “prophets and teachers?”

    If, as you say, Jewish culture will always be viciously anti-white Gentile, then why do you worship a viciously anti-white Gentile who railed against Gentile White Patriarchy (Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, Luke 22:25) and demanded one “hate” and “forsake” their own blood and soil?(Luke 14:26, Matthew 19:27-30)

    Is not the Jew Testament itself thoroughly Judaizing?

    WE WORSHIP what we do know, for salvation is from THE JEWS.” John 4:22
    Acts 3:25 “He said to Abraham, ‘Through your offspring all peoples on earth will be blessed.’”
    Romans 1:16 “The Jew first.”
    Romans 9:4 “The people of Israel, chosen.”
    Romans 15:27 “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.”

    • Replies: @Joerg
  30. FKA Max says: • Website
    @academic gossip

    Comments by Mr. Unz on the matter and some of my own as well. Follow the links provided underneath the quoted passages for more in-depth analysis, commentary, etc.:

    • Replies: @ANDYHANDY
  31. Gordo says:

    Thank you Mister Unz.

  32. Pat Casey says:
    @Tyrion 2

    You don’t know what you are talking about and furthermore do not make sense. If the Talmud is about explaining the Torah, why does that make the rest of the Old Testament far more central to Judaism than the Talmud? The only weaselly attempt going on around here is you failing to acknowledge that you didn’t know the Torah is not the Old Testament.

    Jewish tradition says that God dictated the Torah to Moses atop Mt. Sinai. Not so the rest of the Old Testament. So it makes sense that Jews would regard it less.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  33. @TheOldOne

    Why do jews want to control the world ?
    I do not know.
    Why did Baruch bring FDR into politics to start a world war ?
    Why does Soros want to control and change Hungary ?
    Both men were seen as second rate citizens when they were young, Baruch in the USA.
    Soros as a child experienced anti semitism in WWII in Hungary.
    Baruch’s father fled anti semitic Germany around 1870, from memory.
    Their motives, fear, revenge, lust for power, some mixture, I do not know.
    If you read Stephen Steinlight fear does exist.
    And indeed, it cannot be denied that christianity persecuted jews, Islam far less.
    When christian persecution began, suppose no later than when the Roman empire became christian.
    The reformation of Luther was no improvement, Luther seems to have hated jews.
    Just in the 19th century jews became equal civil rights in most countries.
    But, writes Katz, these equal rights were given in the expectation that jews would disappear through assimilation.
    The opposite happened, jews continued to intermarry, had close economic cooperation.
    ‘From prejudice to destruction’, Jacob Katz, 1980, Cambridge MA
    Some jews developed loyalty problems:
    Jakob Wassermann, ‘MEIN WEG ALS DEUTSCHER UND ALS JUDE’, Berlin 1921
    His novel to me seems a great description of how jews felt
    Jakob Wassermann, ‘Die Juden von Zirndorf’, 1897 1999 München
    Of course there were assimilated jews galore, in western countries, most of them sephardic, and anti zionism, what they saw as an insult to them.
    Gilad Atzmon, who describes himself as ‘Palestinian jew’, he was born in Israel, wants collective psychotherapy for all jews.
    As to ritual murder, I nowhere ever saw convincing proof, just accusations.

  34. Art says:
    @Colin Wright

    Second, the article gives the impression that there is some some kind of monolithic Judaism. That’s obviously untrue: Jews are some of the most quarrelsome, dissent-prone folks around.

    That is nonsense – 85% of all Jews of all stripes, 100% of the time, support Zionist Israel and its mendacious occupation of Palestine. The vast majority of US Jews work to use the US government and taxpayer for Israel.

    It is an outrageous lie to say that Jews do not collude politically.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

  35. “Jews spent two thousand years living as a diaspora people, and their tightly-bound trans-national colonies provided them with a uniquely effective international trading network.”


    The most dangerous word for Arabs and Muslims is the word “diaspora” when it refers to Jewish dispersion out of Palestine. Its meaning is not in dispute – that a people known as “Israelite” were dispersed two thousand years ago and their descendants have a “right of turn” to that specific location from which they were dispersed. Therefore, the Arabs have enemies scattered around the world, specially in the Western world, who demand to exercise that “right of return” by force and with the help of the powerful Western nations where these “diaspora people” live. The idea that the white Jews who originated in Europe and the black Jews of Africa and the brown Jews of the Middle East originated in Palestine is totally a childish notion. 95% of world Jewry is Ashkenazi at confirmed DNA of 99% European and 0% Middle Eastern. The sooner we dismiss this fraud called “diaspora”, the more peaceful our world will be.


    ” their tightly-bound trans-national colonies”

    Does anybody know what “colonies” it is referring to?

    • Replies: @Anon
  36. @Anon

    There is an oblique reference to a possible modern-times “blood libel” incident in the BBC series, “The World at War”, one of the best documentaries of WW II I have seen. ( The penultimate episode of that series, “Reckoning (April 1945)”, deals with the aftermath of the war, particularly the continuing mass carnage, involving tens of millions of further deaths, which are ignored in most narratives.

    One incident, described in that episode, involved the return of two young Jewish men from a German concentration camp to their native village in Poland. Shortly after their return, these young men kidnapped and killed a Christian child. The Christian villagers responded with a pogrom in which some seventy odd Jews were killed. There was no further discussion of this incident in this episode of “The World at War”.

    Most of my close friends are Jews. I’d always thought the “blood libel” was superstitious nonsense. But the bare outlines of this post-WW II incident made me re-evaluate that particular personal opinion. This well-documented incident closely paralleled, in its general course, the many stories of “blood libel” incidents from European history and folk lore. A little research confirmed that, although widely separated in time and place, these incidents and even details of these incidents resembled one another markedly. Even a far lesser extent of similar confirmatory evidence for other rumored medieval activities would result in a widespread professional agreement that such activities did occur.

    Another interesting aspect of these stories is that they often hint at pederasty and other sexual perversions. The revelations of perverse sexuality among our “elites”, and particularly Jewish elites, e.g., Harvey Weinstein, Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, to name but a few, suggest that that such perversity may be more common among Ashkenazim than non-Jewish Europeans. Credence is lent this hypothesis by the fact that surveys of sexual behavior in Israel find reported rates of homosexual behavior that are several times higher than in any other country.

    High intelligence does seem to be related to various mental health issues, e.g., depression. I wonder if inbreeding and the cultural selection for high IQ in Ashkenazim, might have had additional negative consequences besides such autosomal recessive disorders as Tay-Sachs disease, Niemann-Pick disease, and Canavan disease. These are all diseases that primarily affect the nervous system. It seems probable to me that less conspicuous malfunctions of the brain, e.g., conditions encouraging abnormal sexual behaviors, might also be more common among Ashkenaz Jews.

    • Replies: @llloyd
  37. ANDYHANDY says:

    Is it??? That is what “they” want us to believe, I did not state it, old newspapers from the 1840′s and 50′s did. The Press was a bit more free then, and truth could actually be spoken then???

  38. ANDYHANDY says:
    @FKA Max

  39. Tyrion 2 says: • Website
    @Pat Casey

    The Torah is the most important part of the Old Testament. According to Judaism it was handed down by God. I said that the Talmud, an endless Jewish squabble on the meaning of the Torah, was less important. You disagreed. You’re wrong.

    • Replies: @Pat Casey@Jared Eliot
  40. ANDYHANDY says:

    Fake quote or not, somebody knew something then???

    • Replies: @Matthew Kelly
  41. Anonymous[281] • Disclaimer says:

    check out Mike King and his books on history. I read 2 of them and they definitely changed my view. At the very least it became clear that the victors write the official history but it is not necessarily the truth.

    Note: Many of his works have been removed from Amazon in a culling that took place a few years ago because they were deemed anti-semitic.

  42. @Andrew Gilbert

    Germany and Italy were the only two developed countries that extricated themselves from the Great Depression without resorting to war. They did this primarily through massive, publicly-funded development of infrastructure, e.g., Hitler’s Autobahn and the related mass production of Volkswagens and Mussolini’s getting the railroads to run on time. Orwell, no fan of the Nazis, admitted that German youths were much healthier than British youths; the former had thrived under the economic and social policies of the Third Reich. Eisenhower, actually emulated Hitler when he became President. It’s rather obvious that the USA’s interstate highway system, which Eisenhower used as a tool to boost the postwar US economy, was modeled on the Autobahn system Eisenhower observed in occupied Germany.

  43. ANDYHANDY says:

    Do jews have to take more heed of their rabbis, than the actual written words of their God??

  44. Heros says:
    @Linh Dinh

    In this article we finally have the substantiation the jewish blood sacrifice is and was necessary for magik and religious ceremonies, and then Lihn comes along with a link to an article with a lying jew statement like:

    Sorry, if jewish neighbors had been murdering your children for thousands of years, then lying about it and then persecuting anyone who found out and wanted to put a stop to it, then those jews DESERVED EVERYTHING that those vile jewish talmudic rabbi’s managed to spit and project at Hitler.

    Child murdering jews, and all those jews who protect them, and all those jews who don’t go to the law to expose these child torturers and murderers, are culpable. In short, all jews have a width and breadth of guilt and shame that makes their beloved “Nazi’s” look like kindergarten teachers.

  45. nickels says:

    I have been in the market for a corroboration of Michael Hoffman’s viewpoint on the religion, and this certainly seems to go as far, even further.

  46. Pat Casey says:
    @Tyrion 2

    O boy this is pointless.

    You mischaracterized what Ron Unz said about the Old Testament by identifying the Torah as the Old Testament. I merely pointed that out, which you thought was “weaselly.”

    I never said the Torah was less important than the Talmud. Many authorities say that it is; I really don’t know if it is or not. But it stands to reason that the rest of the Old Testament is less important than the Talmud. Nor is that a controversial opinion, even if you personally don’t enjoy the Talmud.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  47. “For the last two thousand years, Jews have almost invariably existed as small, relatively weak minorities living in the lands of others, whether Christian or Muslim, so a religious doctrine so unswervingly hostile to outsiders has naturally presented considerable obstacles for peaceful co-existence.”

    a) 95% of world Jewry are Khazar converts who did not convert till the 9th century and therefore they are not those whose ancestors were the ancient Hebrews. They are as European as the rest of the Europeans only whose religion is Judaism.

    b) I think the Jews of Muslims did not face hardly the hatred and animosity the Jews of the Christian West did. The white Jews of the West set themselves apart from the rest of society in the way they dressed, the language they spoke whereas the Jews of the Arab countries were indistinguishable from the rest of the Arabs, they looked like them, spoke the same language, sang the same music, danced Arabic dances and cooked Arabic foods. There was in fact peaceful coexistence among the Jews, Muslims and Christians of the Arab countries.

    c) I am wondering how Jews living in Canada or America or Australia can be considered to live in the countries of others? The Ashkenazi Jews have no other origin except for Europe and if they were dispersed, it was out of Khazaria and not out of Palestine. That has to be made crystal clear.

    • Replies: @Anon
  48. utu says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Tyron 2, perhaps you are confused about being a Jew. You sound more like a Karaite. This is what you get in Rabbinical Judaism concerning Talmud:

    Is Judaism possible w/o Talmud? Karaites did not accept Midrash or Talmud.

    Karaites seem to be strict and do not circumvent rules by using Shabbos goys, so no light on Shabbat means no light.

    Nazis exempted Karaites form their anti-Jewish laws. Some Karaites were accused of collaboration with Nazis but at the same time some were helping to hide Jews from Nazis.

    • Replies: @Grahamsno(G64)
  49. “If nearly all Jews for a thousand or two thousand years were taught to feel a seething hatred toward all non-Jews.”

    Again, you need to say “Ashkenazi Jews” since the Arab Jews did not have “a seething hatred toward all non-Jews”. Arab Jewish children played together, Arab Jews attended Muslim wedding, funerals and other events – and vice versa. Mahmoud Abbas challenged anyone to show him incidents where Arab Jews were discriminated against for just being Jews and he said there were no such incidents. The fact that the more than 100 expulsions of Jews were out of European countries and not Arab countries is the best evidence there is that the European Jews were not hated for being Jews but for their conspiracy to undermine the nations using financial systems.

  50. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:

    What’s truly astounding to me is the large number of stepin fetchit shabbiest goyim in politics, media, universities, et al., who are almost as fanatical as the Jewish berserker types (to borrow Ron Unz’s description) in promoting everything which will destroy their own civilization. How, in God’s name, could they be oblivious to the kind of society they are promoting and the kind of society which their children will inherit?

  51. This is all very interesting, and I would hope that just observing the obvious would be enough for lights to go off in most people. All one has to do is listen to the Jewish media, comics, writers, activists, politicians, etc., to understand the obvious loathing that they have for others, mostly white Christians in the U.S. and Europe. I wouldn’t doubt that there is something sinister and dualistic in the Jewish religion, but it is extremely sad if finding that out is what it would take for non-Jews to understand that they are the declared enemies of Jews just for being alive. At this point, I’m not even sure that most American Christians would act if it were true that many Jews are Satanists.

    Non-religious Jews are often just as toxic as religious Jews, so the whole group and culture seems to be shot through with hostility. Since that’s the case, only an idiot would not oppose organized Jewry, Judaism, Jewish power, the Jewish culture and collective, and a large number of individual Jews. Being anti-Semitic is rational, whereas being anti-Christian, anti-White, anti-other, anti-European, on the part of Jews is, largely just an act of fanatical aggression, especially in America.

  52. @Tyrion 2

    I knew two students of Jacob Neussner ( who planned on being Conservative Jewish rabbis. Over beers one night they told me a story – whether from Talmud, Midrash, Targum, or another source I cannot say. Several rabbis were arguing over a point of Torah. One finally said that if God himself came down and disputed his interpretation he would still hold by it. After a shocked silence, God spoke and commended the rabbi for his understanding of the law. My friends cited this as evidence that proper Jewish doctrine was that for Jews Talmudic interpretation was the final arbiter of correct behavior.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  53. @Mao Cheng Ji

    Trotsky’s family had thirty house servants. He was a millionaire. His father was not a farmer of the land, he was a farmer of peasants, owning villages. As head of the party Lenin’s personal income was yearly in the millions also, in today’s dollars. Many people are out of touch with reality because they want to be.

  54. res says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Direct link to the Kevin MacDonald discussion:

  55. @Hapalong Cassidy

    Although I have not seen Prince of Darkness since the early 90′s, I remember it being one of the top 3 scariest movies I had ever seen, up there with The Omen and The Shining. (The Exorcist being a slightly distant 4th.)

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker

    Ostensibly fake. E.g., from the infallible Wikipedia:

    However, this does not rule it out as being described like that old Rathergate memo: fake, but accurate.

  57. phil says:

    Great article, Ron, but I must insert a complaint about the much ballyhooed chart that you included about labor compensation vs. labor productivity (since 1973). It suggests that worker productivity has progressed steadily, but worked compensation has not. Kevin MacDonald also has fallen for this chart.
    It suggests a “bills on the sidewalk” scenario under which capitalists can hugely profit for decades on end by employing and underpaying productive workers.

    The chart has two grave defects:
    It compares the labor productivity of the ENTIRE LABOR FORCE to compensation for private sector production and nonsupervisory workers
    It uses two different price indexes, one to measure real productivity and another to measure real compensation.

    Overall productivity has continued to progress, but, measured separately, the productivity of production and nonsupervisory workers has not–because, influenced by Jews, the culture rotted. The stagnation in pay that these workers have experienced reflects their stagnant productivity. There is no automatic, easy profit to be had by employing them.

  58. Heros says:
    @Andrew Gilbert

    “Coming wartime plunder” is what the jews were counting on when they declared war on Germany in 1933. Wartime plunder is what germany was paying to jewish banks in the form of reparations, when Hitler came to power and said Nein. So the jews started WWII in order to plunder Germany, France, Poland, and all of central Europe.

    I have been contending for weeks here at that jews, who like to consider themselves “smart”, are really as dumb as jackasses wearing blinders. A glaring example of their willful ignorance would be blood sacrifice, which the majority of jews think is, and Unz still hints at just to feed their willful denial, is a “Christian Superstition”.

    Even though their tribe has clearly regularly been murdering and torturing infants over the centuries and then trading their blood and organs for profit, Jews simply don’t want goyim to know that they know. Clearly, neither does Andrew Gilbert, a “Jew raised in the Reform tradition”, who is, typically for a heeb, afraid to even mention the jews greatest achievement: rituals and sacrifices with goyim infants. Hundreds of different types.

    If he really believed Blood Sacrifice is false, and an extreme slander, then Gilbert should have been indignant. Or, he knows but he lies. Like Eli Weasel’s “It happened in my mind”, or in Gilberts case “There was never blood sacrifice in my mind”.

    • Troll: utu
  59. @Colin Wright

    Colin Wright—Appendix D to Robert Wilton’s The Last Days of the Romanovs (1920) lists the members of the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party, the Extraordinary Commission and the Council of Commissars, along with their ethnicities. Wilton writes, ‘According to the data furnished by the Soviet Press, out of 566 important functionaries of the Bolshevik State, there were…457 Jews.’ The appendix begins on page 184, HERE.

  60. The Germans never referred to themselves as ‘Nazis.’

    It’s a certain group who keeps that word alive and front and center.

    Now, who could that be?

    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @Olorin

Komentari na prvi clanak! - #180-#240 ....


  1. annamaria says:

    Don’t’ project your dissatisfaction with your insignificance on the highly accomplished Unz. If you believe in your knowledge and intelligence, try to refute the article point by point. Otherwise, you look small.

    • Agree: Ace
  2. @Ron Unz

    that “Nurit Baytch” woman

    LOL, “That Woman”, cute, cute …..

  3. annamaria says:

    Please, present your own Weltanschauung, in the context of this article, so that we could assess and compare your intellectual honesty and courage with Unz’ intellectual honesty and courage.

    • Replies: @utu
  4. annamaria says:
    @Andrew Gilbert

    “But your claims that “our media pundits regularly identify Putin as ‘the new Hitler’” seems largely untrue.”
    – How “largely?” The MSM has been on Clinton’s site and it broadcasted on many occasions Mrs. Clinton’ casual definition of Putin as “the new Hitler.” This is despite Clinton’s “leadership position” during the 2014 putsch in Kiev. The putsch has led to the revival of neo-Nazism in Ukraine. Add to that the Israeli government’s arming of the neo-Nazis (hey, Bibi Mielkovsky!)
    All this squealing from the nazi-hunters of Wiesenthal center and the ADL-affiliated thugs is just a noise to cover the stupendous immorality of zionists. The documented collaboration between zionists and neo-nazis is just another confirming evidence of the evil nature of Zionism. Had not Zionism preceded Nazism and served as a blueprint for the brownshirts?

  5. Tyrion 2 says: • Website
    @Pat Casey

    Unz’s point was to insinuate into the reader’s mind that Judaism, contra popular perceptions, is actually alien to Christianity and that some weird canon called the Talmud is far more inportant than the Old Testament.

    This is a disingenuous sleight of hand which you have abetted. Even if unknowingly.

    The five most important books of the Old Testament are read through every year on a cycle. They are absolutely the most important literature.

    Recognising this fact disables Unz’s insinuation. It renders his statement a pointless half-fact.

    At best, everything else you have brought up is my fault for being unclear and a bit fuzzy in my expression. At worst, you have been arguing in bad faith in order to further irrational hatred of Jews.

    I am happy to accept either and, if the first, I am sorry. I am not so bright, as Ron likes telling me.

  6. annamaria says:
    @Andrew Gilbert

    Sorry for the incorrect “Agree”

  7. AaronB says:

    I have zero doubt this is his motivation. But that is not necessarily a bad motivation, and one cannot remain stuck in resentment and spite forever. Most anti semitism has personal causes. I too soured on Jews as a result of bad personal experiences. But then I dealt extensively with ambitious whites, and regained perspective lol.

    As one of the only groups in the West that are still highly ambitious and motivated, one is bound to encounter much bad behavior among Jews. Ambition breeds bad behavior – this was as true among renaissance Italians and 18th empire building Britons as it is among Jews today. I forget which British lord declared that one cannot be great without being bad. That man understood life.

    But as personal feelings fade and intelligent perspective is restored, as wider experience and reading acquaints one with the horrors of European history, the Jewish situation loses its uniqueness as it gets situated in the wider human context, and is seen as nothing special.

    • Replies: @iffen@Felix-Culpa
  8. Tyrion 2 says: • Website
    @Jus' Sayin'...

    The only thing which that story means is that we should always try to actively understand things rather than glibly taking whatever we instinctively land on as the first meaning as fact.

    This is the foundation of civilisation.

    It is good advice but it doesn’t imply what you think it implies. It also implies that critically engaging as an individual with all religious texts is crucial. Indeed, the results of your critical engagement would actually be the most important.

  9. @Sloopyjoe

    “I would like to take the readers on a little journey a bit further back in time in regards to the origination of the Jewish Religion, as well as, Christianity and Islam. First a short video:”

    “Here is the article and Author from which this originates ( I would encourage the readers to read the other well researched and very enlightening articles by scholar, Ashraf Ezzat):”

    Usually it is said that Mohammad copied all the stories from Bible but got them wrong. So, everyone dismisses Mohammad stories.

    For example, Kabbah in Mecca, Saudi Arabia was build by Abraham and his son Ismael. Where is Egypt and where is Saudi Arabia. How did Abraham wound up in Saudi Arabia?

    In “Misquoting Jesus” the author claims that he has taken the effect of Greek Language on the New Testament. Why is New Testament not in Hebrew or Aramaic?

    It is claimed that Torah, the first five books in TaNaKh (Old Testament) were given to Moses in written form. The Semitic language including Hebrew were not evolved enough to be put anything in written form.

    In fact, when the Quran was revealed, no Semitic Language were evolved enough including Arabic, to put the Quran in written form. The first Quran which was put in written form by the Third Caliph Usman was in Old (Modern) Arabic without vowels and lacked dots for the letters. For example, letter “B” has a dot below the moon, and letter “N” has a dot over the moon, so how can one distinguish between letters. No dots in the first written Quran.

    Seventy five years after Mohammad demise the Quran was put in proper Arabic called, Quranic Arabic or Classical Arabic. TaNaKh until 12th centuries only had constant words without vowels, just like the first written Quran. The vowels added to TaNaKh through 12th to 15th century from Quranic Arabic.

    Jesus spoke Aramaic to his disciples not Hebrew. Hebrew was revived in early 20th century from Arabic.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  10. rotekz says: • Website

    A PDF full English translation including all 27 chapters of Solzenitsyn’s ‘ Two hundred Years together’ can be downloaded here:!iK4XBKbA!tzVBkH71Xg0l4R4WaqbvFnsMw7-Cs9JiWWPe4I0DUnQ

  11. El Dato says:

    Ron meets Rabbi Cohen:

    (Sadly the part where the Rabbi gets told that he just isn’t pure enough to get the Name of God isn’t in that clip)

    As for the economic prowess of the Hitler Regime, that’s kinda over the top.

    The von Mises Institute (actually Rothbard Institute amirite) has a nice PDF of a book from said epoch. No, I wouldn’t want to have done business there. Actually it’s all one wants to fight in today’s “free-market” economy, multiplied. But at this point in time, multiplied only by a small factor, alas.

    The Vampire Economy: Doing Business Under Fascism

    The economy was a Potemkin Village maintained by the State, not producing goods that the people want but goods that the State wants. German Juché allied to War Economy.

  12. annamaria says:

    What are your credentials of a researcher and statistician to contest the Unz article on the meritocracy? All you are showing, for now, is an irritation of a displeased “eternal victim.”
    Show us numbers and arguments to support your “the truth does not matter.” Otherwise, you are just a petty slanderer.

  13. @SimplePseudonymicHandle

    Not being an American & not having a stake in the game, I agree & disagree with some points.

    First, I agree with Spinoza that in a free society a man speaks what he thinks, and thinks whatever he wants. Some will be offended, but it is the price of liberty. No “hate speech”, no muzzle… I’m allergic to it.

    Then, it is true that all stereotypes tend to become cartoons. As Orwell observed, the fact that Chinese are gamblers & English- hypocrites, tells us something about these collectives. Social & humanist “sciences” like sociology, cultural anthropology, historiography, social psychology, ethnopsychology, cultural history….try to analyze & describe group stereotypes rationally & empirically.

    Ron Unz, on the other hand, as far as his pubic persona is concerned, is a journalist & socio-political commentator with ambition to make it in a wider society & media. He’s, like most Americans, a doer, not a thinker & he doesn’t care about historical or philosophical abstractions. He wants to provoke, but also to see what the world is really like.

    In other words- ruin the sacred truths. I may agree or disagree with some of his contentions, but I’m all for freedom & open discourse. Staleness & orthodoxies are signs of decrepitude & weakness.

  14. JessicaR says:
    @DB Cooper

    Not only is this true about the upside down t instead of a plus sign, some of the ultra-Orthodox do this in America as well. However, the modern Orthodox tend to think this is nuts.

  15. mark green says:
    @D. K.

    Government agencies (including the US Census Bureau) are prohibited from asking questions about Jewishness and/or Jewish ancestry. Jews are not allowed to be counted or monitored in the US. They are a special if not protected class in this regard. (Surprised?)

    Only Jewish groups seem to know exactly who is Jewish and what the numbers of Jews (or ‘part Jews’) exist in America.

    Since Jews are not like other ethnic or racial groups in the way that they are counted and/or identified, there may be millions of quasi-Jewish gentiles (individuals with some Jewish heritage) as well as others who possess a strong religious identification with Israel and/or Jewish teachings.

    Their precise numbers are unknown and will probably remain so.

    I suspect however that there are far more crypto-Jews out there than is commonly acknowledged by many ‘experts’.

    Deception is a big part of their modus operandi. The nebulous but tightly-organized ‘Jewish community’ in America shares hard data about itself only when it suits them.

    • Replies: @Heros@Wally
  16. Mr. Unz,

    Brilliant piece! I greatly admire your courage , intellect and work ethic. Rabbinical Talmudic Judaic philosophy is a menace and demonic evil that needs to be exposed and defeated. Let Truth, wisdom, peace, love and honesty prevail and shed light on the darkness.

    • Agree: annamaria
  17. annamaria says:

    “… I have had Jews tell me that Jews cheat, but gentiles murder…”
    – The Wars for Israel have produced, so far, some four million dead, including thousands and thousands of children of all ages. Iraq is in ruin. Libya is in ruin. Syria is in ruin. The fish-tank of the Gaza Ghetto is another story. More:

    • Replies: @AaronB
  18. Art says:

    More mendacious Jew troublemaking – sorry gentiles – “forget peace.”

    It is interesting to watch the Jew dominated America Deep State attacking Trump today for attempting to make peace with Putin.

    Fox, CNN, MSNBC, Republicans and Democrats are all attacking him. It is total condemnation – dare he make peace and upset the Jew endless conflict agenda of ceaseless division.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Maintain Hope, Life, Love, Truth, & Idealism — Art

    • Replies: @RobinG
  19. AaronB says:
    @Tyrion 2

    There is some truth to the claim that the Talmud is more important than the Torah in Jewish religion – but the Torah remains hugely significant and is read and reread and studied every day and weekend, and it is in some sense primary. It is certainly interwoven with Jewish practice, high holidays, and life in general in a very integral way.

    There may be some extreme Hasidic sects which neglect the Torah completely, I wouldn’t know. But that’s certainly not typical.

    I don’t think Unz is lying – he just isn’t intellectually equipped to handle complex pre – modern material. He’s a computer scientist by trade if I understand correctly – this will create certain mental limitations, just as the study of mathematics will.

    Such people tend to produce simplified linear narratives without much shade or nuance or intellectual complexity. Science, math, etc – these are more like practical trades than intellectual disciplines.

    But Unz’s heart is surely in the right place.

    Back to the Talmud, all religions have extensive commentary without which they cannot be properly understood – again this is hardly unique to Jews! Muslims with their Hadiths, Christians with their vast theological corpus, and even Buddhist Sutras traditionally are not meant to be read without clarifying commentaries, which can be quite extensive.

    Primary sacred texts tend to be terse, aphoristic, poetic, contradictory, and highly ambiguous, often employing sacred language that is not immediately clear.

    A certain amount of mysticism is integral to a sacred texts – they are not computer manuals 

    Trying to make sense of a pre modern culture using the categories of modern thought is bound to produce a caricature, or break down in incomprehension, or lead to charges of bad faith or ludicrous attempts to understand them in Darwinian terms as elaborate strategies of deception for materialistic gain.

  20. Two short sentences explain nearly everything about current events: “Nothing has been forgotten” and “It’s payback time.”

  21. Anonymous[423] • Disclaimer says:

    No. By your (“jewish friends”) own logic Gentiles are only dangerous when at war while the Tribe should be exterminated once for all because they never stop. I’d rather die in a battle – protecting my progeny – than succumb to slow, parasitic poison.

    The white race doesn’t want to fight your ME, African and WW3 wars for you anymore. And we certainly don’t want to be replaced by the “refugees” from those areas. We can clearly see that the same (((people))) are behind both dynamics and your time is running out… again.

    Fasten your seatbelt, Aaron.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  22. @jacques sheete

    Superb piece of work!

    It is not really “Calf Worshiper”. It is “Cow Worshiper”.

    The gold was being saved to buy a particular “Cow” for worship, however in the absence of Moses a “Golden Calf” was built and worshiped until such time the “Cow” is purchased with the gold.

    For this reason, chapter 2 of the Quran is called, “Cow”.

    Quran also tells us that Jews used to worship “Aziz” as Son of God, before “Jesus” being worshiped as Son of God as Ron mentions other gods being worshiped….

  23. Art says:

    Of course he did not.the truth does not matter on the edge of uranus,just the lube.

    Oh my’ – mcohen discloses another repetitive deep subject of the Talmud – scatology.

  24. annamaria says:

    Do you reject all and any research on the touchy matters of Talmudism?
    Ron Unz has shown a tremendous intellectual integrity and courage. But since this integrity and courage do not agree with certain politically correct dogmas, you found it convenient to overlook the exceptional personal qualia of Ron Unz.
    What about Hannah Arendt? Was she also too much on a side of western civilization instead of following blindly the Talmudic dictums?
    Have you heard about Baruch Spinoza? His remains are still outside of a Jewish cemetery. But your war criminals Yitzhak Shamir, Menachem Begin, and Ariel Sharon were buried, as the pious zionists, on a Jewish cemetery. Remember Shatila Massacre:

  25. Pat Casey says:
    @Tyrion 2

    I think it’s very obvious that you are minimizing the Talmud more than Ron is minimizing the Old Testament.

    Go back to my first comment, which Ron highlighted. MOST of the Old Testament comes after the Torah. That’s what Ron was referring to when he said “most of the Old Testament.”

    You have not given a straight answer on that point: is the Old Testament minus the Torah more important to traditional Jews than the Talmud?

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  26. iffen says:

    Most anti semitism has personal causes.

    If you are saying that most anti-Semitism springs from interpersonal interactions between the anti-Semite and a Jew, then I think that is manifestly incorrect. If you are saying that the anti-Semite views the behavior (real and imagined) of Jews as a personal threat, then I can agree.

    I am little confused by your first sentence. Do you mean that it could play absolutely no part in his motivation.

    • Replies: @AaronB@Wally
  27. Wally says:

    “… not only is German(y) allowed to commit all this evil …”

    Except Germany did not “commit all” that alleged “evil”, as has been demonstrated repeatedly by Revisionists at this site

    But hey, consider the source.

    • Replies: @utu
  28. AaronB says:

    Agreed. That’s why I say the choice of weapon is dictated by circumstance and need, and can easily change.

  29. utu says:

    Would you object to being called Homo Sapiens too? Because of the homo part or because of the sapiens part?

  30. AaronB says:


    Biological life just is a war of all against all. If your group can exterminate Jews, go for it. My money is on Jewish survival.

    Oh, I’m sure Jewish fortunes will suffer setbacks “again” – just like every group does, just like any European or Asian country has. There is nothing unique with Jews.

    But the war goes on, and Jews will rise again.

    From my perspective and that of many Jews I know, Jews now are a greatly sinning people, and are due for a drastic correction. It will happen, and Jews will be chastened – for a time.

    But I think the Jewish formula has vindicated itself – and there is something good there beneath the dirt. Not for nothing did Jesus emerge from the Jews.

    • Replies: @Hamlet's Ghost@Dumbo
  31. Interesting bit in the article about blood libel. I used to take it for granted that those were all made up. But many years ago I read the excellent biography of Queen Isabella by William Thomas Walsh. There was a whole chapter dedicated to the matter of the Holy Child of La Guardia (the blood libel incident which more than anything else led to the Jews’ expulsion from Spain). I remember Walsh laying out a convincing case that the ritual murder did in fact occur. It’s been awhile though and I don’t remember the details.

  32. Wally says:

    “Frankly, I am surprised and disappointed that Ron Unz, who runs a remarkably truthful site with real freedom of speech and true difference of opinion, is contributing to that deception.”

    You mean the “deception” you have failed to substantiate?

    As if pointing out a few shabbas goys and not their handlers is somehow credible.

    Who cares if Solzhenitsyn was a great literary master. It’s what he said that matters, not how he said it.

    I sense you may be one of the little helpers:

    How Israel and Its Partisans Work to Censor the Internet

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
  33. Heros says:
    @mark green

    Throughout history the influence of cryptos has been substantial and uniformly negative. This recent Kelly/Atwell podcast about SA and the Boer War reveals that Cecil Rhodes was crypto and gave all his fortune to Rothschild family and a secret society scholarship. More proof of winston being crypto is revealed, about how Churchill’s father had been deeply involved in South Africa on behalf of the Rothschilds in the late 1800′s, and that Winston had been in SA surveying his fathers co-investments with the Rothschild in SA during the Boer War. Crypto Churchill was manufactured into a war hero in circumstances that plainly mirror John Kerry, the Crypto, Skull and Bones, who very weirdly was made into a Swift boat hero JFK cutout. As usual, Tim and Joe tie it all back to the craft and even discuss communications between freemasons in London and Amsterdam at the height of the boer conflict.

  34. AaronB says:

    No, I mean I agree with your explanation of Ron’s motivation. Sorry for the confusion.

    There are probably different kinds of anti-semites, and different causes for it. But a substantial portion of anti-semites I believe are normal people who have had consistently negative interactions with Jews, perhaps not realizing they are a distinct identity group and not merely “whites” , and not understanding they were in a battle that by historical norms is quite normal and ordinary, and that their own group engages in as well.

    This kind of anti-Semitism lacks historical, human, and personal perspective and is very emotion driven – but it is quite understandable. I myself succumbed to it. It does not necessarily last. People grow up.

    • Replies: @iffen@Anon
  35. bj says:
    @Andrew Gilbert

    “but many of the practices and superstitions you cite don’t seem very different from contemporaneous Christianity.”

    Jesus said, “Love your neighbor as yourself.”

    The Jew said, “Your neighbor is your slave.”

    You sir, are a liar!

  36. Tyrion 2 says: • Website
    @Pat Casey

    Is what I have written below incorrect? (I have little interest in pedantic obfuscations behind the word “most” – again – if I led you to that particular point, I am sorry)


    Unz’s point was to insinuate into the reader’s mind that Judaism, contra popular perceptions, is actually alien to Christianity and that some weird canon called the Talmud is far more important than the Old Testament.

    This is disingenuous sleight of hand which you have abetted. Even if unknowingly.

    The five most important books of the Old Testament are read through every year on a cycle. They are absolutely the most important literature.

    Recognising this fact disables Unz’s insinuation. It renders his statement a pointless half-fact.

    Cliff notes versus actual text. Talmud versus Torah. Ultimately, what matters is your understanding of the Torah, which the Talmud may aid you with.

    I don’t do Theology personally. Mine may be partially summarised below:

    God gave us reason so that we may work to understand creation. Torah is an important part of creation. The Talmud is a collective attempt to understand it. As are all great works of literature and science.

  37. utu says:


    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
  38. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    It’s very true. It’s mentioned in a lot of sources and a Mizrahi mafia Jew I know now living in America confirmed it when I asked him.

    So did another Israeli immigrant I know confirm it when I asked her.

    It’s also why the Israeli early zionists refused to wear ties back in the early + mid 20 th century when most men wore suits and ties except when doing manual work.

    The long part of a tie resembles the Christian cross too much. Muslims do the same, no ties especially in Muslim countries.

    Different cultures, different customs.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  39. anon[107] • Disclaimer says:

    Not hard to believe.

    In a lecture on New Testament, Amy Jill Levine recounted a cockamamie tale she told her child to explain away the Christian significance of the Cross atop a building on the campus where she taught, Emory University. Emory was founded by Methodist Episcopal Church. It’s since become, um, less Christianish.

    Emory is also home to Deborah Lipstadt, Reality Denialist. ™

  40. bj says:
    @academic gossip

    Hillel says Jews are 11% undergraduate and 67% graduate students at Harvard University.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  41. utu says:

    Sorry, Koneczny had no access to CODOH. He wrote it during the war before all the Codohites were born.

  42. Tyrion 2 says: • Website

    Karaites are a tiny sect of fundamentalists who believe in taking everything in the Torah absolutely literally and in the most simplistic way possible.

    This is a pretty difficult way to follow a religious source text and leads to some strange things. It is also the abandonment of reason.

    Imagine I said to you to get up from your bed and go downstairs to eat breakfast every morning as it will keep you healthy. Say everyone lives in a two floor house with the kitchen below the bedroom.

    Then you moved to a single floor flat. Now, were you a Karaite, you might need to make your breakfast, pack it up and go find some steps to walk down before you can eat. The Talmud is a collection of other people’s thoughts on what is actually important about the original instruction and is supposed to help you to avoid silly situations like that.

    • Replies: @utu@Jared Eliot@Karl
  43. AnonFromTN says:

    You are in the habit of asking everyone to prove things. How about you heeding your own advice and presenting some proof that those “shabbas goys” I named have Jewish handlers, rather just than being scum independently? I am all ears.

    FYI, I have no dog in this fight, but, being a scientist, I prefer proof to hot air any day of the week, and twice on Sundays.

  44. annamaria says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Are you talking to yourself, Tyrion 2?
    You have been corrected on Torah, and you were told in plain English that Nurit Baytch is a zionist fanatic that produces nonsensical “research.” For instance, Ms. Baytch fervently believes (as the “most victimized” and “the most suffering” one) that “Jews are the most underrepresented group at Harvard.”
    She has an agenda, and she goes berserk as soon as she registers any kind of critique of ziocons and Israel. She also believes that Zionism and Judaism are the same. Perhaps, you should send her these links:

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  45. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mick Jagger gathers no Mosque

    So the blood was dried to a powder for long term storage. I wonder how much of it was really human blood and how much was animal blood collected at the local butcher shop.

  46. Tyrion 2 says: • Website

    It seems unlikely to be for religious reasons since they were mostly secular socialist utopians, as were the government of Sweden.

    • Replies: @Anon
  47. AnonFromTN says:

    Nice to meet you! I am AnonFromTN. How is the weather in Kryzhopol?

    (For those who don’t know Ukrainian geography and Russian, Kryzhopol is a city in Ukraine, whereas “zhopa” in Russian means ass in the US, or arse in the UK).

  48. Anon[694] • Disclaimer says:

    If slavery hundreds of years ago involving all religions was bad , imagine modern slavery is far worse. Modern slavery is an Islamist practice . Top slavery states 2018:

    Islamic republic of Mauritania -20% of the population are slaves
    Islamist regions of Nigeria- Kidnapping and slaving of Christian girls commonplace
    Islamic republic of Sudan – rampant slavery and rape – janjaweed
    Slave markets in Libya, Somalia, Iraq,Syria.

    • Replies: @annamaria@Them Guys
  49. iffen says:

    I believe are normal people who have had consistently negative interactions with Jews

    Some people are like the cat that sat down on the hot stove.

  50. Tyrion 2 says: • Website
    @Bob who is of bad white stock

    Klaus Friedrich is not a typical Jewish name. Who is he? Other than the supposed puppet-master of Hillary Clinton? Don’t strings tend to be controlled by the person with a few orders of magnitutde more power? Or, is it always the Jew in your worldview? Or in this case, probably not even a Jew but just the one with a name that confused you…

  51. utu says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Perhaps you should rather concentrate on positives in Karaites like for example that they do not hate gentiles. I do not care how you or they eat breakfast but I do mind the hate thing. Your hate and your dishonesty come from Talmud.

    • Troll: Tyrion 2
  52. @Bardon Kaldian

    I agree. I happen to believe that the only way that all the worst speculations and conspiracy theories stand to stand, in the presence of bright sunlight, cleansing agents and open discourse – is if there were any truth to them. That won’t stop the “trigger effect”, one outcome of which is a thousand points of blowback – from all directions, to shut the thing down. That’s too bad because they wouldn’t stand.

    Otherwise I think we probably do not need to have this painful discussion if we did some very simple reforms – here in the US where we do have the stakes – namely: ban collection of racial or gender identification information for employment or educational admissions purposes, except for African Americans who self-identify as such.

    Do that – and all of this goes away like a first degree burn under cold water. Standing between here and there though is a long minefield and a giant political army.

    • Replies: @utu
  53. @utu

    See my response to Bardon’s reply. Thanks.

  54. Tyrion 2 says: • Website

    Unz used one way of working out the number of Jews who were suitable to attend Harvard and a different way to estimate the percentage of Jews at Harvard.

    Baytch made the methods consistent and the results invalidated Unz’s conclusions.

    It was all quite simple and Unz has ignored this very substantive counter-argument and preferred to create strawmen or just insult Baytch instead.

    As you have here too.

    My last post was an analysis of how Unz built up his argument for this article. It is not relevant to the above but I do believe that it captures what Unz has done and that it shows why the article is pernicious. You may disagree but please do try harder to stay on point than your last post.

    • Replies: @D. K.@annamaria
  55. Anon[694] • Disclaimer says:

    Most recent studies found Ashkenaz to be 47% levant 53% Europe.

    Ashkenazi Jews are not 95% but 45%.

    Seems Muslims are incapable of peace regardless of Israel.

    Please explain how Israel caused Indonesian to invade Papua in 1963 , collonize , occupy to this day and genocide 500,000 + Papuans.

    How did Israel cause Indonesia to invade and genocide East Timor ?

    Why are muslims killing Hindus in India, Christians in Philippine, Nigeria, Egypt, Libya , France , Germany , UK, USA , Canada , Australia ,Russia , Indonesia ,Bhuddists in China , Myanmar , Thailand , And other muslims in every territory they occupy ?

  56. Tyrion 2 says: • Website

    Hillel have been smoking crack .

    • Replies: @utu@annamaria
  57. @Tyrion 2

    “Karaites are a tiny sect of fundamentalists who believe in taking everything in the Torah absolutely literally and in the most simplistic way possible.”

    Why you keep insisting calling the TaNaKh (Old Testament) as Torah. Why are you trying to confuse everyone?

    You very well know that Torah is the first five chapters of TaNaKh (Old Testament)?

    • Replies: @Them Guys
  58. LSJohn says:
    @Seamus Padraig

    regarding comment #77

    I like the way you think.

    There are things in this piece I couldn’t believe from anyone but Ron. I’ve come to trust his research and analysis as much or more than my own.

    Wait. Is he a Jewish publisher?

    Crap. What do I do now? ;>)

  59. Anon[694] • Disclaimer says:

    Poor takkiyah ,so many errors . Khazar was debunk so many times . Jews have zero khazar relation. Ashkenazi are not 95% of Jews but 45% .

    Muslims cannot get along with anyone , even themselves. 130 killed in Paki suicude bombings just this week. Ishmael , a wild donkey , his hand against everyone(including himself). A fulfilled prophesy from genesis.

    • Replies: @annamaria

Komentari na prvi clanak! - #240 -# 300....

  1. It was well worth reading the comments and another recent article. Just to see deeply into human nature…

    Lots of people here try to put an academic veneer on their antisemitism. Comparatively small details are exploded into things like claiming the Holocaust didn’t happen. The genocidal work of the Einsatzgruppen, the endless lists, the dates marked, the deportation of the Hungarian Jews… the National Socialist state must have gone to a really great length to write things down that didn’t happen, to run trains to nowhere, and to relocate people… for what? Did they just vanish?

    Some people here brainwashed themselves into believing pretty much anything. I readily agree that official history is censored and not accurate. But the weak arguments brought forward here are often so self-serving and circular. For example: Did Hitler order the genocidal murder of the Jews? We find no written order, and Irving is glorified for relying only what is written. Even Raul Hilberg is quoted that one could not mount a case against Hitler… through writing alone. Even if you believe that Hitler never gave that order – and that’s like saying a dictator would make sure to leave a paper trial of his more risky decions – the Holocaust happened. There’s too much evidence, too many witnesses, there’s too big a trail of paper and accounts of all kinds… but there will be people here who only will spot one or two inconsistencies in the narrative and jump up and say “It didn’t happen.” Which would be intellectually dishonest if those people were actually capable of reviewing the evidence in an unbiased manner.

    No, there must be a bogeyman to history, and here in this comment section it is unsurprisingly the same as always: the Jew. This is nothing new, the same antisemitism is at work as ever. There is a conspiracy, and it must be uber-evil. And anything a sectarian person is expanded on every other person of that religion and heritage by projection. And all evidence to the contrary is ignored. Obsessive dissection of historical research leads to producing a case or two where apparently Jews had committed the crimes they had been accused of, and this is taken as if everything else uttered by antisemites must be true as well. Because the uber-evil must be exposed and be shown to be behind everything, this convenient explanation for everything in the world absolving others of their responsibility and rendering whites and “gentiles” into the role of victims.

    Ron Unz, the people that congratulate you here on your honesty are the people that have lured you by selective omission down into an antisemitic trap. Even if you were absolutely correct about the existence of a sect of Judaic belief that would believe essentially worship evil you would not prove that this is prevalent as you think. It’s as if taking the excess and worst of any culture in history and simply saying “That’s what you really are.” and pinning it on all member of it. And that’s intellectually dishonest.

    I don’t buy the whole “I’m no expert on it” shtick simply because it always comes conveniently next to something incendiary. I think it’s mostly rhetoric to avert criticism.

    I read a fair deal on this website but it has become a home base for some deeply intellectually dishonest racists who jump on any opportunity to malign blacks, Jews, and whoever else seems convenient. There’s a sick underbelly to this and several columnists here get to wear contributions like Tom Engelhardt’s as a figleaf for their own discredited ideas. They just can keep selectively quoting and misrepresenting research and then conclude they were right all along, and in many cases you have to sift through dozens of comments until somebody takes the ill-conceived omissions apart and actually adds the information that was omitted – like with Fred Reed repeating that he does not understand how something as complex as the eye could evolve by itself and then congratulating himself on his wildly oversimplified “understanding” of the matter.

    Take for example your misrepresentation of Hitler’s economic “peace time” policies. If you had read the book “Hitler’s Soldiers” that I started reading because of a mention on your own website you would find a well-documented account of how these policies were really just meant to gear up for a war to be started in the 1940s. One person here claimed this was all not detrimental due to an internal barter system but the reality is this is not true. Germany had to import to sustain this rearmament and imports cannot be paid by internal fantasy money, at least not in the 1930s. The Germans had to start their expansion into Austria and Czechoslovakia and elsewhere because they would have been broke else. The German war machine would have broken down without further countries to plunder, without taking the money of the Jews, without incorporating the stockpiles of other nations, and so on. It was a sort of pyramid scheme that kept going by escalating the war further. Germany was burning through its own and the continent’s substance to keep this pyramid scheme going. The logical conclusion was the utilization of widespread slave labor during the war.

    This is just one example of how it’s not hard to find out more about this topic. There’s a strong internal logic, there’s a lot of well-researched evidence, based on the accounts of various part of the state itself. This reminds me of another article here on the site which claimed it was German ingeniousness that allowed German production to peak in 1944. But this was basically the height of German slave labor where whole factories were moved underground by exploiting human beings until they died. This is what I mean by intellectual dishonesty – by omission. By not looking for the real causes of things.

    The people that congratulate you are not looking for intellectual honesty. They want their biases confirmed. They applaud anyone with any reach coming out and speaking as they do. They gladly overlook any inconsistencies in your narrative because they like the company. Whereas they gladly point out the smallest inconsistency in anybody else’s that does not fit their picture.

    There has been a lot of deliberate lies and propaganda in the 20th and 21st century. But to go down the rabbit hole of looking for world-endangering evil by postulating it stems from some fringe beliefs in the Jewish religion is equivalent to believing in magical explanations. Some elites and the government of Israel may have disproportionate influence – and they abuse it, like so many people of power and influence do. But to go the simple route and just postulate an evil religion breeding evil behaviors is magical thought in a complex world with many different factions vying for power.

    I, for example, am German. I do neither believe Putin is the new Hitler, nor do I hold illusions about his fundamental goodness. I think he might be the politician that Russia needs to survive. And maybe the planet also needs him as a counter-balance. I see the official narrative is contrived but that doesn’t mean the opposite is true either. The truth is nuanced and deep and we might never fully get to know it. But simple narratives are almost inevitably wrong.

    If you look for the root of evil in the world by looking at some version of the Talmud or by looking at Qabbalists, you look for magical explanations. The reality has probably a lot more to do with plain old human nature, greed, and also tribal rivalities. The main failure of antisemitism is to project simple explanations on a complex world. The fact that there are influential, powerful Jews doesn’t prove their views right. It just means that is part of an even greater picture – and that picture is not one simply solved by following one line of thought like a monomaniac. It’s not solved by learning more details about a Jewish sect, or by proving there were some odd cases of religiously motivated murder. These are distractions from the truth and not the truth. This falling into the deepest bias possible: a closed worldview that just keeps reasserting itself.

    I enjoy the ability to read diverse views on this site. But its increasing antisemitic and racist tendencies will undo it. Hate speech is often masquerading as free speech. If it hides behind bad science and omission it just becomes a more insidious poison.

  2. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    It did happen. It probably was rare, mostly because of fear of the local governments prosecuting the murderers for murder with enhancements of child abuse and witch craft.

    Many religions practiced human and animal sacrifice. Right into the 1800s European and even some American construction workers sacrificed a small animal like a squirrel or rabbit and buried it in the foundations of the building.

    Even 2 + 3 rd generation Chinese scientists believe trees in streets and front yards are bad luck and either cut them down or if there is some city or HOA restriction on cutting down trees dump gallons of pesticide on the roots.

    There’s no difference between a mezzuah in the door jamb and a corn dolly in the window.

    Jews have kidnapped, tortured and murdered Christians and used their blood in religious rituals.

    School desegregation, school busing affirmative action and the enabling of rampant black crime and the destruction of our great cities were funded by Jewish organizations and effected by mostly Jewish attorneys.

    • Troll: Tyrion 2
    • Replies: @Mulegino1@attilathehen
  3. mcohen says:


    This article is click bait.some people like pretty women others like stories about hollywood and some like “the jews”.

    Ron unz based defence of his stats in some of his meritocracy studies of harvard students on a haaretz article.

    Chopped liver and christian blood mixed in with meritocracy studies.

    Shake and bake and out popped a ronnie brownie


    • Replies: @annamaria
  4. Peasant says:
    @Andrew Gilbert

    ‘I can’t say, but many of the practices and superstitions you cite don’t seem very different from contemporaneous Christianity’

    So you are not an expert on ‘Talmudical Judaism’ (reform jews also follow the Talmud btw) but you can clearly say that generations ago it would have been similar to Christianity? Curious. By the way reform Judaism does not exist in israel as there is no need to pretend that a Jewish version of lighweight Protestantism exists.

  5. @Tyrion 2

    Unz had an obligation to spend no less than a year attending a synagogue, as an adult in a state of study and learning, before writing this article. I would love to hear that he did, but the first statements suggest that he didn’t. I have not said he shouldn’t have written something like this article – only that given his standing and presuming charity upon his best intentions, that is a reasonable expectation.

    Incidentally – this is an option available to everyone who comments here. Take the class, attend the synagogue. Observe and ask questions. Be a good guest.

    • Replies: @Anon
  6. Pat Casey says:
    @Tyrion 2

    So you’re not going to answer the question about the rest of the Old Testament. I take that to mean you’re not honest enough to admit that you mischaracterized what Ron wrote and why he did. I mean come on, this business about INSINUATION … Did you read the entire article? Does Ron Unz seem to be in an insinuating mode when he mentions the strong likelihood that Jews ritually sacrificed Christian children for their blood? That is pretty damn “alien” to Christianity, wouldn’t you say? Does it strike you as an insinuation when he says Rabbis preach about enslaving Gentiles?

    “… and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan.”

    –Jesus Christ

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  7. @Tyrion 2

    The Torah is the most important part of the Old Testament. According to Judaism it was handed down by God.

    Tell me what language the written Tablet was handed down?

    Was Torah handed down in written form or oral form?

    If written form, then in what language?

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  8. Excellent and brave essay; we’ve been on the same path, in my case roughly since the turn of the century.
    This is so fascinating and multi-faceted that there does exist a risk that we become one-trick JQ ponies.

    I do hope Mr. Unz has the fortitude to endure backlash of Finkelsteinian proportions…..

  9. utu says:

    Why not make it the lowest common denominator playing field so African Americans are not disadvantaged and have Jews wearing Star of David or non Jews wearing some other sign? You can’t leave Blacks behind.

  10. Olorin says:

    • Replies: @Veritatis@Anon
  11. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    In America anti Semitism isn’t caused by individual interactions with individual Jews

    It’s caused by the extremely successful collective Jewish war on Whites. School desegregation, school bussing affirmative action, mass immigration, enabling black crime that destroyed our cities all were funded by AJC ADL and other Jewish non profits and effected by Jewish attorneys.
    The volcano of hatred and bigotry spewed at the White goyim by the MSM academia from kindergarten to university and entertainment industry is a Jewish volcano of hate directed at us.
    That’s why the goyim should be anti Semitic

    • Replies: @AaronB
  12. Olorin says:
    @Daniel Rich


  13. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Yes they were atheist anti religion socialists who rejected even Judaism as a religion.

    And yes they hated Christianity so much they refused to wear ties because the vertical part looked too much like a Christian cross.

  14. utu says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Yale University’s undergrad student body is 27 percent Jewish (1,500 Jewish undergrads out of 5,477 total). Percentage-wise, it narrowly beats out its Ivy League rival Harvard University, which is 25 percent Jewish (1,675 out of 6,694 undergrads). But Cornell University and Columbia University both have more Jews in total — 3,000 and 1,800, respectively.

  15. iffen says:

    I don’t buy the whole “I’m no expert on it” shtick simply because it always comes conveniently next to something incendiary. I think it’s mostly rhetoric to avert criticism.

    And accountability.

  16. @Anon

    “How did Israel cause Indonesia to invade and genocide East Timor ?”

    Diversion, diversion, diversion! Off topic!

    1) Why Levant? I would think it would be Ur in Southern Iraq.

    2) The Ashkenazi are almost identical to one another at 96% “Ashkenazi” (code for Khazar) and 99% European.

    Here are a couple of samples of DNA results:

    David Pakman
    96.9% Ashkenazi
    99% European

    Bernie Sanders
    97.7% Ashkenazi
    99% European

    • Replies: @Anon
  17. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    I have no interest in what was or was not done in Europe 1939 to 1945. That’s why I usually skip Wally and didn’t comment on the articles about the way Germans were treated by the occupation forces after the war.

    My interests are very parochial and self centered. All I care about is what organized Jewry has done to White Americans since 1956 Brown vs Topeka.

    I’m tired of typing. If you want to know what organized Jewry has done to White Americans in the last 62 years read my other posts in this article.

    And get off your knees.

  18. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    One can’t just “attend” a synagogue. One has to apply, be accepted, and at least in the heavily Jewish city where I live, pay from $10,000 for a single to $30,000 for a family membership.

    They have ushers at the door and anyone who is not a member is turned away. Guest passes are available if one knows a paid up member. The members are limited as to guest passes.

    The board members and Rabbis don’t want Jews sneaking in to worship without paying

    Shuls are much much cheaper. But they’re just short morning prayer services, no lessons.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  19. A very interesting article. Not many people have the courage and honesty to question beliefs which are in a certain way important to their identity. Most people who would have good reasons to question their beliefs and identiy are not willing to do that.

    I have read Shahak’s book years ago and had my doubts that what he said in his book was right. I’m not an expert in religion or history and I never cared to investigate the matter more systematically (according to my limited capacities). So it took years until I read or saw more or less by chance other things (for instance a documentary on tv about the history of Judaism) which confirmed what Shahak said about the historical explanation of antisemitism and about the Talmud.

    I think that Jews today are also exposed to some of the same ideas that prevail in our societies. This means that nowadays it’s more difficult to keep the same ideological or practical rigidity that may have existed in other times, but this means that some may answer to that influences creating new forms of hostility (I know different people who chose opposed ways and either became almost ferociously attached to the group and others who decided simply to leave the group behind them). There may be more diversity and dissent, but also new forms of community integration based on hostility. (I continued my original comment at this point speaking more concretely about this theme but decided not to post this as it might make the comment too long). One very interesting book in this respect is the book by Stephen Bloom, Postville. It tells the experience that Bloom made meeting a community of Jews in Postville which isolated themselves and showed how they despised the main society which received them well.

  20. annamaria says:

    “Slave markets in Libya, Somalia, Iraq, Syria.”
    – Thanks to the Christian warriors Cheney, Bush, Blair, Rice, Clinton and the zionist warriors of the Lobby.

    • Replies: @Anon
  21. D. K. says:
    @Tyrion 2

    For those who are unwilling to peruse— or, for other denizens, to revisit— my weeks-long exchange with Ms. Baytch, in the comment thread to the Ron Unz posting that I already have linked to, above, here is just one passage from one of my many replies to Ms. Baytch, back then:


    Although I did not read your exegesis on Mr. Unz’ hypothesis, I did read Dr. Gelman’s update (cited in your original comment, above), at his own Web site, and then perused the comments. The prolific Steve Sailer said it best, I think: There are plenty of people at Harvard University who are quite capable of doing a simple survey to find out just how Jewish Harvard’s student body actually is– by, for instance, asking a random sample of sufficient size how many of their respective four grandparents were ethnically Jewish, irrespective of their religious beliefs (if any). Apparently, no one at Harvard University, nor in the organized Jewish community, finds that question quite as interesting as Steve Sailer and some others of us would.


    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  22. AaronB says:

    That’s a fair point – and yes, you have a right to be aware of who your enemies are, and I for one would support efforts to create a rapprochement between whites and Jews, if possible.

    My point is merely that group warfare is normal and natural – there is nothing unique about Jewish culture or the Talmud that makes it especially anti social. You whites have “extremely successfully” waged war against countless groups for millennia as well as among yourselves.

    So let’s stop the stupidity and accept that group war seems endemic to the human condition and take that as our starting point, agreed? Then we can talk like adults.

    Jewish culture has a strong universalistic streak as well as a streak of animosity to gentiles, and believe it or not contains pro-gentile messages and ultimately believes in the redemption and elevation of all human beings and the reign of peace and bliss. Of course, Jews play a special role on bringing about this scheme – but the simplistic narrative in this article is a caricature, created by selective quotations. But it is more than just a caricature – it also really does reflect the attitudes of some Jews some of the time. Human nature falls frequently.

    Things are far more complex than you would like – I genuinely appreciate Christianity, but the Christian belief that everyone who doesn’t believe in Jesus will suffer eternal torment, no matter how benelovent, kind, and gentle, and Thomas Aquinas’s statement that one of the pleasures of heaven will be to watch those in hell writhe in agony (presumably, many being there simply for not asserting to certain propositions Aquinas believed in), strikes me as utterly horrific.

    But I do not automatically condemn Christianity on this account – but see it as a complex multi-faceted phenomena that cannot be reduced to any one of its statements but must be evaluated as a whole.

    I understand the modern mind likes simple narratives a child could understand – but if one wanted to, one could create a quite bad picture of Christianity based on selective quotes.

    So lets bring the conversation up a level and stop with the childish simplicities, without denying the facts that Jews do see themselves as at war with gentiles all too often, and that gentiles gave practiced group warfare far too often as well – and if we are so minded, after facing reality, try and figure out what to do. If anything.

    Or you can just fight for “your side”, which is really what nearly everyone chooses in the end.

    • Replies: @Anon@iffen@Crates
  23. @AaronB

    Not so fast. Judaism has been around for over 3000 years, which sounds like such a long time that one might assume Jews will always be with us. But there have been others.

    Smallpox has been around even longer, at least 10,000 years according to archaeologists, with a death toll of many millions. So long had smallpox been around that doubtless many people assumed it to be a scourge of God, and nothing could ever be done about it. Then, with remarkably little fanfare, it was announced some 20 years ago that smallpox has been eradicated, with only two samples surviving in Russia and the USA.

    From ineradicable scourge to test tube sample depending on the holder for its survival. All done in under a century. Pretty cool.

    The world is waking up to the Jewish peril, and has ignored it as much as possible due to the consequences. But the Jews never settle for good enough. They keep pushing their advantage until they get a furious reaction. All signs point to that reaction coming up which will determine who will be left standing on this rock, and who will be buried under it.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  24. anonymous[107] • Disclaimer says:

    Same way Germans holocausted 6 million Jews:

    “Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus – mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.”– Raul Hilberg

  25. Anon[694] • Disclaimer says:

    Triggered !!!!

    You said israel is the obstacle to world peace . Explain the Indonesian occupation and genocide of both Timor and Papua.

    Ashkenazi Jews 45% of world Jewry not 95%.
    Khazar dont exist .

    I wont expect much from you . Yemeni IQ is 83. That is close to mental retardation. Multi generation cousin marriage and lack of vitamin D will so that to ya. Yemen is 100% Muslim, yet embroiled in civil war. Is that not a contradiction of Mohamads writings re. Dar al islam ?

    • Replies: @anonymous
  26. Anon[694] • Disclaimer says:

    Slave markets in Mauritania, Sudan , Nigeria as well . Christian and Zionist warriors dont seem to be the cause of Islamic slaving after all .
    Seems Muslims enjoy buying and selling abds( slave in arabic , also colloquial name for blacks) in any situation, wars with the west or not.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  27. utu says:

    You are mixing categories. W/o free speech there would be no hate speech and w/o hate speech you would not know you have a free speech.

    Think about the ethical system that does not contain even implicitly the 1st or the 2nd Kan’t categorical imperatives. W/o them evil is bound to be created.

  28. annamaria says:
    @Tyrion 2

    “…it shows why the article is pernicious…”
    — What you don’t understand in this quote from Baytch “research?”- “Jews are the most underrepresented group at Harvard.” She peddles the “most victimized” and the “most suffering” trite. Enough already.
    By the way, try to make sense of her methodologies for science competitions and for college admission.
    Judging from Baytch forays on the web, this woman is a fanatical zionist, that is, a biased, dishonest person.
    In comparison, Unz’ papers show integrity, intellectual vigor, and tremendous courage.
    You need to re-read

  29. annamaria says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Please, send your complaints and grievances to Ms. Baytch who writes in her “research” that she uses Hillel’s numbers.

  30. Excellent article (as usual). Watching you tread down this path is quite interesting.

    This pattern extends beyond America.

    Even in Sweden, which only has a few thousand Jews (and had none whatsoever prior to the reign of Karl XII), the Danish-Jewish Bonnier family is the largest owner of mass media in the country.

    This isn’t hypothetical. What are now known as the Baltic States were conquered by German crusaders in the Middle Ages. The German conquerors quickly took control of all the cities, estates, churches, and government in the country.

    The Baltic German nobility went on to govern the Baltics for seven centuries, later under Swedish and then Russian overlordship. Baltic Germans furnished many important government officials, businessmen, military leaders, diplomats, and scientists in both the Swedish and Russian Empires.

    The Baltic Germans never exceeded more than a tenth of the total population of the area.

    The Balts had fewer rights than peasants in Western Europe did, but did not seem to suffer ill treatment (at least not after the conquest and forcible Christianization). Several of Reunified Germany’s ambassadors to the newly independent Baltic states were Baltic Germans, suggesting no lasting ill will on the part of Balts for their former German overlords.

    Protestanism result in the spread of literacy among the indigenous Balts, which in turn led to national awakenings.

    One of the results of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was the repatriation of all remaining Baltic Germans to Germany. The few who refused to leave were expelled (or fled in terror) by Soviet authorities in 1944-45.

    • Replies: @Heros
  31. annamaria says:

    Muslims are your cousins; learn how to live in peace with them as you used to live among them for centuries. Leave western civilization alone.

    • Replies: @Anon@Helen4Yemen
  32. Perseus has gone into the cave and cut off the head of the medusa.

  33. Haxo Angmark says: • Website

    @Unz -

    Brenner’s 51 Documents is actually an appendix to his major work, Zionism in the Age of the Dictatorships….which is, I think, the best study to date on this particular subject.

  34. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    The difference is that Englishmen can and do write really or seemingly anti-English books and … nothing happens to them. Nobody tries to curse them or force them to recant. People agree or disagree. The British even publish propaganda books with titles like The Crimes of England. And nobody cares. That’s what it’s like being a normal nationality.

    • Agree: silviosilver
    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  35. Mulegino1 says:

    Evidence, witnesses and paper trails for what, precisely? Nobody disputes that many Jews were interned by the Germans in concentration camps, work camps and ghettos- especially once the war against the Soviet Union was begun. The internment of those who were perceived to be enemy aliens was a common practice among all the major belligerents.

    The issue at hand is rather a simple one- is there any physical or authentic documentary evidence that National Socialist Germany planned and carried out an industrial scale mass murder aimed at wiping out the Jews of Europe, mostly by poison gas in mass gassing chambers using either commercially available pesticide or non-lethal diesel exhaust? Are there mass graves or traces of human remains at any of the specific sites claimed by the official version of the Shoah Business to have been the site of extermination activities namely Auschwitz-Birkenau, Majdanek/Lublin, Treblinka II, Chelmno, Belzec and Sobibor? Is there any authentic document or order clearly corroborating the existence of an extermination program? The answer to all three questions is a resounding, “No!”

    The official and consistent policy of the Reich was that the Jews ought to leave the German sphere of influence- either by orderly and peaceful emigration or resettlement. All of the authentic documents point to this, including the Transfer Agreement, the Schlegelberger Document, and the Luther Memorandum.

    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
  36. annamaria says:

    “The genocidal work of the Einsatzgruppen, the endless lists, the dates marked, the deportation of the Hungarian Jews…”
    – If you care for the historical record and memory than why do you think the 52 (fifty-two) main American Jewish organizations are silent about the revival of neo-nazism in Ukraine? The revival has been promoted and supported by American ziocons.
    How come that the “righteous” Jewish community of the US has not excommunicated Nuland-Kagan, the open collaborator with the neo-Nazi? Where are The Simon Wiesenthal Center and its nazi-hunters?
    Why Carl Gershman, a president of NED, has not been excommunicated by the Jewish community for his policy of supporting the banderites? The NED’s policies in Ukraine are the gravest insult to the memory of the WWII victims (see the Einsatzgruppen).
    Similarly, the main financier of the neo-Nazi battalion Azov, a wealthy Israeli citizen Kolomojsky, has not been stripped of the citizenship and has not been deported from Israel for his immoral activities.
    If you are looking for the “increasing antisemitic and racist tendencies,” look no farther than the policies of the Jewish State: “Israel is arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine”
    “The rifles are produced under licence from Israel Weapon Industries, and as such would have been authorized by the Israeli government.
    IWI markets the Tavor as the “primary weapon” of the Israeli special forces. It has been used in recent massacres of unarmed Palestinians taking part in Great March of Return protests in Gaza.
    Fort, the Ukranian state-owned arms company that produces the rifles under license, has a page about the Tavoron its website. The Israel Weapon Industries logo also appears on its website, including on the “Our Partners” page.”

  37. DB Cooper says:

    Here is a quiz for everybody.

    This is a country created after WWII, is a democracy, has invaded and grabbed land from every single of its neighbors. Is occupying United Nation recognized disputed territories. Has annexed a small neighboring country by the end of the last century. Despite all the gross human rights violation is pretty much a Teflon country. The name of the country starts with the letter ‘I’.

    Which country is it?

    • Replies: @Anon
  38. Moi says:

    and one of rare intellectual honesty. Be safe, Mr. Unz.

  39. Anon[130] • Disclaimer says:

    Muslims are my cousins ? Hmmmm I did not know I had relatives in Aceh or Burkina Faso . Thanks for the info Annie !!!!

    Btw , Muslims cannot get along with anyone , even themselves. A fulfilled prophesy from genesis :

    “a wild ass among men; his hand shall be against every man, and every man’s hand against him. And he shall dwell over against all his brethren” (Genesis 16:12).

  40. Anyway, the world could be a much better place with less prejudice, more tolerance and less violence. It just happened in Germany: an Israeli professor was attacked by a Palestinian young man or boy (as far as I understood only lightly). The professor run after the Palestinian and the police was called because of an “act of antisemitism” (as it has been called). The police came and thought that the Israeli professor was the Palestinian agressor and beat him much more strongly than the Palestinian had hit him. Now the policeman is in big trouble, the Palestinian boy is in even bigger trouble and the Israeli professor was beaten twice, first by a Palestinian and after that by the German police. A few weeks ago a German cartoonist published in one of the most important newspaper a cartoon of Netanyahu. After that he was hardly criticised because he had drawn Netanyahu with too big ears. Then he was fired and lost his job in the newspaper because of his drawing of Netanyahu. Days later I saw Netanyahu in television (possibly calling to bomb Iran, I don’t really remember anymore) and was surprised to see that he really has bigger ears than in the caricature.

  41. @Anon

    You accept black/Asian priests-popes. You’re the problem.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History@Anon
  42. geokat62 says:

    Sam Shama, is that you?

    • LOL: iffen
  43. annamaria says:

    Was there slavery in the prosperous and civilized Libya before the neo- and ziocons joined their efforts at “humanitarian” intervention that fitted so well the famous Oded Yinon plan?
    How about Syria that continues to suffer the assault from the “only [theocratic] democracy” in the Middle East? This theocratic democracy has been also on the best terms with fanatical Islamists of ISIS and A Qaeda. Guess, this is a realpolitik… So “superiorly moral”

    • Replies: @Anon
  44. @Ron Unz

    What is the meaning of “Ethnically Jewish”?

    Can one be “ethnically Muslim”or “Ethnically Christian”?

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  45. Interesting article. However, Mr. Unz is writing from a Jewish perspective and thus is limited in his world outlook. I can tell you about the last one hundred years. It boiled down to the most evil ideas in human history of the past 2000 years – universal brotherhood and universal church.

    We have to look at the world from the present and that almost everything we’ve been taught for the past 2000 years is wrong. At this point in time, now that the entire world has been mapped and settled, there is one objective truth that stands out and sums up world history – IQ. IQ is tied to race. IQ and race determine a civilization. While Mr. Unz provides many interesting insights and facts, these things don’t matter any more. Right now, it is the RCC and the Zioevangizers who are the “Jews” busy destroying the Western world. Jews are not Western and cannot be in the West. Also, today’s Jews are not related to the Jews of Old Testament or even when Jesus lived. They are a mixed, mostly Afro-Asiatic people who have adopted some Western ways. Until we get RCCers and Zioevangizers to see this, we will continue to have problems. Of course, placing IQ and race at the fore is a threat to the RCC (universal church) and the Zioevangizers (they want the temple rebuilt because this cause Jesus to come back). So, as the many insane anti-Semitic commentators here babble on about the Jews, many of them refuse to deal with the IQ/race issues. We need to first repatriate/separate blacks/Asians/Jews/Muslims from the West. They have their own countries. Then we can focus on rebuilding the West. This will require moving the papacy to the Congo or the Philippines. This will require that Western schools teach the West is best because of the Western people. The Talmud, the rabbis are distractions. Focus on the cowardly Caucasian RCC/Zioevangizer male who is standing in the way of saving the West.

    Brother Nathanael recently aired a youtube criticizing Jews for calling themselves the “master race.” They are not. Israeli Jewish IQ is 93. Western Jews were small in number so the little IQ gains they made over 2000 years in the West amount to nothing. However if Jews in Israel want to worship their “Joooooiness,” I don’t care as long as they are not in the West. I worship my Westerness.

  46. Tyrion2, you’d best be arguing with other religious Jews and not with Ron as they all disagaree with you.

    In fact, just google the topic yourself and do your own research instead of cluttering up the comments section with your objections to fact.

    • Agree: Them Guys
    • Replies: @RobinG@Tyrion 2
  47. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    I don’t believe in God, but Christian Western European is my civilization and is like to preserve it and its people which includes me and my family.

    In America, affirmative action school desegregation school bussing affirmative action for FOB immigrants unlimited immigration and the official state school curriculum of hate Whites hate Whites hate Whites are all Jewish causes that became the ferociously enforced laws of the land

    I know who my enemies are.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  48. RobinG says:

    The only thing, Art, there are plenty of non-Jew war profiteers joining in the Trump-bashing. The Deep State has no religion but power and profit.

    And no question the press is Jew dominated, but they’re already in full blown TDS. No need for any directive. They’ve got to keep their fake narratives going.

    But Trump was great. He hit them with the DNC servers, HRC emails, Awan scandal, and liar/traitor Bill Browder. What am I forgetting? He was terrific.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus@Art
  49. @utu

    Are we really having a discussion?

    People only care about what it means to be “white” because for 50+ years we have been forced to self-identify as such, for the purpose of picking and choosing favors on the basis of demography. The cumulative effect of that is a world of mutual resentment and a cottage-industry turned mass-industry for the sustainment and manufacture of grievance to simultaneously force a triple-down on the affiliation with “white” while justifying the immiseration of the most vulnerable of the same kind. It works so well that there’s an article up above using sweeping generality to smear millions of people with Satan worship.

    People care about their ethnic affiliations. It might not be a bad thing to promote that, extra-legally, while at the same time pulling the rug out from underneath the arbitrary legal decision to force “white” on everyone.

    Want to see intersectionalism, postmodernism and the “Frankfurt School” all disappear? Disappear the demand for them. Know how? Ban collection of racial and gender designations for employment or academic purposes. The only reason to make an exception for African Americans is that in sufficient numbers so many would request or demand it, that it’s a necessary concession to take the heat off the problem.

    I kind of think you know all that.

    • Replies: @utu@Thorfinnsson@James Charles
  50. iffen says:

    – there is nothing unique about Jewish culture

    Disagree. Existing after two thousand years in a diaspora. What other group has done this?

    As Judaism comes to be defined by Israel, then it will be nothing unique, just one among many.

    • Replies: @AaronB@bjondo@renfro
  51. Seraphim says:

    Hens are not reputed for their IQ. There are doubts that they have brains at all.

  52. Anonym says:

    Congratulations Mr Unz. Reading your previous articles I think I mentioned that your testicles were of an immense and metallic nature. This articles demonstrates that they are of planetary scale.

    I pray you have the IQ to match the scale of your gonads. It certainly seems that way. Occasionally in life you get to meet such a searing intellect, to know you are in the presence of an intellectual superior. It’s frankly awe inspiring. So… it seems that way. I pray that Jewry, and also the Jewish berserkers as you term them, enjoy your writings so much that they are more interested in what you next have to say than in preventing you from saying it. (I am not religious btw.) The nature of Jewish IQ, the bell curve and the like implies that there are Jewish activists of at least your intelligence and resources. I hope they stay their hand.

    The above was indeed hilarious.

    There are very few non-fictional things in life that I have read with such interest. It is like reading a real-life Emmanuel Goldstein serializing his book “The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism”. Watching the Man X scene in JFK. Seeing the Loose Change 2E documentary. Reading Steve Sailer’s early work on the reality of race, IQ and the like. Reading Yggdrasil’s work.

    I love the way you introduce the forbidden knowledge, an author that you really would like to read if only I could get my hands… and then BAM! There it is in html. If I had the time to read those I would and I bet it would blow my socks off to a similar extent.

    It’s interesting that Shahak died a few months before 9/11, like Col Fletcher Prouty.

    You know, I love truth, I love learning how things work. And I must say the info on a few of the things were not new to me, e.g. JRM, the Talmud being a driving force, what it is basically about, the practices of hiding the truth. A few things were new, for example the emphasis on magic in Judaism. And possibly new, the authoritarian control held by Rabbis. Certainly others.

    One thing I am curious… what was the purpose for the massacre of the Palestinians? What caused it to happen at that particular time?

    And also, I would love to know where you are going with all this… what is your aim? What do you hope to achieve? You do not have to disclose it, but it does make me curious. I intuit you are building to something magnificent and it makes me curious.

    • Replies: @NYCTexan
  53. bj says:

    William Browder is a jew who hates Russia and has done more than any man alive to attempt to use the USA to destroy Vladimir Putin and Russia. He appears enraged that a goyim dares to protect Russia from the predatory jew.

    Vladimir Putin said he has evidence William Browder gave 400 million dollars to Hillary Clinton from money’s taken from Russia in the looting of the 1990′s. The transaction was facilitated by USA intelligence agencies. The information is from the Helsinki Summit news conference with Vladimir Putin and Donald J. Trump.

    William Browder uses his stolen billions to threaten humanity with thermonuclear war to satisfy his blood lust and vengeance. I wonder what 400 million would buy, if Hillary Clinton were president?

    The Killing of William Browder…Alex Krainer

    “To the people of Russia
    and the United States who
    hold the keys to the
    future of humanity”…..Alex Krainer

  54. AaronB says:

    A perfectly healthy instinct. I don’t object. You should fight to preserve your civilization. And you will succeed. And then you will go on trying to expand, overcome, and conquer others, as your people once did with so much gusto and energy, and as every healthy biological organism tries to do.

    And exactly as Jews are doing – whites once happily conquered Asians, and Germans once happily conquered French, and English conquered Indians, and so on endlessly.

    There is nothing unique about Jewish culture in any of this. Every people secretly thinks the rest of the world should be their slaves.

    I am glad we can be adults about this and discuss it in a calm, objective manner.

    Of course, should one wish a way out of this endless biological struggle – there is the spiritual struggle.

    But it is for the few.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  55. Dumbo says:

    No it isn’t, or at least, doesn’t need to be. Maybe that is the Jewish paranoid mentality, and maybe if they didn’t think in this way other peoples would have less trouble with them and they would not be expelled from a different country every 200 years.

    I don’t think anyone would hate the Jews at all if they were not so anti-social (in the sense of being always trying to undermine society) and were not involved in things such as usury, pushing mass migration, pornography, etc etc. Yes, not all Jews, but you know what I mean. There may be many good or even admirable individual Jews, but as a group, they tend to generate hostility. I don’t believe in Kevin’s “evolutionary strategy” theory, so it must be related to their religion and in that case Unz is right. In fact Jews who (sincerely) convert to Christianity tend to be less hostile. And the Orthodox (Haredim) seem to be the ones who most hates Christians.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  56. Anon[184] • Disclaimer says:
    @DB Cooper

    Pakistan – Bangladesh 1971 -3 million + killed
    Cambodian genocide -2 million killed
    Nigerian occupation and genocide of Biafra -2 million+ killed
    India Pakistan partition -1.2 million killed
    Sudanese occupation and genocide of South Sudan 1.5 millon plus killed
    Sudanese occupation and genocide Darfur-800,000 killed
    Alawite occupation of Syria -500,000+ killed
    Indonesian occupation and genocide Papua -500,000+ killed
    Indonesian occupation and genocide Timor-500,000+ killed
    Somali civil war -500,000+ killed
    Russian occupation of Chechnya-150,000+ killed
    Islamic insurgency Philippines-120,000 killed
    Turkish occupation of Kurdistan and Cyprus-70,000 killed
    Kashmir conflict-70,000 killed
    Moroccan occupation of Western Sahara-50,000 killed
    Boko Haram insurgency-50,000 killed
    Israel PaLie$tinian conflict-24,000 killed

    Mr Cooper you are correct , Israel is clearly the worlds big problem post Ww2. Islam is the religion of peace.

    • Replies: @attilathehen@ploni almoni
  57. utu says:

    Move to France. They have already implemented your plan.


Komentari na prvi clanak! - # 300-#360....


  1. AaronB says:

    It is unusual, but it is hardly unique.

    Jews today have a thin genetic connection to the ancient Hebrews – what has survived is the cultural forms, the thought patterns, the metaphysics – survived and evolved.

    The ancient Egyptians had a 5,000 year span, the Roman idea a 2,000 year span, and of course the Chinese a 3,000 or so year span.

    It is unusual only measured against the northern Europeans, who seem to be a young and rootless people without a firm identity – certainly Europeans don’t have deep enough toots to survive a diaspora.

    Europeans really are a series of experiments – they don’t have a core civilization, like other peoples.


    Europeans needed the intellectual and spiritual guidance of a more settled and rooted people to give them some measure of stability – when Europe began casting off the yoke of the South, the Greek, Roman, and Hebrew intellectual and spiritual discipline, she reverted into mere materialism – the creed of the unintellectual barbarian, who values only coarse physical things, what he can see.

    Which is where we are today.

    Some southern or eastern people with deeper roots will have to once again elevate Europe – and I think Europeans
    sense this on some level.

    And then who knows how high Europe can once again rise.

    • Replies: @iffen
  2. Anonymous[953] • Disclaimer says:

    Your friend Mr Derbyshire is one of those who most write about race and IQ.

    IQ is not the most important thing. Race as in ethnicity (our continuity with our ancestors) is more important, and doesn’t require discussions about IQ. We should prefer those similar to us because they are our family, that is all, not because they are smarter or prettier or whatever. Religion is also important. RCC and Zioevangelicals where infiltrated long ago by globalists and masons. Moving the Papacy to the Philipines, and then what? Give the Vatican to the Muslims to become a mosque? No, retake whats yours. Make the Catholic Church great again.

  3. You da man Unz. Keep it up, great reading. Expose them, folks are waking up, even it rural Ga. They can’t hide the truth forever.

  4. @Anon

    Islam is a Christian heresy and a religion of low IQers, i.e., blacks/Asians.

    Islam is the flip side of Judaism.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History@Anon
  5. Wally says:
    @Dan Hayes

    Indeed, Dan.

    Ron has really stepped up and the beauty of it is that he can back it up.

    Others have written some comparable, well researched work, but Ron, being a Jew, a righteous Jew, has surely got The Usual Enemies of Free Speech in a tizzy. They certainly deserve it.


    • Agree: Dan Hayes
  6. @SimplePseudonymicHandle

    France does this.

    Doesn’t work.

  7. Wally says:
    @Hairway To Steven

    “it will now be (properly) understood to be a hate site by the vast majority of people made aware of it.”

    “Properly”? What’s ‘proper’ about censorship?

    Who is this “vast majority”?

    “Truth is hate to those who hate the truth.”

  8. Anonymous[159] • Disclaimer says:

    Can you please try to be less retarded. It’s embarrassing.

    • Replies: @utu@AaronB
  9. AaronB says:

    I agree that it need not be – I am merely observing that this is how life seems to operate.

    I agree Jews would not be hated if they merely laid down their arms and did not participate in the general war of group against group – I am merely pointing out that Jewish participation in this general human war is no different than German or French or English participation. It seems rather strange to ask only Jews to lay down their arms. I am quite sure if the Jew was rendered innocent and harmless – and did not stand in the way of European supremacy – he would not be hated. He would merely be despised.

    Read Mauppassant – he writes very vividly of the sheer hatred of the French peasant to the occupying German army. This is the hatred you are now feeling for the Jew. It is the same hatred the Chinese felt when European armies sacked and looted Beijing.

    This need not be – but so far this has characterized human life.

    Please understand – I am not defending these facts. I am merely stating them.

    I myself favor the practice of spirituality and the underlying unity of all mankind.

    I merely pointing out this ludicrous idea that Jews are uniquely anti social is merely ignorant – or, a mete tactic in group war, conscious or unconscious.

    As for the anti social nature of Jewish culture, it is no worse than other cultures, and is balanced by a Universalist message – which, again, seems to be the norm – self interest balanced by universalism.

    • Replies: @iffen@renfro@Dumbo
  10. Anon[184] • Disclaimer says:

    America has gone to war with many countries, only Islamic States have resorted to their base desires and engaged in slavery.

    The Islamic republic of Mauritania is the slave capital of the world , surpassing Syria or Libya, yet America never went to war there. By the same token America has gone to war with Serbia and the Serbs haven’t engaed in slavery .

    America did not go to war in the Islamic Republic of Sudan yet this is another Islamic state that engages in slavery .

    Saudi Arabia is fabulously wealthy and was also fabulously wealthy prior to 1980 when they claimed to abolish slavery. De facto slavery still exists in fabulously wealthy and militarily unmolested Saudi Arabia in the form of Pakistan and Indian construction slaves,Bangladeshi camel jockey boy slaves and Indonesian slave maids, all of whom must surrender their passports to their employers and submit to all forms of abuse including rape and forced sodomy.

  11. bjondo says:

    Christians and close behind Muslims. Probably Hindus and Buddhists.

    Nothing unique about Yids except the hate inspired in all others.

  12. @Icallbullonit

    As far as I can tell, Ron Unz’s new schtick is:

    1. Despite my claims of erudition, I never knew anything before about any subject connected to my native country, the century in which I was born, or my own ethnic heritage.

    2. I picked up a fringe book on a subject and was immediately convinced by it, so much so that I never bother to read any attempt to refute it, or if I do, I go in with my mind made up that the refutation is wrong.

    3. I cloak my conclusions in scholarly terms but allow all manner of evil filth in the comments.

    4. I also published a guy who thinks Mao is the greatest man who ever lived, so at least I am an equal opportunity creep.

    P.S. “And most falsely do these Christians claim that the Jews have secretly and furtively carried away these children and killed them, and that the Jews offer sacrifice from the heart and blood of these children, since their law in this matter precisely and expressly forbids Jews to sacrifice, eat, or drink the blood, or to eat the flesh of animals having claws. This has been demonstrated many times at our court by Jews converted to the Christian faith: nevertheless very many Jews are often seized and detained unjustly because of this. We decree, therefore, that Christians need not be obeyed against Jews in a case or situation of this type, and we order that Jews seized under such a silly pretext be freed from imprisonment, and that they shall not be arrested henceforth on such a miserable pretext, unless—which we do not believe—they be caught in the commission of the crime.” – Pope Gregory X, 1272. But I guess for the true believers here even thirteenth-century popes are cucks.

    • Agree: Tyrion 2
  13. Wally says:

    “Ron seems to be perilously hovering on the edge of a social abyss – i.e. Holocaust revisionism. Join us Ron it’s the logical endpoint of this particular journey.”

    Why is it a “social abyss”?
    Who decides it is?

    I see it as a beginning point.

    Science, rational thought, & logic simply demolish the ‘holocaust’ storyline.
    And that’s why there are Thought Crime Laws that imprison those who engage in free speech about it.

    Forty-Six Important Unanswered Questions Regarding the ‘Nazi Gas Chambers’
    by Jew, David Cole

  14. Bliss says:

    Mind blowing stuff. Especially since it’s coming from ethnic Jews: Unz, Shahak, Shamir…

  15. @attilathehen

    A religion of low IQers, i.e., blacks/Asians? That’s an accurate description of Christianity from the start, if the Jew Testament is to be believed.

    (1) Ignoble low IQers: The Jewish proselytizer Paul said so himself, “Not many of you were wise by human standards, not many were noble.” (1 Corinthians 1:26)

    (2) Blacks: Africans were recruited early by the Apostle Philip (Acts 8:26-40), and Blacks were very quickly placed in roles of leadership (Acts 13:1).

    (3) Asians. “The churches of Asia send you greetings.” (1 Corinthians 16:19) “Firstfruit of Asia for Christ.” (Romans 16:5)

    • Replies: @General Koofta
  16. @attilathehen

    The Apostle Philip recruited Africans into the Church. Was he mistaken?

    The Apostle Paul’s Asian converts and churches are mentioned several times throughout the Jew Testament. Was he mistaken?

    • Replies: @Anon
  17. Discovering all this has been my own course since 2001. It is a blast to see it so well articulated and on such an excellent medium. Anyone who wants to challenge any of the very judiciously worded assertions it contains would do well to check the sources.

  18. Herb says:

    Israel Shahak was known for creating things out of thin air. He falsified a story about a a rabbi telling someone that they couldnt save a non-Jew on Sabbath, it was later proven to have never happened. He created a lot more stuff about Jewish religion that is fake news.

  19. @RobinG

    The American reporters were an embarrassment.

    How in the world does 70 yr old Trump handle all that travel, enormous pressure, and stay on top of his game.
    Must be the Burger King diet.

    and Putin — the Browder piece was delicious.

  20. Anon[184] • Disclaimer says:
    @Echoes of History

    When Paul mentioned Asia , what specific territories was he referencing ? I doubt the modern boundries of Asia , from Turki/Armenia to Korea/Indonesia.

    When Atilla mentioned Asia , what territories is he referring to ? He is probably excluding Armenia/Georgia/Syria etc.

    • Replies: @Anon
  21. ohmy says:

    Unz, this is a great article and, your 100% correct, no one will believe it. Even though everything you have mentioned is backed up by Jewish scholars it still won’t be believed. As I read I continually thought; How can I get my brother to read this article.
    Recently the Jews are revealing, by their killing and maiming of unarmed Palestinians, how very evil they can be. You touched on the influence Zionist’s had with the Third Reich. It can’t be underestimated. The barbaric atrocious bloodletting of ethnic Russian Christians from 1917 – 1950 was orchestrated by Jews.
    Most people have heard that in America alone thousands of children vanish every year. Could it be them? are they be the culprits we’re looking for? The age old story of Dracula is based on Jews , and for a reason.
    Christians, agnostics and, even atheists are at a disadvantage when dealing with them, as we were brought with basic rules and morals. Not them. All one has need do to realize how vile and evil than can be is to verify the Talmud’s claim that Jesus Christ is boiling for eternity in a vat of excrement. Think about what they claim and, then ask yourself if you know anyone who is capable of dreaming up such a scene. So, we’re dealing with a people who are collectively dangerous.
    On don’t know when it will happen, hopefully sooner than later, but one day enough of us will stand up and say, enough is enough.

  22. Zeidner says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Learn what a Parshah is.

    Ron is somewhat correct that Orthodox Judaism is detached from the Torah.

    Some of his paths of thought may lead to something intetesting, others are dead ends designed to funnel through typical discontents and the like.

    I think someone else mentioned, there is no monolithic Judaism and this means virtually any kook psychopath can claim jewishness. This poses two problems, accusing “Jews” categorically and likewise poses a similar onus on anyone claiming yo act in the name of Jews or Judaism. This of course suggests an issue with the modern nation of Israel. In fact the centralized Rabbinate is easily one of the primary political issues among citizens, second only to the issues surrounding terror and Palestinians.

    Other features to the article such as Nazi Zionist collaborations are well documented.

    What I think Ron lacks here is… how do you explain ethics? Rational Utilitarianism? Christian? Of course he lives this blank and allows those differences to work out in the comments section.

    These problems are age old and the solution lies in understanding how these social features work and to dismantle them.

  23. utu says:
    @James Kabala

    It does not say anything about human blood or baby blood.

    Blood is essential.

    • Replies: @Zeidner@Echoes of History
  24. ohmy says:

    Anon {257} says: “It’s ny opinion that we goyim should be grateful American Jews haven’t yet done to us what they did to Russians 1918 to 1950? And what they’re doing to Palestinians now.
    Be grateful for the 2nd amendment. Our privately held guns are the only thing between you and the Siberian Gulag is my AR.

  25. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    Crazy crazier and craziest.

  26. @Tyrion 2

    There was no Judeo-Christ!

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
  27. utu says:

    This is his Jewish projection. Just blurted out.

    • Replies: @Anon@AaronB
  28. Zeidner says:
    @James Kabala

    A favorite Spencer trick on his blog

    He was paying low end spam artists to post on there at one point. I suspect he even wrote many of the anonymous comments himself.

    Ron is really just stirring the pot. It’s easy tp say ITS JOOS. when really virtually every other religion has these same problems, accusations, contradictions. Did Judaism evolve from talismans, sacrifices, fascist rabbis, etc yes. Now go and reread the history of the church. Had Ron mentioned the same exact issues present in Christianity, Islam and yes Hinduism and Buddhism he wouldn’t get any social media traction.

    Fischer hated his father, who was Jewish. Pretty simple explanation.

    • Replies: @Anon@Anon@D. K.@Sean
  29. utu says:

    You can read with understanding so try again.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  30. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @James Kabala

    That statement by Gregory meant that Jews couldn’t be convicted of murdering Christians for their blood unless there was conclusive evidence.
    I actually read about it both in college years ago and later when I worked at a university

    I concluded that it did happen but it was rare. But it did happen.

    It certainly is totally opposite the Jewish unusually stringent taboos against the contamination of contact with blood. It’s a religion that forbids tattoos because of the blood pricks along with really weird stuff about women and menstruation.

    So that they would preserve blood and eat and drink it is strange. On the other hand Jesus and the apostles were Jews and the apostles accepted his “ eat of my body and drink of my blood” at Passover dinner without any fuss if the gospels are true.

    • Replies: @Zeidner
  31. Zeidner says:

    Grow up.

    I was raised conservative Jewish and I have never net a Jew who thinks consuming human blood is acceptable.

    Normally people like you should be ignored but ill use your point to prove mine. You cant safely say that Jews do anything really. Some keep the Sabbath, others dont. Some eat pigs, others dont. Nobody owns the “jew” term, which btw is distinct from Catholicism, which ironically is wrought with provable pedophilia scandals.

    Unfortunately for you, Jews can’t be put into a simple category you can blame. You need to examine specific practices or ideas and focus on those and yes Jews, or anyone using that term have a responsibility to keep their house clean.

    Cannibalism and consumption of blood is strictly forbidden in the torah.

    • Replies: @utu@Thomm@Heros@Ishmael
  32. Anon[184] • Disclaimer says:

    The slavery meccas of the world are all Islamic States .

    Islamic republic of Mauritania

    Islamic republic of Sudan

    Saudi Arabia

    • Troll: utu
  33. as an Armenian American I periodically read about incidents where Israelis spit on the Armenian priests as they participate in religious processions carrying the Christian cross…. this article clarifies the rationale behind these disrespectful actions.
    Also, the only way to deleverage the power of the Zionist over the prize of the militaristic USA and it’s domination of NATO is to remove the money factor from elections (publically funded) and somehow raise up candidates that are not subject to blackmail over personal indescretions and behaviours. Finally, I am a born again Christian and I repudiate these ignoramus American christian zionists, who misquote (mistranslated aka Scofield) scripture and believe that God will only bless the USA if the USA blesses Israel. A copy of this article should be sent to their think tanks (if they can be called that… I suspect it is case of jewish filthy lucre penetrating their so-called centers of learning and doctrine)

    • Replies: @Anon@Zeidner@RobinG
  34. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    Turkey, Persia Armenia etc were known as Asia Minor in those days. So Anatolians Armenians Persians were Asians technically. Armenia located in western Asia was the very first officially Christian country.

    Syrian monks went as missionaries to and from China as early as the late 200ADs

  35. @Anon

    Federal Government jobs are earmarked for veterans first, a rather recent development. There are plenty of gentile veterans and vanishingly few Jewish veterans of working age.

    A gentile veteran with an online law degree will be hired over a Yale Law-educated Jewish civilian, if that makes you happy.

    • Replies: @Anon@Wally@Anon
  36. @Herb

    anyone who has a PhD in Chemistry is smarter than the average bear, Booboo. I believe him and his research findings way before the trickyu spin doctors Foxman and Dershowitcz and Weisel.

  37. RobinG says:
    @Pat Hannagan

    Well said and referenced, thank you!

    However, Tyrion is a trolling hasbaRat. “Cluttering up the comments section” is his raison d’être.

  38. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    No Christian church ever kidnapped non Christians murdered them and kept their blood and sold it for religious ceremonies.

    • Replies: @Zeidner
  39. Anon[184] • Disclaimer says:

    Keep in mind , Ron is very very very wealthy and this is how he chooses to spend his time . Promoting holocaust denial and reveling in accolades from hate filled commenters . Strange behavior for a happy person enjoying a fortune .

    How about these explanations:
    Ron has a lot of money but he never got a call up to the big leagues like Bezos did . Bezos can take a dump and wipe his ass with a 10 million dollar bill every day for a month and he wouldn’t even have come close to wasteing 1% of his net worth. And Bezos is a goy and Unz is a jew . Sting.

    At some point watching Zuck , Musk , Brin and others much younger than him taking the next step he realized he wasn’t getting a call up to the majors . He plateaued and his wealth and etc wasn’t moving up to the next level so he went in the direction we see here .

    Alternately he may be up in the big leagues and his role is playing the flip side of the George Soros coin. The Dr. Evil of the right.

  40. Biff says:

    Of you want to know who rules over you, find out who you can’t criticize.


  41. @Peripatetic commenter

    P.C.: There was no Judeo-Christ!

    Jew Testament: “We worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.” (John 4:22)

  42. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    Whether your statement is true or not, who’d believe anything you say?

    By the way, what’s your religion?

  43. Anon[184] • Disclaimer says:
    @General Koofta

    Armenian huh ?

    A Jew once spit on an Armenian from second hand anecdotes.

    Muslims killed 2 million Armenians.

    I like where your head is at , Mr. Armenian.

    Talk about a cuck !!!

    • Replies: @Anon
  44. @Echoes of History

    your comment is way off

    The Bible states in Proverbs 1:7 – The fear of the LORD [is] the beginning of knowledge: [but] fools despise wisdom and instruction. and then in I Corinthians 1:25 “Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.”

    Further Paul, who certainly was amongst the most learned men of that epoch states in Phillipians

    3:8 Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,

    what were his learned accomplishments… they are delinated in the earlier verses

    4Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:

    5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;

    6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.

    7 But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ.

    So he lost all of his earthly priveleged stature, but counted the loss as dung.

    Nothing in there about IQ…… friend.

  45. AaronB says:

    So what exactly did Europeans do with all that technology the moment they gained a lead over the rest of the world?

    That’s right.

    Not defending this. Let’s just stop being childish.

    In Judaism, the goyim are not meant to be slaves. All humans are meant to be elevated and spiritualised through the example of the Jews – a light into the nations – and live in harmony and peace. It is a beautiful – if narcissistic – vision, not very different from how Christians saw their role in the world, or Buddhists.

    Of course, just as Christianity got twisted into crusades, religious wars, the destruction and enslavement of the South Americans, and the colonization of the world for the purpose of its elevation, so did many Jews become perverse.

    Judaism is not mere oppression of goyim – despite the Darwinian fantasies of many, no such grim and harsh and loveless vision can sustain a people through exile, and create such high levels of motivation.

    A Jewish friend was telling me yesterday how Gods plan is to elevate all mankind in stages – and when Jews advance to a higher spiritual plane, the goyim will advance to the level of Jews and have to fulfill the Mosaic commandant and have the exact same covenant with God – until, having undergone the same spiritual refinement Jews have, they too will advance to the ultimate level.

    This is a narcissistic vision – but hardly a hateful one. Rather, a very humane one.

    Of course, bein