Exclusive: EU’s food safety watchdog recommended that glyphosate was safe but pages of report were identical to application from pesticide maker

 Glyphosate is the core ingredient in Monsanto’s $4.75bn a year RoundUp weedkiller brand. Photograph: Rene van den Berg/Alamy Stock Photo

The European food safety authority (Efsa) based a recommendation that a chemical linked to cancer was safe for public use on an EU report that copied and pasted analyses from a Monsanto study, the Guardian can reveal.

Glyphosate is the core ingredient in Monsanto’s $4.75bn (£3.5bn) a year RoundUp weedkiller brand and a battle over its relicensing has split EU countries, with a final decision on its authorisation expected in early November.

That decision will largely be informed by an Efsa opinion, which is based on a 4,300-page renewal assessment report (RAR) published in 2015.

In June, Efsa said that where the RAR was concerned, “every scientific study is scrutinised for relevance and reliability by EU risk assessors based on the evidence contained within the study”.

But dozens of pages of the paper are identical to passages in an application submitted by Monsanto on behalf of the Glyphosate Task Force (GTF), an industry body led by the company.

These sections analyse peer-reviewed studies into links between glyphosate and genotoxicity (how likely it is to cause cell mutations), carcinogenicity and reproductive damage.

Franziska Achterberg, Greenpeace EU’s food policy director, said: “Whether this is a question of negligence or intent, it is completely unacceptable.

“It calls into question the entire EU pesticide approval process. If regulators rely on the industry’s evaluation of the science without doing their own assessment, the decision whether pesticides are deemed safe or not is effectively in the industry’s hands.”

Efsa insists that it has a “robust, well-balanced independence policy” and that it views the RAR as separate from the authority’s conclusion which follows it. The RAR is prepared by an EU state’s regulator – in this case Germany’s BfR – rather than Efsa itself.

An Efsa spokesperson said: “It is important to stress that these are extracts from and references to publicly available studies submitted by the applicant as part of their obligation under the pesticide legislation to carry out a literature search. In other words, these are not Glyphosate Task Force studies but rather studies available in the public scientific literature.”

Even so, the Efsa paper repeats descriptions – and analyses – verbatim from the 2012 GTF review. One of these, by former and current Monsanto employees John Acquavella and Donna Farmer, challenges the results of a study which found an association between pesticide use and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

It says: “The major limitations of this study were: the reliance on reported pesticide use (not documented exposure) information, the small number of subjects who reported use of specific pesticides, the possibility of recall bias, the reliance on secondary sources (next-of-kin interviews) for approximately 43% of the pesticide use information, and the difficulty in controlling for potential confounding factors, given the small number of exposed subjects.”

Some other sections are differentiated from the GTF paper by additions of text and reference numbers, different marking of headings and tables, capitalisations, changes from US to British spelling and some text cuts.

Most paragraphs dealing with peer-reviewed papers, though, are copied word for word. A Monsanto spokesperson said that Efsa allowed renewal reports to be written this way because of the large volume of toxicological studies submitted.

“There was an explanation by Efsa that direct passages from the industry application were included,” the spokesperson said. “This should by no means be understood as Efsa’s conclusion on glyphosate.”

The row over glyphosate’s safety has pitted scientists against each other – and regulators – with one branch of the World Health Organisation assessing that the substance was unlikely to be carcinogenic, while another ruled that it probably was.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/15/eu-report-on-weedkiller-safety-copied-text-from-monsanto-study

 

EPA TO EXPOSE ‘SECRET SCIENCE’ USED TO DESTROY ENTIRE INDUSTRIES

Trump’s EPA head is turning the agency around
The Alex Jones Show - MARCH 29, 2018
Steve Milloy joins to comment on how Scott Pruitt will end the EPA’s use of ‘Secret Science’.
https://www.infowars.com/epa-to-expose-secret-science-used-to-destroy-entire-industries/

EVERYTHING IS RIGGED -MIKE ADAMS AUG 02-2016 -NATURALNEWS

EVERYTHING IS RIGGED -MIKE ADAMS AUG 02-2016 -NATURALNEWS

EVERYTHING IS RIGGED -MIKE ADAMS AUG 02-2016 -NATURALNEWS
Are we the people are being cheated, censored, punished, stolen from and lied to? What is, and where is the truth then? How to adjust and exist in such an environment and how to proceed living a life?

Former FDA commissioner Margaret Hamburg named in massive conspiracy and racketeering lawsuit involving Johnson & Johnson, a Wall Street hedge fund, and the Levaquin drug


http://www.eduzdravlje.com/430694425

 

polio vaccine contaminated with cancer-causing virus


98 million Americans were given polio vaccine contaminated with cancer-causing virus, admits CDC

Thursday, July 25, 2013 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: CDCpolio vaccineSV40

http://www.naturalnews.com/041345_CDC_polio_vaccine_SV40.html

(NaturalNews) The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has once again been caught removing pertinent but indicting information about vaccines from its website. This time it involves the infamous polio vaccine, up to 98 million doses of which have been exposed as containing a cancer-causing virus that is now believed to be responsible for causing millions of cancers in America, according to the CDC.

The information was posted on an official CDC fact sheet entitled Cancer, Simian Virus 40 (SV40), and Polio Vaccine, which has since been removed from the CDC's website. Fortunately, RealFarmacy.com was able to archive the damning page before the CDC ultimately removed it, presumably because SV40 has been receiving considerable attention lately due to its connection to causing cancer.

You can view the link to the original CDC page on SV40 and polio vaccines, which is no longer active, here:
http://www.cdc.gov

You can view the full archived CDC page here:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com

As you will notice on the archived CDC page, the SV40 virus was allegedly first discovered in monkeys back in 1960, and not long after began appearing inexplicably in polio vaccines. The SV40 virus, according to this same page, has been linked to causing a variety of human cancers, including childhood leukemia, lung cancer, bone cancer, and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Though the CDC denies a definitive causal link between SV40 and cancer, it implies that the virus, which was supposedly removed from all polio vaccines in 1963, was problematic in relation to cancer development. More than 98 million people, in fact, may have been exposed to SV40 as a result of receiving government-recommended polio vaccines back in the 1960s, and many of these may have developed cancer as a result.

"More than 98 million Americans received one or more doses of polio vaccine from 1955 to 1963 when a proportion of vaccine was contaminated with SV40," explains the CDC. "[I]t has been estimated that 10-30 million Americans could have received an SV40 contaminated dose of vaccine."

SV40 virus in polio vaccines linked to bone cancer, mesothelioma

So why the sudden removal of this important information from the CDC's website? The cached CDC page, as you will notice, makes sure to dissuade its readers from thinking that SV40 has been conclusively linked to causing cancer, even though it was demonstrated back in 1961 by the National Institute of Health (NIH) that SV40 is directly linked to causing tumor formation.

"Like other polyomaviruses, SV40 is a DNA virus that has been found to cause tumors and cancer," explains RealFarmacy.com. "SV40 is believed to suppress the transcriptional properties of the tumor-suppressing genes in humans through the SV40 Large T-antigen and SV40 Small T-antigen. Mutated genes may contribute to uncontrolled cellular proliferation, leading to cancer."

As far as specific conditions linked to SV40, Michele Carbone, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago, found that the virus is present in many cases of both osteosarcoma bone cancer and the increasingly prevalent lung cancer variety known as mesothelioma. As it turns out, Carbone identified SV40 in about one-third of all osteosarcoma cases studied, and in 40 percent of other bone cancers. The same was true for 60 percent of all cases of mesothelioma.

"Many authorities now admit much, possibly most, of the world's cancers came from the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines, and hepatitis B vaccines, produced in monkeys and chimps," adds RealFarmacy.com. "It is said (that) mesothelioma is a result of asbestos exposure, but research reveals that 50 percent of the current mesotheliomas being treated no longer occur due to asbestos but rather the SV40 virus contained in polio vaccination."

Be sure to read the entire RealFarmacy.com report here:
http://www.realfarmacy.com

CDC Admits 98 Million Americans Received Polio Vaccine Contaminated With Cancer Virus

http://www.realfarmacy.com/cdc-admits-98-million-americans-received-polio-vaccine-contaminated-with-cancer-virus/

 

 

 

http://www.realfarmacy.com/cdc-admits-98-million-americans-received-polio-vaccine-contaminated-with-cancer-virus/

 


Sources for this article include:

http://www.realfarmacy.com

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://www.sv40foundation.org

http://www.science.naturalnews.com

 

 

 http://www.realfarmacy.com/cdc-admits-98-million-americans-received-polio-vaccine-contaminated-with-cancer-virus/

JunkScience.com

All the junk that’s fit to debunk.

https://junkscience.com/about/

 

What is “junk science”?

Junk science is faulty scientific data and analysis used to advance special interests and hidden agendas.

Examples of special interests include:

  • The media may use junk science to produce sensational headlines and programming, the purpose of which is to generate increased readership and viewership. More readers and viewers mean more revenues from advertisement. The media may also use junk science to advance personal or organizationsl social and political agendas.
  • Personal injury lawyers, sometimes referred to simply as trial lawyers (as in the American Association of Trial Lawyers or ATLA), may use junk science to extort settlements from deep-pocketed businesses or to bamboozle juries into awarding huge verdicts.
  • Social and political activists may use junk science to achieve social and political change.
  • Government regulators may use junk science to expand regulatory their authority, increase their budgets o advance the political agenda of elected officials.
  • Businesses may use junk science to bad-mouth competitors’ products, make bogus claims about their own products, or to promote political or social change that would increase sales and profits.
  • Politicians may use junk science to curry favor with special interest groups, to be politically correct or to advance their own personal political beliefs.
  • Individual scientists may use junk science to achieve fame and fortune.
  • Individuals who are ill (real or imagined) may use junk science to blame others for causing their illness. Individuals may also use junk science to seek fame and fortune.

CAUTION: Being wrong is not the same as being guilty of junk science.

Wrong science becomes junk science only when its obvious or easily-determined flaws are ignored and it is then used to advance some special interest.

What is JunkScience.com?

Since April 1, 1996, JunkScience.com has led the fight against junk science, including being named:

Who publishes JunkScience.com?

JunkScience.com is published by JunkScience.com, Inc. It is edited by Steve Milloy.

Who is Steve Milloy?

Steve Milloy is a recognized leader in the fight against junk science with more than 25 years of accomplishment and experience. Credited with popularizing the term “junk science,” Milloy is the founder and publisher of JunkScience.com and, from 2000-2009, wrote the popular “Junk Science” column for FOXNews.com. He is an expert on energy, environmental and public health issues, a public affairs consultant, author, TV/radio commentator and public speaker. Milloy was trained in natural sciences, biostatistics, law and securities regulation. He has also been an attorney for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a broker-dealer; and a registered securities principal, investment fund manager, non-profit executive, print/web columnist on science and business issues, and coal company executive. Milloy served on the Trump EPA transition team.

BOOKS & ARTICLES

Mr. Milloy has authored the following books:

Mr. Milloy has authored over 600 articles/columns published in major newspapers/web sites, including the Wall Street JournalInvestor’s Business Daily, FoxNews.com, Financial TimesNational Post (Canada), USA TodayLos Angeles TimesWashington TimesNew York PostNew York Sun and other print and web outlets.

EDUCATION

Milloy holds:

  • B.A. in Natural Sciences, Johns Hopkins University;
  • Master of Health Sciences (Biostatistics), Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health;
  • Juris Doctorate, University of Baltimore; and
  • Master of Laws (Securities regulation) from the Georgetown University Law Center.

ENDORSEMENTS

The following notable individuals and/or organizations have endorsed Mr. Milloy’s work:

Pre-eminent Scientists and Public Health Heroes

  • Philip Abelson, Phd, Editor, Science, 1962-1984, winner of the National Medal of Science, Co-discoverer of Neptunium. “… Milloy is one of a small group who devotes time, energy and intelligence to the defense of truth and science. His current book deserves widespread reading, quotation and responsive action,”‘ from the back cover of Junk Science Judo.
  • Donald H. Henderson, M.D., Dean, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 1977-1990, Director, UN Global Smallpox Eradication Program, National Medal of Science. “(Milloy’s Silencing Science is) a perceptive and eminently readable book… remarkable insights into the manipulation of science for other than laudable ends,” from the back cover of Silencing Science.
  • Frederick Seitz, PhD, First President, National Academy of Sciences. “This valuable book (Junk Science Judo) deals in a thorough manner with one of the serious scientific problems of our times, the intentional distortion of the methods of science in attempts to reach conclusions that are not justified by qualified scientific research…,” from the back cover of Junk Science Judo.

Statesmen & Business Leaders

  • Steve Forbes, President and Chief Executive Officer of Forbes. “Green Hell is the `inconvenient truth’ on extremist, growth-killing environmentalism. A must-read for those interested in keeping America free and prosperous,” from the back cover of Green Hell. About the Free Enterprise Action Fund: “… it’s precept is a sound one,” from “Fact and Comment,” Forbes, April 24, 2006.
  • Jonathan Hoenig, CapitalistPig Asset Management. “Green Hell… is a brash and gutsy repudiation of the environmental dogma now integrated into almost every aspect of modern life… Throughout this bold, tightly written, well-researched book, Milloy illustrates the overriding goal of the Green movement: Not to preserve nature for man, but to protect nature from man. Green Hell astutely unmasks the dangerous ramifications of that philosophy,” from Not Easy — or Smart — Being Green, May 9, 2009.
  • Vaclav Klaus, President of the European Union and President of the Czech Republic. “(Green Hell) describes why the world can’t afford to fall for global warming alarmism and environmental hysteria. Steve Milloy shows how to avoid the environmentalists’ vision of our future,” from the back cover of Green Hell.

Media

  • Barron’s. (Green Hell is a) “convincing book,” from Big Questions, Five Good Answers, February 5, 2011.
  • Fred Barnes, Executive Editor, the Weekly Standard. “Green Hell explains why Americans can’t afford to fall for Al Gore’s `the debate is over’ line on global warming. While we’re all for the environment, Green Hell explains why we need to oppose the environmentalists,” from the back cover of Green Hell.
  • Neil Cavuto, Fox News. “Steve Milloy wrote the definitive book on [modern environmentalism]…”, September 1, 2011. “[Milloy] fill[s] a valuable role [debunking junk science], October 31, 2012.
  • Peter Foster, National Post (Canada) columnist: “‘Thank Gaia for Steve Milloy…,” from “Breaking out of green hell”, June 19, 2009.
  • Daniel Gross, Slate. “Milloy… made a spectacle at the annual meeting of Goldman Sachs,” from “Thank you for investing,” Slate.com (May 4, 2006)
  • Investor’s Business Daily. “… so long as (the corruption of science) continues, it’s a threat to future discoveries of real merit as well as to our freedoms. Daylight helps, as does transparency-encouraging critical websites, such as Steve Milloy’s junkscience.com,” from a A Banner Day for Junk Science, January 6, 2011.
  • Nuclear Street:“Sometimes a guy has to step back, take a long deep breath and reassess everything he thought he knew as fact. Some people conduct this exercise without even thinking, critically examining all that floats their way with the dispassionate eyes of an objective observer. Christopher Columbus did it. Galileo Galilei did it. Charles Darwin did it. Albert Einstein did it. And the world has not been the same since. Now, Steve Milloy does it…,” from NS Book Review of Green Hell, July 2, 2009.
  • Charles Payne, FOX News. ‘Insightful.’ January 30, 2015.
  • Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. “Kudos to JunkScience.com’s Steve Milloy for debunking suspect blame-mankind research behind demonization of humanity’s mercury emissions,” from … Vapors over vapors, April 21, 2011.
  • Popular Science. “… made an impact,” from “The Battle,” July 2012.
  • Rolling Stone. Milloy is a “leading debunker” of global warming alarmism, from the November 17, 2005 issue.
  • John Stossel, correspondent, ABC News and Fox Business News. “I wish Junk Science Judo had been available when I was doing daily consumer reports. It hits the nail on the head about the media’s role in health scares and scams. I wish all consumer and reporters would read it,” from the back cover of Junk Science Judo.
  • Washington Post. Junkscience.com is “popular.” (Feb. 21, 1999, October 12, 1999).
  • RepublicanAmerican (Waterbury CT). “The invaluable Steve Milloy…,” (from “Asthma Illusions Fading,” January 15, 2013).
  • Juliet Eilperin, Washington Post. JunkScience is “well read.” (Twitter, February 18, 2013).
  • Kelly Vance, East Bay Express. Milloy is one of the “slickest” deniers.” (March 10, 2015).
  • Inside Climate News. Milloy is on the ‘Who’s Who List of Climate Denialists.’ March 12, 2015.
  • Catholic Online. Milloy is an “A-list climate change denier.” March 15, 2015.

Miscellaneous

  • Linda S. Birnbaum, Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences & National Toxicology Program. Milloy has “obvious dedication to scientific integrity,” from a personal letter, June 21, 2012.
  • Jane Orient, Executive Director, Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. “[Milloy] has written so eloquently about rational risk assessment, debunked damaging myths,” from “Investing in Sin,” The New Republic (July 3, 2006).
  • Belle Monappa Hegde, renowned physician and former Vice-Chancellor of Manipal University (India). “[Science Without Sense is] A beautiful small booklet by a leading American epidemiologist, Steven Milloy…”, British Medical Journal, October 21, 2004. See also BMJ (February 1, 2001).
  • Marc Morano, ClimateDepot.com. “(Milloy is) the godfather,” from This Man Wants to Convince You Global Warming Is a Hoax, Esquire, March 30, 2010.
  • Dick Morris, Fox News commentator and political consultant: “Regardless of whether you believe global warming is a fraud, the fact is that the current depression, the past spike in oil prices, and the coming technology of electric cars are all going to solve whatever problem exists. Liberals want to use climate change as an excuse to take over the economy and regulate everything and this book exposes their plans,” from the back cover of Green Hell.
  • Penn Gillette of Penn & Teller. “(Silencing Science) is a way funny book written by heroes,” from the back cover of Silencing Science.
  • Rich Trzupek, FrontPageMag.com. “…Milloy is a hero. Using his website, junkscience.com, to deliver his message, Milloy has been a key soldier in the front lines of the battle to maintain the kind of healthy skepticism that is a critical component of scientific endeavor. It’s not overstating the case to say that Milloy, along with Climate Audit’s Steve McIntyre and Joe Bast’s Heartland Institute, laid the groundwork for an increasingly skeptical public to ask the tough, uncomfortable questions that are making global warming zealots squirm…”, from “The Heretics”.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “[JunkScience.com] definitely provides ‘food for thought'”, from US EPA, Web Site Guide to Global Climate Change, July 1999.
  • Wikipedia. “Milloy has popularized the use of the term ‘junk science’ in public debate…” from Wikipedia entry for Steven Milloy.

Opponents

Milloy at first the Wall Street Journal ECO:nomics conference, March 2008, with Kim Strassel (WSJ) and Mindy Lubber (Ceres)

Media Appearances, Speeches, and Other Activities
Mr. Milloy:

  • Has appeared on local, national and international television and radio including: ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings and Good Morning America; CCTV’s The Heat; CNBC’s Kudlow & Co. and SquawkBox; CNN’s Crossfire, Glenn Beck and Talk Back Live; CNNfn; CNN International’s Insight; MSNBC’s News with Brian Williams; FOX Business Channel’s Bulls & Bears, Cavuto, Dagen & Connell, Freedom Watch, Lou Dobbs, Money with Melissa Francis and Varney & Co.; FOX News Channel’s Glenn Beck, Fox Report with Shepard Smith, Fox and Friends, The O’Reilly Factor, Special Report with Brit Hume, Red Eye with Greg Gutfeld, and Your World With Neal Cavuto; Comedy Central’s The Daily Show; National Public Radio’s Talk of the Nation, the Glenn Beck Program, the G. Gordon Liddy Show, the Dennis Miller Show and many other national and local television and radio programs.
  • Has testified on risk assessment and Superfund before the U.S. Congress and has lectured before numerous organizations.
  • Was a featured panelist at the Wall Street Journal‘s first ECO:nomics conference in 2008; and
  • Was a member of the judging panel for the 2004 American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Journalism Awards: Online Category’.
  • Was the luncheon keynote at the 25th anniversary celebration of the National Association of Scholars. Address broadcast on C-SPAN on May 27, 2013.

     

    Steve Milloy delivers the C-SPAN broadcasted luncheon keynote address at the National Association of Scholars 25th anniversary celebration, March 2, 2013.
  • https://junkscience.com/about/
  • JunkScience.com

    All the junk that’s fit to debunk.

 

Massacre Happening NOW: Human Experimentation and 100% Proof Via a ’77 Congressional Report

Massacre Happening NOW: Human Experimentation and 100% Proof Via a ’77 Congressional Report
-
gerard t
4 months ago
My doctor's office in NYC just wanted me to take a vaccine, which I turned down, and then asked if it was "required" for my checkup... The receptionist I was speaking to told me that it is not required, but Highly Recommended; HOWEVER, she went on to say, there will soon be a REQUIRED TRACKING DEVICE THAT EVERY PATIENT WILL HAVE TO TAKE... I told her that I would never take that device, and she answered; (EXACT WORDS)... "Oh, But You Will HAVE TO"! This is 100 Percent True Lisa, and I wasn't even talking bible to the lady... (However I DID tell her about Revelation 13 after she mentioned the tracking device)... The Hour Is VERY LATE DEAR FRIENDS!!
-
Timothy Nicholas
4 months ago
Look what the Army did to it's troops at Ft. McClellan, AL; if you wanna talk about what the gov't does. Look up Ft. McClellan, Toxic Soldiers. I know, because I was one of those affected.
-
BigBrokeBill
4 months ago
During the 50's, the DOD did a lot of nuclear testing (above ground) and troops took part in these tests. The reason was to see what effect there would be to "Operational readiness". Of course, the real effects wouldn't be known until years later.... despite one of their scientists dying of radiation poisoning in a week after exposure to high grade plutonium.
-
Julie Gallegos
4 months ago
If we the people want to be free of the war games/hunger games we must turn back to the Native Americans and learn to live in peace and harmony with mother Earth. We must respect the gifts God gives us. The people who do start a revolution over the rights of the land you must adopt the natural ways of life and the laws of The native American warrior is ready to back up the freedom fighters of America. We tried to warn you of the evil ways of your traditional life of wanting more and more greed is one of the number 1 sins. JFK was right we must smash the CIA and Federal Reserve and shadow government into a thousand pieces. Amen I will pray on this.
-
Thomas Scott
4 months ago
We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers... against SPIRITUAL Wickedness in high places! We are in a Spiritual WAR! Satan wants to destroy mankind... ANY way he can! Really LOOK at EVERYTHING that's going on right now, pure EVIL is behind every bit of it. Poison in the air, in the water, in the food...purposely dumbing down an entire generation... destroying children's lives by FORCING sex education in kindergarten, pushing for peodofilia to be considered just another sexual orientation! Tell me there's not an all-out ATTACK on HUMANITY! Come Quickly, Lord Jesus!!! Please!
-avistock Engineered
4 months ago
Weather warfare is against us or else they wouldn't be making people sick and dead. This government which is a corporation needs to be abolished. There is no more America or Unites States. People waking up is not working. All we can do is now go against the system and form another huge and fierce warrior class. But everyone is working contributing to the corporations that are franchises of the Federal Government. Just like each person with a social security number are corporations. Waking up hasn't been working for a long time and so we have to think of coming together and forming a body of our own. A warrior class may be the answer.
-
Raven R
4 months ago
Morgellons is one of them, no wonder people are sick all the time. I live in Pennsylvania , and drive the turnpike all the time. I knew they were doing this. I'm seeing young people with all kind of problems. Family out of Pittsburgh with Morgellons , and other local places
-PUBLIC LAW 95-79 [P.L. 95-79] TITLE 50, CHAPTER 32, SECTION 1520 "CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM" "The use of human subjects will be allowed for the testing of chemical and biological agents by the U.S. Department of Defense, accounting to Congressional committees with respect to the experiments and studies." "The Secretary of Defense [may] conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological [warfare] agents on civilian populations [within the United States]." SOURCE Public Law 95-79, Title VIII, Sec. 808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 91, page 334, you will find Public Law 95-79. Public Law 97-375, title II, Sec. 203(a)(1), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1882. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 96, page 1882, you will find Public Law 97-375.
Furthermore, a 1994 report issued by Senator John D. Rockefeller exposed the fact "hundreds of thousands of military personnel were subjected to secret biological experiments over the last 60 years." The tests involved mustard gas, nerve gas, ionizing radiation, psychochemicals, hallucinogens and drugs used during the Gulf War.
KSLA also put aerosolized-chemical testing in its historical context, citing a voluminous number of unclassified tests exposed in 1977 Senate hearings. The tests included experimenting with biochemical compounds on the public. KSLA reports that "239 populated areas were contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969."
On screen representations included 'Operation bacterium', '1949 germ bombs' (explosive munitions tests with pathogens), '1950 "first" open-air tests' with biological agents (coast of Norfolk, VA) and the '1950 spraying of San Francisco' (the first large-scale aerosol test using Bacillus globigii (also known as Bacillus subtilis) and Serratia marcescens, both similar to B. anthracis (a causative agent of anthrax). These examples were only the beginning of a long chronological list.
While B. subtilis is not, for example, considered a human pathogen (according to Wikipedia), it has "proven highly amenable to genetic manipulation, and has therefore become widely adopted as a model organism for laboratory studies." Thus, it was utilized as a "biowarfare stimulant" during Project SHAD, a series of chemical and biological warfare tests carried out by the DoD in the 1960s now only partially declassified.
-
Lisa C
4 months ago
I have to say, the way the world has escalated with diseases, allergies, mental disorders, and the list goes on, many will say it has always been like this, just we did not have the technology to inform the public like we do now. BS! I too, have not been around all this crap as a child growing up like I see it now. So many people with some type of issue with their being and their health. This is how destructive MAN is and MAN who desire to control, manipulate and think he is better than the majority of the population/human race. It's all evil to the core and we all know who is responsible for this.
-Sandra Martin
4 months ago
When I was a child in the 1960's there weren't any kids with peanut allergies, there were no kids in my school with autism , I only had a few vaccines compared to what has been going on over the past 40 years... so sad & not right that humanity has stooped to this!!!
-Pamela Rich
4 months ago
I think it's time to act on this...the time for talk and basic research is over! We must submit a petition to President Trump demanding any and all types of chemical testing, all mass depopulation operations and/or military or secret service active programs along these lines must cease and desist. Immediately! That we must be given FULL Disclosure of what had already been done to us so we can seek the correct type of medical care. They should compensate each and every one of us for these inhumane acts!! I'm sitting here sick to my stomach with anger and bewilderment ~ who, how, when...did our government and military become equal to Hitler's gas chambers and Sudam Hussein gassing his own people? We hung him in PUBLIC for his crimes against humanity? Why is this story not being told on International news? Well, they obviously don't want this to get out to the American people but even more so the International Governments and people who may be fully angered at our government and military hypocrisy! They are testing GERM AND BIOLOGICAL AGENTS ON THEIR OWN PEOPLE AND POSSIBLY IN OTHER NATIONS AS WELL. This has got to end NOW! Do we have a volunteer to draft such a petition? Should we organize a committee of people willing to conduct research on their own time, and to set up a system to log everything found so we don't double our work efforts on the same material, etc. I think we must ~ and we really need someone with the expertise and knowledge about all of these issues...hint hint... I don't know Lisa Haven as I'm probably still in the infant stage on YouTube news and platform etc., but she seems like a great candidate to get the ball rolling! What does everyone else here think about it? Yay or Nay? Pros and Cons? Please don't troll. I realize it's hard for you to click next without spitting, I think this topic affects ALL OF US and is no joking matter. Thanks in Advance - Pamela (if I can I will email my contact information to Lisa directly), but please ring in and give your thorough and honest thoughts! God Bless us All.
-
Liberty’s Right OnConstitutionalRights
4 months ago
You are a great reporter and I love you share your resources so we can prove it to those that are in disbelief that this could be happening. Your one of My hero Mrs. Haven, as you aren't afraid to tell the truth. I pray for you and your families safety every night and commend your hard work and determination for bringing the truth out that has been hidden by our corrupt media and government. You are one of God's chosen ones and you have many blessings for delivering the truth as what God wanted for us. You should be very proud of yourself Mrs. Lisa Haven. I am proud of you and your real news you give us. You are my favorite news lady and I am one ☝️ f your biggest fans! God bless you Your family and please Lord keep them all safe. Sending prayers and love your way..🙏❤️🇺🇸💯right always! 😘
-
Joseph Hooper
4 months ago
I assure you, most the cancers, autism, any kind of defect that is all the sudden coming up, in us, our children. is because the government "thought" they could manipulate the human anatomy. and that should tell you, how smart they think they are. But in all reality, they're morals have been exchanged for the "mad scientist" syndrome! and what they are saying, is "life has a price", but you tell them to try it, and they will tell you, Hell no! but it's ok for you and I. And they will have a million different reasons, besides admitting it's lack of f'n MORALS!!!!!

Sickening Truth From a 77’ Report Proves Something Terrifying Is Being Done to Humanity Right Now! 100% Proof!

 

.....................................................................................................................................................................

 

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2017/08/washington-post-report-from-1977-reveals-eerie-truth-youre-not-going-to-believe-100-proof-included-3548523.html

 

Sickening Truth From a 77’ Report Proves Something Terrifying Is Being Done to Humanity Right Now! 100% Proof!

Wednesday, August 30, 2017 7:35
 
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
   
 

(Before It's News)

 By Lisa Haven

 

The Island of Dr. Moreau by H.G. Wells is a classic tale of evil experiments being conducted on the human race. While this is just a horror story, the truth is our government has been and is conducting numerous experiments on the population, and they’ve been doing it for centuries, all while claiming to be the “medical capital” of the world.

Experiments include everything from running testing vaccinations on children without the consent of the parents, to spraying cities with viruses, to running tests of mind control, to dropping viruses on cities via aircraft and more heinous crimes.

In the video below I expose multiple experiments they have conducted on the population since the 1900’s and prove their abominable crimes against humanity. I use documented proof to back my claim as well as an old Washington Post report from 1977.

Here’s the CRUCIAL report….

 

Here’s a list of past experiments the globalists have done to the population since the 1900’s forward (NOTE- this is just a small portion, not all of the  experiments are listed):

1900- A US Army doctor working in the Philippines infected 5 prisoners with the plague and witheld their nutrition to create Beriberi in 29 prisoners. (Read More)

1911- Dr. Hideyo Noguchi of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research injected 146 hospital patients (some of whom were children) with syphilis. (Read More)

1919- Researchers perform testicular transplant experiments on inmates at San Quentin State Prison in California, inserting the testicles of recently executed inmates and goats into the abdomens and scrotums of prisoners. (Read More)

1931- Under the support of the Rockefeller Institute, Dr. Cornelius Rhoads, infected humans with cancer cells. He later went on to establish the US Army Biological Warfare facilities in Maryland and Utah. While there, he conducted radiation experiments on American soldiers and civilian hospital patients. (Read More)

1932- In Tuskegee, Alabama a syphilis study was conducted by the US Public Health Services on 200 black men who had syphilis. They were not told of their illness, nor treated. Instead, they were used as guinea pigs to find out information on the disease. They all died. (Read More)

1935- Millions of people died from Pellagra. The US Public Health Service knew for 20 years that Pellagra was caused by a niacin deficiency but failed to tell the population especially because it happened in there poverty-stricken black populations. Today this is known as The Pellagra Incident. (Read More)

1940- Four hundred prisoners in Chicago were purposefully infected with Malaria because doctors wanted to study the effects of the disease. (Read More)

1942- During WWI, President Wilson created the Chemical Warfare Service (CWS) as a branch of the US Army. Years later the CWS conducted a mustard gas experiment on over 4,000 members of the armed forces. These experiments continued in 1945 where they used Seventh Day Adventists as guinea pigs rather than serving on active duty. (Read More)

1943- Researchers at the University of Cincinnati Hospital keep 16 mentally disabled patients in refrigerated cabinets for 120 hours to study the effects of their disorder. (Read More)

1945- Project Paperclip was initiated. The US recruits Nazi scientists in exchange for immunity to aid them in this project. (Read More)

1945 / 1946- The US Atomic Energy Commission implements ‘Program F’, which studies the effects of fluoride—the main component in the atomic bomb production. The study uncovers that fluoride has a major adverse effect on the central nervous system. (Read More) Today they put it in our water.

1946- Veterans are used in hospitals as human guinea pigs for medical experiments cleverly worded as “investigations” and “observations.” (Read More)

1947- Colonel Kirkpatrick of the US Atomic Energy Commission issued a document stating that radioactive substances would be given to human subjects. (Read More)

1947- CIA uses human subjects to study the effects of LSD, subjects used without their knowledge, this goes on for many years via the MK Ultra program. (Read More)

1947- 1953 – The US Navy begins Project Chatter a program dubbed the “truth serum” project. So of the drugs used to develop this program were used on human subjects. (Read More)

1948- The US government paid the government in Guatemala to allow American doctors to purposely and secretly infect Guatemalan population with sexually transmitted diseases, some of them deadly, in order to study the effects. (Read More) The US apologized for these years later.

1950- In the University of Pennsylvania, Dr. Joseph Stokes infects 200 women with viral hepatitis to study the disease. (Read More)

1950-1953- CIA begins Project Bluebird (aka Artichoke) using drugs, hypnosis, special interrogation techniques, a program geared at controlling the mind. Multiple human subjects are used to experiment on. (Read More)

1950 – 1953-  The U.S. Army releases chemical clouds over six American and Canadian cities. Many residents become ill with pneumonia-like symptoms. (Read More)

1950- Department of Defense begins plans to detonate nuclear weapons in desert areas and monitor downwind residents for medical problems and mortality rates. Thousands were impacted by the radiation. (Read More)

1951-1969- The Department of Defense ignites open air tests using disease-producing bacteria and viruses. People in the surrounding areas were exposed. (Read More)

1953- A CIA joint experiment, known as Operation Sea Spray, was conducted in which 800,000 people in New York City and San Francisco were exposed to airborne germs Serratia marcescens and Bacillus glogigii. All out dumping it on the two cities to study the effects. (Read More)

1953-1957- Via the Manhattan Project eleven patients at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston are injected with uranium. (Read More)

1954- Known as Operation Whitecoat, the United States conducts a biowarfare program, including human experimentation done at Fort Detrick. After tens of thousands of civilians and military personnel served as participants in experiments involving deadly biological agents, it was finally ended in 1973. (Read More)

1955 – The CIA wanted to conduct a test on the ability to infect the human population with biological agents, so they released a bacteria over Tampa Bay, Florida. (Read More)

1955/1956- US military unleashes an entomological warfare field test over Georgia and Florida. They disperse over 300,000 mosquitoes from aircraft infected with Yellow Fever to study the effects of the victims. This is known as Operation Big Buzz. (Read More)

1957- The US military conducts an experiment testing 29 nuclear detonations 69 miles outside of Las Vegas, Nevada. Over 18,000 military men participated and over 32,000 cases of thyroid cancer surfaced among the civilian population after this test. This was known as Operation Pumbbob.  (Read More)

1958- The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) drops radioactive materials over Point Hope, Alaska. Many long term effects on the population. This is known as Project Chariot. (Read More)

1964-1968- The U.S. Army pays the University of Pennsylvania Professors Albert Kligman and Herbert W. Copelan to experiment on 320 inmates of Holmesburg Prison to determine the effectiveness of mind-altering drugs. (Read More)

1964-1967- The Dow Chemical Company pays Kligman to learn how dioxin (a carcinogenic in Agent Orange) affects the human skin. (Read More)

1965- The Department of Defense, via a test called “Big Tom”, sprays Hawaii with Bacillus globigii which weakens peoples immune system. (Read More)

1966- US Army drops bulbs filled with Bacillus subtitles through ventilation gates in the New York City subway system exposing one million to the bacteria. (Read More)

1967/1968- CIA poisons the drinking water with chemicals in Washington, DC. (Read More)

1970- HR 15090, under the supervision of the CIA and at Fort Derrick, speculations are raised that molecular biology techniques are used to produce AIDS like retroviruses. (Read More)

1975- cancer causing virus is developed at the virus section of Fort Detrick’s Center for Biological Warfare Research (renamed Fredrick Cancer Research Facilities). It is also believed that this facility harbors virus with no immunity. Funny how we’ve since a major spike in cancer since then. (Read More)

1978- CDC begins conducting experiments on people in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco with Hepatitis B vaccine. They used gay men as guinea pigs. By 1983 30% of the test subjects became HIV positive. (Read More)

1987- Department of Defense admits that it continues to operate in 127 research facilities across the nation.  (Read More)

1990- Over 1,500 babies of black and Hispanic descent in California were given the measles vaccine. Parents were not informed that their kids were test subjects to this vaccine experiment. Many of the babies died. (Read More)

1994- John D. Rockefeller claims that for the last 50 years the Department of Defense has conducted thousands of experiments on military personnel. Including nerve gas, mustard gas, ionizing radiation, psycho-chemicals, hallucinogens, and drugs. (Read More)

1996- Department of Defense admits that Gulf War soldiers were exposed to chemical agents. (Read More)

2000- The U.S. Air Force and rocket maker Lockheed Martin sponsor a Loma Linda University study that pays 100 Californians to consume a dose of perchlorate — a toxic component of rocket fuel that causes cancer, damages the thyroid gland and hinders normal development in children and fetuses — every day for six months. (Read More)

 

For More Information See:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vk8eNVluvr0&feature=youtu.be

https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015005321081 

http://www.dtra.mil/Portals/61/Documents/NTPR/1-Fact_Sheets/19_PLUMBBOB.pdf

http://usarmywhitecoat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/1954-73-Op-Whitecoat-ID-Res-No-Video-press.pdf

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/1950-us-released-bioweapon-san-francisco-180955819/?no-ist 

http://nsarchive2.gwu.edu//NSAEBB/NSAEBB54/st02.pdf

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1977/03/09/army-conducted-239-secret-open-air-germ-warfare-tests/b17e5ee7-3006-4152-acf3-0ad163e17a22/?utm_term=.98d7a1863682

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2017/08/washington-post-report-from-1977-reveals-eerie-truth-youre-not-going-to-believe-100-proof-included-3548523.html

 

VACCINE TOXINS: MMR, GLYPHOSATE

https://www.infowars.com/weeding-out-vaccine-toxins-mmr-glyphosate-and-the-health-of-a-generation/

 

WEEDING OUT VACCINE TOXINS: MMR, GLYPHOSATE, AND THE HEALTH OF A GENERATION

We’ve been misled for far too long by the claim that vaccines are “safe and effective”

Glyphosate, often sold under the brand name “Roundup,” is the most widely used weed killer in the U.S.

Glyphosate is a “non-selective herbicide,” which means it kills many plants, not just weeds. It kills them by interfering with the production of critical proteins necessary for growth.

In commercial agriculture, Roundup is used on “Roundup Ready” crops—crops that have been genetically modified to resist the powerful toxic effects of glyphosate. The list of Roundup Ready crops includes soy, corn, canola and sugar beets. It is important to remember that, while these plants have been modified to resist the harmful effects of glyphosate, the people and animals that eat them have not.

It is important to remember that, while these plants have been modified to resist the harmful effects of glyphosate, the people and animals that eat them have not.

In a series of articles, my colleague Anthony Samsel and I have been exploring the connection between glyphosate and a number of diseases, including multiple sclerosis, autism, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer. In our most recent article, “Glyphosate Pathways to Modern Diseases VI: Prions, Amyloidoses and Autoimmune Neurological Diseases,” we present evidence that glyphosate has made its way into several widely used vaccines. We describe how the glyphosate residue contained in vaccines might induce the kind of autoimmune responses typically observed in autism.

Interestingly, of all the vaccines we tested, MMR stood out as consistently having the highest level of glyphosate contamination. This fact may help explain why the MMR vaccine, which contains neither mercury nor aluminum, has been implicated so often in vaccine injury and autism.

How Might Glyphosate Make Its Way into Vaccines?

Vaccines can become contaminated in many ways. One potential source of contamination is the animal tissue (chicken embryo, fetal bovine serum, monkey kidney, etc.) that is used as a culture medium to grow the viruses contained in vaccines. The measles virus for the MMR is grown on gelatin made from the bones and ligaments of commercially raised cows and pigs, animals that have been fed a steady diet of Roundup Ready corn and soy feed. Gelatin is also used as a stabilizer in vaccines, creating another possible route of contamination.

As Roundup producer Monsanto itself has reported, the residue from glyphosate tends to accumulate in the bones, marrow, and collagen-rich ligaments of animals. Anthony Samsel confirmed this finding in his own study of the bones, marrow, and other parts of pigs and cows, as well as the derived bovine gelatin.

To provide additional evidence that gelatin is the source of glyphosate contamination in vaccines, Samsel looked at a number of gelatin-based products, including Jell-O, gummi vitamins, and protein powders. He also looked at digestive enzymes such as trypsin and lipase. He found significant glyphosate residue in all of them. It should come as no surprise, then, that all of the vaccines that list gelatin and bovine serum as ingredients tested positive for glyphosate, while those that contained neither of these ingredients tested negative.

Glyphosate may be contributing to another source of vaccine contamination. In a recent study published in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, researchers were shocked to discover a variety of toxic metals in a number of common vaccines. Platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, and chromium all showed up in the MMR vaccine. The source of these contaminants is considered to be a mystery. It is interesting to note in this context that glyphosate was first patented as a pipe cleaner due to its remarkable ability to chelate metals. It may be the case that glyphosate is playing a role in extracting metals from containers during the manufacture of vaccines.

My research leads me to believe that synergistic toxicity between glyphosate and vaccines, particularly MMR, is a major factor in the growing autism epidemic. The severity of MMR-related adverse events, as reflected in the FDA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, has increased steadily in recent years—along with the use of glyphosate on corn and soy crops in the U.S. Some of the reactions that have become significantly more common after 2002 compared to before 2002 are seizures, anaphylactic shock, asthma, autism, eczema, irregular heart rate, and ear infection. Of course, correlation does not prove causation; it is important to understand how glyphosate residues might disrupt the body’s immune system.

How Might the Glyphosate in Vaccines Cause Autism?

In our recent article, Samsel and I describe how the measles virus in the MMR, which is grown on nutrients contaminated with glyphosate, could incorporate this glyphosate into its own proteins, as a coding error, in place of the amino acid glycine. Glyphosate is a glycine molecule with an additional methyl phosphonyl group attached to the nitrogen atom, and we have argued that a key mechanism of its insidious cumulative toxicity is its ability to substitute for glycine by mistake during protein synthesis.

Haemagglutinin is the main antigen produced by the measles virus that is responsible for inducing an antibody response to the vaccine. A glyphosate-contaminated haemagglutinin molecule from a measles virus will be much more allergenic than one that is free of glyphosate. When the measles virus from the vaccine gains access to the brain, the brain’s immune system acquires antibodies to this abnormal haemagglutinin molecule, and then, through molecular mimicry, these antibodies become autoantibodies to myelin basic protein, a basic component of the myelin sheath. This autoimmune attack on the nerve fibers in the brain disrupts neuronal communication channels, causing the symptoms of autism.

Vijendra K. Singh and his colleagues at Utah State University have published multiple papers, dating back to the 1990s, proposing that an autoimmune attack on the myelin sheath due to a viral infection may be a causative factor in autism. In their 2002 paper, “Abnormal Measles-Mumps-Rubella Antibodies and CNS Autoimmunity in Children with Autism,” they concluded that “an inappropriate antibody response to MMR, specifically the measles component thereof, might be related to pathogenesis of autism.” A paperpublished by Dr. William Shaw in 2017 discussed a set of triplets—two boys with autism and a girl with a seizure disorder—all of whom had high levels of glyphosate in their urine and a disrupted gut microbiome, which he proposed was a causative factor.

Gut Dysbiosis: a Primary Factor

Not all children will respond to a glyphosate-contaminated vaccine in the same way. A key factor that increases susceptibility of the brain to damage is an unhealthy gut microbiome, which leads to a leaky gut barrier and subsequently a leaky brain barrier, via a tight communication channel between the gut microbes and the brain. Prior chronic exposure to high levels of dietary glyphosate can set a child up for a severe adverse reaction to a vaccine. Dr. Andrew Wakefield, together with many colleagues, published a seminal article in the Lancet in 1998 on a case study of twelve children, all of whom had a gut disorder and all of whom suffered onset of gastrointestinal and neurological symptoms following MMR vaccine, with regression into an autism-like syndrome.” Parents of eight of the children cited MMR as the trigger for their child’s decline. Wakefield was among the first scientists to recognize the important role of a disrupted gut microbiome in the etiology of autism. Unfortunately, the Lancet paper was later retracted and other researchers were very slow to follow up on this important lead, although finally today an unhealthy gut is recognized as a key feature linked to autism.

Dr. Wakefield recognized that the children in his study suffered from a leaky gut barrier, as a consequence of damage to the lining of the small intestine. This lining is covered with millions of small projections called villi, creating a huge surface area for the absorption of nutrients. The cells that form these villi, called enterocytes, begin life as an undifferentiated stem cell in the “crypt” area of the intestines. From there, they proliferate and mature as they migrate up the walls of the crypt, and then settle in on the surface of the villi, where they absorb nutrients before dying and getting replaced by new arrivals in a constant renewal process, as illustrated in Figure 1.

Glyphosate, as an amino acid, is actively imported into cells along L-type amino acid transporters. Cells that proliferate, like enterocytes, express high levels of these transporters, and therefore preferentially take up glyphosate. In Celiac disease (gluten intolerance), the enterocytes are destroyed more quickly due to exposure to glyphosate and other toxic chemicals. This damage causes the cells to proliferate more quickly, in order to replace destroyed cells. Increased proliferation causes an increase in the uptake of glyphosate, creating a downward spiral.

Thus, glyphosate residue in food sets a child up to fail following an MMR vaccine. Wheat, barley, oats, chick peas, lentils, and sugar cane are not glyphosate resistant, but glyphosate is frequently used as a desiccant or ripening agent for them right before harvest, and it is actively taken up by the seed. Some of the highest levels of glyphosate have been found as a contaminant in these non-GMO foods, so eating “non-GMO” is not adequate for glyphosate avoidance. Glyphosate is not allowed in organic agriculture, so buying USDA certified organic foods is the best option. Children with autism often suffer from gluten intolerance, and I believe glyphosate is a major causative factor in both conditions.

Figure 1: Schematic of the enterocytes in the villi lining the walls of the small intestine, which migrate upward from the crypt to the villus as they mature into functioning enterocytes from initial stem cells. These cells are especially vulnerable to glyphosate toxicity, leading to a leaky gut syndrome.

A Lost Generation

We have been misled for far too long by the claim that vaccines are “safe and effective.” It is not at all clear that inducing specific antibodies to a small set of infective agents, such as the measles virus, while weakening the immune system’s ability to fight off all the other infective agents in the environment, is the best way to deal with infectious disease. As we have seen, antibodies can become autoantibodies and attack the body’s own tissues, leading to chronic diseases that are often worse than the infectious diseases they protect from. Vaccinated children suffer from many debilitating neurological and autoimmune diseases in far greater numbers than unvaccinated children. The manufacture of vaccines is a tricky process, and along with the acknowledged toxic ingredients like mercury, aluminum, and formaldehyde, they also have been found to contain contaminants like glyphosate and toxic metals that may well be the biggest contributors to severe adverse reactions.

As we have seen, antibodies can become autoantibodies and attack the body’s own tissues, leading to chronic diseases that are often worse than the infectious diseases they protect from.

Children today may already be a lost generation, but several policy changes need to take place in the immediate future to save subsequent generations from a similar fate. We need to repeal the 1986 legislation that protects pharmaceutical companies from liability when a child’s life is ruined by a vaccine. This will surely pressure them to try harder to keep impurities out of vaccines. We need to eliminate laws such as California’s SB277 that prevents unvaccinated children from enrolling in public or private schools, and be vigilant to ensure other states don’t follow suit. Then parents will be empowered to make decisions about the best path towards building a strong immune system in their child. Part of that program needs to be a switch to a 100 percent USDA certified organic diet, in order to protect children from the dangers posed by toxic herbicides, insecticides and fungicides. Finally, we need to insist that our elected representatives pass laws that protect consumers from products like glyphosate, which are designed to disrupt processes that support life.

Top 5 Reasons to Avoid Glyphosate Exposure

1. Glyphosate is a “Probable” Carcinogen
In March of 2015, scientists at the UN’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) declared glyphosate a probable human carcinogen. The IARC report linked glyphosate to non-Hodgkin lymphoma in humans and to cancer in laboratory animals, and indicated it can cause “DNA and chromosomal damage in human cells.”

2. Glyphosate is a Patented Antimicrobial Agent
Glyphosate disrupts the gut microbiome leading to the overgrowth of pathogens and inflammatory bowel disease.

3. Glyphosate Negatively Impacts the Brain
According to the National Pesticide Information Center at Oregon State University (NPIC), glyphosate exposure has been linked to developmental effects when administered to pregnant rats in high doses.

4. Glyphosate May Disrupt the Reproductive System

The Western world faces an epidemic in declining sperm quality.  The NPIC links high dose exposure in rats to negative reproductive effects.

5. Glyphosate May Be a Critical Factor the Autism Epidemic

Much evidence supports this, including disruption of the gut microbiome, chelation of important minerals like manganese and zinc, and extremely high correlations between time trends in autism and in the use of glyphosate on core crops.

This article originally appeared at the World Mercury Project.

https://www.infowars.com/weeding-out-vaccine-toxins-mmr-glyphosate-and-the-health-of-a-generation/

 

 

 

https://www.infowars.com/who-cancer-agency-under-fire-for-withholding-carcinogenic-glyphosate-documents/

 

WHO CANCER AGENCY UNDER FIRE FOR WITHHOLDING ‘CARCINOGENIC GLYPHOSATE’ DOCUMENTS

IARC urged its scientists not to publish research documents on its 2015 weedkiller glyphosate review

 
0
0
 
 

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), facing criticism over its classification of carcinogens, has reportedly been advising its scientific experts not to publish internal research data on its 2015 report on “probably carcinogenic” glyphosate.

The IARC urged its scientists not to publish research documents on its 2015 weedkiller glyphosate review, according to Reuters. The agency told Reuters on Tuesday that it tried to protect the study from “external interference,” as well as protect its intellectual rights, since it was “the sole owner of such materials.”

The scientists had been asked earlier to release all the documentation on the 2015 report under US freedom of information laws.

 

The groundbreaking review, published in March 2015 by the IARC – a semi-autonomous agency of the World Health Organization (WHO) – labeled the glyphosate herbicide as “probably carcinogenic to humans.” Glyphosate is a key ingredient of Monsanto’s flagship weedkiller well-known under the trade name ‘Roundup.’ It is one of the most heavily used herbicides in the world and is designed to go along with genetically-modified “Roundup Ready” crops, also produced by Monsanto.

The IARC’s report caused problems for both the notorious agrochemical giant and the agency itself.

The report sparked a heated debate around the use of Roundup, and caused several EU countries – including France, Sweden, and the Netherlands – to object to the renewal of the glyphosate’s EU license. The vote on prolonging the glyphosate license for 15 years failed several times in June 2016, but the license was temporarily extended for 18 months during last hours before its expiration.

The controversial report has seemingly made the IARC a target for attacks from multiple directions, and raised scientific, legal, and financial questions.

Various critics, including those in the chemical industry, said the IARC’s evaluations are fuel for “unnecessary health scares,” since the IARC allegedly studies the potentially harmful substance itself, and not a “typical human” exposure to it. It remained unclear whether the critics urged a WHO body to test the potentially carcinogenic chemical on humans.

The critics also brought up other controversial statements from the IARC, over whether such things as mobile phones, coffee, red meat, and processed meat could cause cancer.

The agency defended its methods as scientifically sound and “widely respected for their scientific rigor, standardized and transparent process and…freedom from conflicts of interest.” Numerous freedom of information requests by the Energy & Environment Legal Institute (E&E Legal), a US conservative advocacy group, have since been turned down with this reasoning.

E&E Legal told Reuters that it is pushing a legal challenge over whether the documents in question belong to the IARC or to the US federal and state institutions where some of the experts work. Basically, it’s being decided whether the IARC, as part of the WHO, is truly independent and free from “conflicts of interest.”

According to Reuters, officials from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) will be questioned by a congressional committee about why American taxpayers fund the cancer agency, which faces much criticism over its allegedly faulty classification of carcinogens.

“IARC’s standards and determinations for classifying substances as carcinogenic, and therefore cancer-causing, appear inconsistent with other scientific research, and have generated much controversy and alarm,” a letter from US Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz to NIH director Francis Collins states, as quoted by Reuters.

The Oversight Committee demanded a full disclosure of NIH funding of the IARC, and even money spent in relation to the cancer agency’s activities.

IARC opponents from scientific circles vowed to provide their data on the matter. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which believes glyphosate is “unlikely pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans,” promised to release its raw data on the subject as part of its “commitment to open risk assessment.” The food safety watchdog made this statement in late September, and still has to deliver the promised information.

https://www.infowars.com/who-cancer-agency-under-fire-for-withholding-carcinogenic-glyphosate-documents/