WATCH PRESIDENT TRUMP EXPLAINS WHY HE DOESN’T GET THE FLU SHOT

WATCH PRESIDENT TRUMP EXPLAINS WHY HE DOESN’T GET THE FLU SHOT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SX9FyjTATsU&index=88&list=PLZX49q1VM8O0wTVaYupBh1Rq17yto_52t

The Event Is Coming Soon - WATCH PRESIDENT TRUMP EXPLAINS WHY HE DOESN’T GET THE FLU SHOT


They are calling this the worst flu season in 13 plus years and hospitals around the country are reportedly overloaded. At the same time, this year’s flu vaccine is said to be only 10-30% effective, depending on who you ask, and, right about half of American adults get flu shots, and around 60% of children take the annual jab.

There is international hysteria about the flu at the moment, and major news sources are reporting that more strains are the way, as the death toll rises.

If there’s one thing media is good at, it’s creating hysteria.

Investigative journalist Jon Rappoport asks some important questions about this year’s flu season. Firstly, how do we know that people with the set of symptoms we’re calling flu, really have an influenza virus in their body? Next, is the media hype surrounding the flu more of a PR campaign than a legitimate public health warning?

“…when health officials begin waving red flags and raising alarms about a current viral flu outbreak, it would be more than reasonable to demand they answer questions about their past lies and deceptions.” ~Jon Rappoport
-
jujubee 63
2 weeks ago
I don’t understand why people get this vaccine.. it is beyond my comprehension why people would voluntarily allow this sh*t into their bodies.. ? It’s like asking the government to voluntarily make you sick so you can voluntarily pay out the katookas in medical expenses. It makes zero sense to me. It’s like we are mesachistic about being ill.. bring it on !
-
jujubee 63
2 weeks ago
Any vaccine is Never good for you ! It alters your DNA and this is never good. It puts sickness in your body that stays dormant.
- daver5150
2 weeks ago
Vitamin D and Zinc ... all you require
- Flu vaccine BOMBSHELL: 630% more “aerosolized flu virus particles” emitted by people who received flu shots… flu vaccines actually SPREAD the flu.
- Scandalous CDC director RESIGNS after caught buying shares of vaccine maker Merck while heading the CDC

The CDC is in bed with junk food companies, vaccine manufacturers and Big Tobacco
-

Most Medical Professionals Giving Vaccines Do Not Know What Ingredients They Contain

http://themillenniumreport.com/2017/10/most-medical-professionals-giving-vaccines-do-not-know-what-ingredients-they-contain/

http://themillenniumreport.com/?s=vaccines

http://vaccines.news/

 

 

 

Most Medical Professionals Giving Vaccines Do Not Know What Ingredients They Contain

Those Who Give Vaccines Should Know The Ingredients in Vaccines

by Marco Cáceres
The Vaccine Reaction

The chances are that if you ask most chefs about the ingredients they put into their favorite recipes, they will be able to list for you the name of every single ingredient and the corresponding amounts. That is what you would expect.

By the same token, you would expect most doctors, nurses, pharmacists and other medical workers who administer vaccines would be able to list for you every ingredient in vaccines, along with the corresponding amounts. That is what you should expect.

However, that is not necessarily the case.

According to neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD:

Nephrologist Suzanne Humphries, MD concurs with Dr. Blaylock. She admits, “[D]octors are not taught about vaccines in medical school. We are not taught what’s in vaccines as far as the adjuvants. We are not taught how vaccines are manufactured as far as what kind of animals go into them.” [2]

Pediatrician Bob Sears, MD also admits, “We never learn what goes into making vaccines or how their safety is studied. We trust and take it for granted that the proper researchers are doing their job. So, when patients want a little more information about shots, all we can really say as doctors is that the diseases are bad and the shots are good.” [3]

Pediatrician Larry Palevsky, MD recalls:

You would think that doctors would, at least, be curious about exactly what they are injecting into their patients. Most of the ingredients in vaccines are listed in the manufacturer’s package inserts as required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), so it should not be difficult to look them up and memorize them. Certainly, it would be no more than it would be for a chef to memorize his or her recipes.

Take, for example, the influenza vaccine. For the 2015-2016 influenza season, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that 42 million children (six months through 17 years old) and 102.4 million adults (over 18 years old) in the United States received one or more seasonal flu shots. That’s a total of at least 144.4 million flu shots given in the U.S. This estimate did not include second doses given to children (the CDC recommendation is that the first year that children aged six months to eight years old receive influenza vaccine, they should get two doses of the vaccine given at least four weeks apart). [5]

The total population of the U.S. last year was 324.1 million last year, [6] which means that at least 44.5 percent of the U.S. population received one or more flu shots.

That’s a lot of flu shots for doctors, nurses, and other medical workers to administer. It is concerning to think that many of these individuals may not know what is contained in the vaccines they are giving to nearly half of the people in the U.S.

There is no good reason for such ignorance because the information is readily available, either in the vaccine package inserts supplied by the vaccine manufacturers with vials of vaccine provided to public health clinics, private doctor’s offices, pharmacies and other vaccine provider [7] or on the vaccine list published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and posted online. [8]

It is reasonable to assume that those who administer influenza vaccines regularly to people should know the ingredients of what they are giving. It’s not all that different from memorizing the ingredients of a few favorite food recipes.

The CDC lists 11 influenza vaccines licensed for use in the U.S and these vaccines, along with their ingredients taken directly from the manufacturer package inserts, are as follows:

  • Influenza (Afluria) Trivalent & Quadrivalent contains sodium chloride, monobasic sodium phosphate, dibasic sodium phosphate, monobasic potassium phosphate, potassium chloride, calcium chloride, sodium taurodeoxycholate, ovalbumin, sucrose, neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B, beta-propiolactone, thimerosal (multi- dose vials). The multi-dose vial contains thimerosal—a mercury derivative. [8]
  • Influenza (Fluad) contains squalene, polysorbate 80, sorbitan trioleate, sodium citrate dehydrate, citric acid monohydrate, neomycin, kanamycin, barium, egg proteins, CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide), and formaldehyde. [8] Fluad also contains MF59C.1 adjuvant (MF59®), a squalene based oil-in-water emulsion. [9]
  • Influenza (Fluarix) Trivalent & Quadrivalent contains octoxynol-10 (Triton X-100), α-tocopheryl hydrogen succinate, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80), hydrocortisone, gentamicin sulfate, ovalbumin, formaldehyde, sodium deoxycholate, and sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride. [8]
  • Influenza (Flublok) Trivalent & Quadrivalent contains sodium chloride, monobasic sodium phosphate, dibasic sodium phosphate, polysorbate 20 (Tween 20), baculovirus and Spodoptera frugiperda cell proteins, baculovirus and cellular DNA, Triton X-100, lipids, vitamins, amino acids, and mineral salts. [8]
  • Influenza (Flucelvax) Trivalent & Quadrivalent contains Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cell protein, protein other than HA, MDCK cell DNA, polysorbate 80, cetyltrimethlyammonium bromide, and β-propiolactone. [8] Flucelvax 5 mL multi-dose vial formulation contains thimerosal. [10]
  • Influenza (Flulaval) Trivalent & Quadrivalent contains ovalbumin, formaldehyde, sodium deoxycholate, α-tocopheryl hydrogen succinate, polysorbate 80, and thimerosal (multi-dose vials). [8]
  • Influenza (Fluvirin) contains ovalbumin, polymyxin, neomycin, betapropiolactone, nonylphenol ethoxylate, thimerosal (in the 5 mL multidose vials). [8]
  • Influenza (Fluzone) Quadrivalent contains egg protein, octylphenol ethoxylate (Triton X-100), sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride solution, thimerosal (multi-dose vials), and sucrose. [8]
  • Influenza (Fluzone) High-Dose contains egg protein, octylphenol ethoxylate (Triton X-100), sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride solution, formaldehyde, and sucrose. [8]
  • Influenza (Fluzone) Intradermal contains egg protein, octylphenol ethoxylate (Triton X-100), sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride solution, and sucrose. [8]
  • Influenza (FluMist) Quadrivalent contains monosodium glutamate, hydrolyzed porcine gelatin, arginine, sucrose, dibasic potassium phosphate, monobasic potassium phosphate, ovalbumin, gentamicin sulfate, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). [8]

Additional information about influenza and influenza vaccines, including complete copies of influenza vaccine package inserts that also list contraindications, reported reactions, results of pre-licensure clinical trials and other facts, can be found on NVIC.org.

It is reasonable to assume that those who administer influenza vaccines regularly to people should know the ingredients of what they are giving. It’s not all that different from memorizing the ingredients of a few favorite food recipes. Neither is it unreasonable to assume those who give flu shots should know the potential side effects of each of the vaccines and the synergistic toxicity [11] of the ingredients that could provoke these reactions.

You would expect a command of this basic knowledge by doctors, nurses, and other health care professionals who are injecting these ingredients into nearly half the U.S. population. The next time a doctor recommends that you or your child get a flu shot, ask him or her to tell you exactly what is in the vaccine being recommended and see what kind of answer you get.

Read the full article at TVR.org.

Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.

References

1 Dr Russell Blaylock MD Dangers of Vaccines. (start at 15:51) YouTube.com May 18, 2014 (published).
2 Isabelle Z. Doctors admit on video that they know NOTHING about vaccinesNatural News May 18, 2016.
3 Sears RW. Ask Dr. Sears, Inside the Vaccine Book.
4 Dr. Lawrence Palevsky discusses ingredients of vaccines. What do vaccinations contain? YouTube.com May 3, 2009 (published).
5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Flu Vaccination Coverage, United States, 2015-16 Influenza Season. CDC.gov.
6 U.S. Population. Worldometers.info.
7 Food and Drug Administration—Package Inserts & FDA Product Approvals. Immunize.org.
8 CDC. Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary. CDC.gov.
9 Fluad Package Insert. Seqiris.
10 Flucelvax Quadrivalent Package Insert. Seqirus.
11 Cáceres M. Synergistic Toxicity of VaccinesThe Vaccine Reaction Sept. 29, 2015.

___
http://healthimpactnews.com/2017/most-medical-professionals-giving-vaccines-do-not-know-what-ingredients-they-contain/


http://themillenniumreport.com/?s=vaccines

 

 

 

President Trump Flu Shots Are The Greatest 'Scam' In Medical His

President Trump Flu Shots Are The Greatest 'Scam' In Medical His

https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLZX49q1VM8O0wTVaYupBh1Rq17yto_52t&params=OAFIAVgb&v=htiNHHRe2yk&mode=NORMAL&app=desktop
The Event Is coming soon
Published on Jan 30, 2017
The Event Is Coming Soon - President Trump Flu Shots Are The Greatest 'Scam' In Medical History

By: Jay Greenberg

Donald Trump has launched a scathing attack on Big Parma claiming that the use of flu shots on US citizens is the 'biggest medical scam in history' with large pharmaceutical companies taking advantage of vulnerable people by making them sick for profit.The President claims to have never taken a flu shot due to not liking the idea of injecting his body with "bad stuff".Since taking office, Trump has cracked down on Big Pharma, who he says are "getting away with murder," and has vowed to revamp federal laws for buying prescription drugs.
"Pharma has a lot of lobbyists and a lot of power and there is very little bidding. We're the largest buyer of drugs in the world and yet we don't bid properly and we're going to save billions of dollars."

YNW reports: In an interview with Opie and Anthony on Sirius XM, Trump slammed flu shots as “totally ineffective” and declared that he has never had one.
“I’ve never had one. And thus far I’ve never had the flu. I don’t like the idea of injecting bad stuff into your body. And that’s basically what they do. And this one (latest flu vaccine) has not been very effective to start off with.“I have friends that religiously get the flu shot and then they get the flu. You know, that helps my thinking. I’ve seen a lot of reports that the last flu shot is virtually totally ineffective.“Trump is right – flu shots are the greatest medical fraud in history. They are full of “bad stuff” including formaldehyde and mercury – two powerful neurotoxins – and the vaccine industry even admits that laboratory tests prove the popular jab does not work.Why is a toxic, medical hoax, backed by nothing but voodoo faith-based dogma and clever marketing, pushed on the whole population every year?Vaccines are the one medicine where no scientific evidence of safety or efficacy is required by anyone: not the FDA, not the CDC and not the media. Congress even passed a law protecting the vaccine industry with absolute legal immunity, even when they manufacture and sell defective products that injure and kill people.And vaccine manufacturers have been lying to us for years about toxic levels of mercury in flu shots. Everybody knows mercury is toxic to inject into the human body. That’s not debated except by irrational anti-science denialists.So why won’t manufacturers remove the mercury? And why does Big Pharma continue to push a product that the vaccine industry admits does not even work?

Source: http://themillenniumreport.com/2017/0... - http://themillenniumreport.com/?s=vaccines

Pct from Youtube, just in case they remove the video!
The Event Is coming soon
Published on Sep 24, 2016
John Anderson
1 year ago
Damn! Just when I decided this guy's full of it, he goes and tells the truth! Now, no one will listen to him! Maybe he'll make the government pay the vaccine injury funds to the families!
liabilitymate
1 year ago
I think you have to be a moron or just don't care with all the information now days to think that vaccinations do any good, they only do harm for profit$ of big pharma....

Ears To You
1 year ago
Think about it- a newborn who will seldom cross the path of much society BUT LETS JUST INJECT THIS BABY JUST IN CASE !!
HEB B AS EXAMPLE AND OTHERS TOO.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLZX49q1VM8O0wTVaYupBh1Rq17yto_52t&v=BowFetE1pkM&app=desktop

Donald Trump Vaccines Cause Autism

The Event Is coming soon
Published on Sep 24, 2016
John Anderson
1 year ago
Damn! Just when I decided this guy's full of it, he goes and tells the truth! Now, no one will listen to him! Maybe he'll make the government pay the vaccine injury funds to the families!
liabilitymate
1 year ago
I think you have to be a moron or just don't care with all the information now days to think that vaccinations do any good, they only do harm for profit$ of big pharma....

Ears To You
1 year ago
Think about it- a newborn who will seldom cross the path of much society BUT LETS JUST INJECT THIS BABY JUST IN CASE !!
HEB B AS EXAMPLE AND OTHERS TOO.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLZX49q1VM8O0wTVaYupBh1Rq17yto_52t&v=BowFetE1pkM&app=desktop

http://vaccines.news/

 

https://www.infowars.com/unintended-consequences-a-tale-of-two-hepatitis-b-studies/

 http://vaccines.news/

 

UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: A TALE OF TWO HEPATITIS B STUDIES

Exposing blanket prescriptions recommending all infants get hepatitis B vaccine

 
0
0
 
 

In 1991, US public health authorities began recommending that all infants get the hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine, stipulating that they receive three doses within the first six months of life, starting at birth.

The World Health Organization (WHO) followed suit with its own recommendation in 1992, instructing countries to vaccinate from birth even where hepatitis B virus was uncommon. Two 2018 studies (one in the US and one in India) take a closer look at the outcomes and implications of these blanket prescriptions. Although the studies focus on different aspects of their countries’ respective vaccine programs, both are cautionary tales, highlighting the fact that one-size-fits-all vaccine recommendations frequently steamroll over important biological risks and immune system subtleties, thereby introducing troublesome unintended consequences.

U.S. children and taxpayers on the hook

Until the early 2000s, the HepB vaccine in the US contained organic ethylmercury in the form of the preservative thimerosal—totaling 37.5 micrograms across the three doses. Regulators have never bothered to set any safety standards for ethylmercury, but government researchers have shown that the toxicity mechanisms of ethyl- and methylmercury (the type of mercury found in fish) are similar, and some believe that even the tiniest amounts carry a risk of adverse neuropsychological outcomes.

Fixated on the sole indicator of increasing HepB vaccine coverage, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) bragged in 2002 about having achieved a 90% national coverage rate in young children. However, a 2018 cross-sectional studypublished in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health strongly suggests that the 1990s-era thimerosal-containing HepB vaccine had far less praiseworthy consequences, causing considerable harm to children and also exacting a high price from US taxpayers.

The researchers used National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data to consider 1,192 boys aged 7-8 years—a sample statistically representative of over 24 million American boys. Building on their own and others’ prior research linking thimerosal to developmental disabilities, they considered boys who either did or did not receive three doses of thimerosal-containing (1994–2000) or thimerosal-reduced (2001–2007) HepB vaccine in infancy (the “exposure”), defining the outcome as increased long-term risk of receiving special education services. They restricted their sample to boys because of males’ greater susceptibility to mercury toxicity.

For the subgroup born between 1994 and 2000, boys who received three doses of thimerosal-containing HepB vaccine were at a more than nine-fold significantly higher risk of receiving special education services compared to boys receiving no doses of HepB vaccine. Extrapolating to the US population as a whole, this means that almost 1.3 million US boys born from 1994-2000 received special education services directly attributable to receiving three doses of thimerosal-containing HepB vaccine—costing taxpayers over $180 billion. An earlier study by some of the same authors found that in the decade from 1991–2001, exposure to thimerosal-containing HepB vaccines in the first six months of life resulted in an estimated 0.5–1 million US children being diagnosed with learning disabilities, representing lifetime costs in excess of $1 trillion.

Vaccine-induced versus natural immunity

As noted, the WHO has strongly promoted universal HepB vaccination and particularly the initial birth dose. However, in India, which introduced the HepB vaccine around 2006, approximately three-fifths (61%) of women deliver at home rather than in a health facility, making it next to impossible for health providers to administer newborn vaccines. In recognition of these realities, the Indian government’s two-pronged policy is to give HepB vaccine at birth to the 39% of babies born in institutional settings but to otherwise administer the first dose at six weeks. About 45% of Indian children receive the birth dose (although the WHO wants to double that number); irrespective of timing, 86% of Indian children reportedly receive all three HepB doses. However, India is home to an estimated one-third of the world’s unvaccinated children, meaning that many children still do not receive any HepB vaccine at all.

A 2018 study published in the Indian Journal of Pediatrics took advantage of these ready-made comparison groups. The multiregional study (2013–2015) recruited children 1-5 years of age who were already having blood drawn and whose parents consented to hepatitis B testing (N=2,671). Three-fifths (59%) of the children had received at least three doses of HepB vaccine, and just over half of these (880/1566) had their first dose at birth. The research team considered several intriguing questions:

  1. Are there any differences in vaccine efficacy for the two HepB schedules (birth dose versus six-week dose)? After testing all samples for a marker of chronic hepatitis B infection, the investigators concluded that birth vaccination offered “no added protection”—lending support to the government’s “pragmatic” approach of waiting until six weeks to vaccinate babies born at home.
  2. What are the levels of protective antibodies in fully HepB-vaccinated children, and do they change over time or according to birth dose? The researchers measured antibodies in a subset of 865 children who had received three doses of HepB vaccine. Seven in ten (70%) had protective levels of antibodies—but 30% of fully HepB-vaccinated children did not [emphasis added]. Moreover, when the researchers considered the children’s age, they found that vaccine-induced protection waned rapidly and significantly, falling from 82% of under-one-year-olds to 47% of five-year-olds. Receiving a birth dose made no difference.
  3. What are the levels of protective antibodies in children who have not received any HepB vaccine? Finally, the researchers examined hepatitis B immunity in 370 children who had never received any HepB vaccine. Nearly half (45%) of non-HepB-vaccinated one-year-olds were naturally immune, and 29% still had antibody protection at age 5. The researchers credited these protective levels of antibodies to natural, passively acquired immunity from unvaccinated mothers.

Overzealous promotion

The results of the two hepatitis B studies touch on many facets of the vaccine debate that the public health community is rarely, if ever, willing to discuss. These largely ignored topics include:

  • The ongoing, adverse neurodevelopmental impact of toxic vaccine ingredients such as aluminum adjuvants and thimerosal, which is still present in annual flu shots, some meningococcal meningitis vaccines and the Td (tetanus-diphtheria) booster;
  • The fact that economic and political factors—rather than vaccine effectiveness—are often key drivers of decisions about vaccine timing and schedules;
  • The failure of HepB (and other) vaccines to reliably generate protective antibody levels in all fully vaccinated individuals—this phenomenon of impaired immunogenicity is a widely known “Achilles’ heel” of many vaccines; and
  • The corresponding (and vastly underestimated) importance of natural immunity.

Regarding this latter point, the authors of the Indian HepB research, led by Dr. Jacob Puliyel, call attention to the “surprising” persistence of passively acquired hepatitis B antibodies in their own study population and in other studies. Pointing to studies of measles immunity, they note that mothers in highly measles-vaccinated communities have lower antibody levels and, therefore, far less ability to confer passive protection to their babies. This is because the measles vaccine “induces lower antibody levels than does natural infection and the antibody levels of vaccinated cohorts are no longer boosted by exposure to wild-type infection.” A study in the Czech Republic that compared 18-29-year-olds who were vaccinated and unvaccinated for mumps found that only 19% of vaccinated individuals in that age group had acquired immunity versus almost half (48%) of the unvaccinated, leading to the conclusion that only natural infection can lead to “long-term persistence of antibodies.” A growing number of studies also are indicating that prior exposure to natural infections such as measles and mumps may be health-protective later in life.

Back in 2003, Dr. Puliyel wrote a letter to the editor that questioned other researchers’ overestimation of the benefits of hepatitis B vaccination in terms of vaccine efficacy and cost per life-year saved. The letter concluded with a caution to guard against “overzealous” vaccine promotion. In the current climate of an ever-expanding vaccine schedule and hundreds more vaccines in the pipeline, those words of warning seem timelier than ever.

Toni Bark MD "Evidence Is Emerging That Vaccine Safety Studies Are Being Rigged By Pharma!"; 41:55 min.

Toni Bark MD "Evidence Is Emerging That Vaccine Safety Studies Are Being Rigged By Pharma!"; 41:55 min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcbimO5Rdj4

The Richie Allen Show

Published on Oct 27, 2016
SUBSCRIBE 74K
Please Support The Show – http://richieallen.co.uk/

http://vaccines.news/

REVEALED: Toxic Mechanism of Vaccine Aluminum; 23:09 min.

Real News with David Knight
Published on Nov 28, 2017
SUBSCRIBE 34K
New research from Keele Univ in Staffordshire, England revealed massive aluminum levels in brains of young children suffering from autism and the surprise revelation is that the lowest dosage is the most toxic!

http://vaccines.news/

Vaccine Safety Conference Session 16 Dr. Christopher Exley; 51:00 min.; CC-Ima prevod!

Vaccine Safety Conference Session 16 Dr. Christopher Exley; 51:00 min.; CC-Ima prevod!
https://youtu.be/JKfbkeQyw84
VaccineSafetyConf
Published on Nov 4, 2011
SUBSCRIBE 785
Dr. Christopher Exley- The Systemic Toxicity of Aluminium Adjuvants.

Dr. Christopher Exley is the Reader in Bioinorganic Chemistry at The Birchall Centre, Keele University in Staffordshire and Honorary Professor at the UHI Millennium Institute. Exley is a biologist (University of Stirling) with a PhD in the ecotoxicology of aluminium (University of Stirling). His research career (1984-present) has focused upon an intriguing paradox; 'how the third most abundant element of the Earth's crust (aluminium) is non-essential and largely inimical to life'. Investigating this mystery has required research in myriad fields from the basic inorganic chemistry of the reaction of aluminium and silicon to the potentially complex biological availability of aluminium in humans. Exley is also fascinated by the element silicon in relation to living things which, as the second most abundant element of the Earth's crust, is also almost devoid of biological function. One possible function of silicon is to keep aluminium out of biology (biota) and this area of study forms a large part of Exley's research.

http://vaccines.news/

3 Mineral Waters That Can Remove Aluminum from the Brain; 8:48 min.

3 Mineral Waters That Can Remove Aluminum from the Brain; 8:48 min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0XpLAduXrgatural Remedies
Published on Jan 23, 2017
SUBSCRIBE 7.8K
http://www.realfarmacy.com/mineral-wa...

3 Mineral Waters That Can Remove Aluminum from the Brain
by PAUL FASSA

Aluminum poisoning head. There has been a dramatic increase in neurological diseases linked to aluminum toxicity. The blood brain barrier doesn’t stop aluminum’s intrusion into our gray matter. Aluminum accumulates and remains in tissue that doesn’t have a rapid cellular turnover.

Apoptosis is the natural cell death and replacement process that occurs throughout the body, excluding cancer cells. Cancer cells keep reproducing and colonising into tumors unless apoptosis is introduced or the cells are outright killed from chemical compounds, both natural and synthetic.

Aluminum accrues to toxic levels over time in slow apoptotic cell turnover tissues, such as bone matter, the heart and the brain. The brain and its associated nervous system is where diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, MS, chronic fatigue and other neurological or auto-immune diseases manifest, including the complete autistic spectrum, from learning disorders to full blown autism.

There is no shortage of aluminum toxins in our environment. It’s in cookware, beverage containers, foil, cigarette smoke, cosmetics, antiperspirants, sunscreen, antacids, and those ubiquitous chemtrails that most ignore from which aluminum nanoparticles can be breathed into our lungs and routed directly into our blood or through the sinuses into our brains.

Aluminum is in all vaccines. Injecting aluminum bypasses the possibility of eliminating it through normal channels. Straight into the blood it goes to be carried into the brain and heart, adding to their accumulated aluminum toxicity loads.

According to Doctor Chris Exley, PhD, we have come into the aluminum age. Many trolling commentators love to explain how aluminum is the must common mineral on the planet and therefore it’s harmless. Dr. Exley has dedicated over two decades of his scientific life to researching aluminum toxicity. He calls the period of time from the early 20th Century to now the “Age of Aluminum.”

Before then, aluminum remained in the ground as the most abundant mineral in earth that hadn’t yet been mined. Dr. Exley claims mining aluminum and using it in so many ways corresponds to the marked increase of neurological diseases.



Doctor Chris Exley’s Message to the 2011 Vaccine Safety Conference

A key aspect of his conference delivery concerned helping vaccinated kids improve their neurological damage. Ironically, it involves the second most abundant mineral in mother earth – silica. Exley has put kids who had autism spectrum disorders or other neurological damage from vaccinations on a form of silica known as silicic acid with excellent results.

Silicic acid is basically oxygenated silica. Exley considers this the best and most bio-available way to get silica through the gut and into the blood, then into brain matter where it binds with the aluminum molecules and leads them out of brain cell tissue safely through the urine.

He had used a Malasysian mineral water called Spritzer on aluminum toxic children suffering from autism spectrum disorders with significant success. Aluminum is in almost all vaccines. Later he and his team had 15 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients use that water at the same rate of one liter per day for 13 weeks.

Aluminum levels were lower by anywhere from 50 to 70 percent in all the subjects involved, and of the 15 AD patients, eight no longer deteriorated and three actually showed substantial cognitive increase. Perhaps coconut oil is better for reversing AD, but mineral waters high in Orthosilicic or ionic silicic acid will reduce aluminum toxicity in the brain to help ward off AD.

The more USA accessible mineral waters with similar levels of silicic acid to Spritzer, which can volvic-water-triopenetrate the blood-brain barrier, are Volvic and Fiji. My personal favorite is Fiji because it has the highest level of ionic suspended silica as silicic acid and is the least expensive. I’ve seen it in WalMart at $1.99 per liter.

Also, People’s Chemist Shane Ellison analyzed various water bottles and said Fiji water bottles are free of BPA and “its chemical cousins”. Others he rates highly as BPA free are Voss, Evian, and Smart Water.

The suggested protocol is at least five days consuming a 1.5 liter bottle of water daily. More is required for high levels of aluminum toxicity. Dr. Exley considers drinking the whole bottle within an hour as the most efficient method of detoxing aluminum from the brain.

http://vaccines.news/

Flu Vaccines: What You Need To Know; 26:38 min.

Flu Vaccines: What You Need To Know; 26:38 min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwkmKpmhBFE


Real News with David Knight
Published on Dec 28, 2017
SUBSCRIBE 34K
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny talks about the effectiveness of flu vaccines, how effectiveness is subtly defined by the industry and how to legally opt out if you choose to do so.

http://vaccines.news/