MASS EXTINCTION event now under way that will decimate the global human population; 8:53 min.
MASS EXTINCTION event now under way that will decimate the global human population; 8:53 min.
Published on Aug 20, 2017
A hotly-debated study led by Professor Gerardo Ceballos at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico warns that the human population explosion is leading to the widespread contamination and destruction of the planet, ultimately collapsing life support systems upon which human civilization depends.

Stay informed at
News & Politics
Standard YouTube License
leon mc pilibin6 days ago
Fukushima,Fukushima,Fukushima,there is your extinction event,but nobody is reporting this,, WHY NOT?
Reply 307
View all 80 replies
Sara Balls
Sara Balls1 day ago
leon mc pilibin cause its a HOAX
Reply 1
Sara Balls
Sara Balls1 day ago
you ignore your own life home town city yet demand FUKUSHIMA!!! lolol
Paul Arrowsmith
Paul Arrowsmith6 days ago
I agree that Big Pharma has been pushing the drug industry down the throat of the world, that needs to stop. I agree that we need to stop pouring PCBs into the ground that get into our food sources, that needs to stop. But, "Climate Change" you need to stop. Let's see you want to get rid of CO2, "Carbon Dioxide"... "Right". People and animals exhale CO2 (as bi-product of breathing) and plants inhale CO2 (as a food source). Let's see take away the all the CO2, then the people, animals and plant are gone. No more planet earth. That sounds really smart.
Show less
Reply 53
View all 13 replies
Julie Williams
Julie Williams2 days ago
Paul Arrowsmith We are basically killing our selves.
Sara Balls
Sara Balls1 day ago
Paul Arrowsmith dad?
David Johanson
David Johanson5 days ago
Local, sustainable agriculture, like Mohat Mghandi said everyone should be expected to do several hours of food labor daily, but no one listened.
Reply 37
View all 8 replies
Latonia Griswold
Latonia Griswold2 days ago
1caramarie your 70 and sound like your 15 you obviously dont now about the chemicals put into the seeds and soils nitwit
Sara Balls
Sara Balls1 day ago
David Johanson question is did you? if not youre comment is highly hypnocritisal
Real-Batman6 days ago
We are at the point now where life will become unsustainable. We use more from Nature and return nothing. So we will get what we caused.
Reply 34
View all 9 replies
Allen Marlin
Allen Marlin3 days ago
You can save us Batman !
Darieus-Ray moffett
Darieus-Ray moffett3 days ago
Y'all are all dumb did you even watch the video?? We are killing us and our planet you can see it everywhere...GMOs are real..the arctic ice melting thats real global warming thats real.wake up and see that corporation (most) only care about money and they dont even care that its killing us...killing children
Reply 3
fried rice
fried rice5 days ago
Don't forget the food we eat is DEAD! Not just processed foods, but those fresh fruits and veggies sold in supermarkets, produced on huge coorate farms with the use of chemicals, those chemicals, fertilisers, insecticides and herbicides have killed the soil. Soil was once a living organism and the food we grew in it drew life-giving nutrients from the soil. Dead soil produces dead food. The fruit and vegitables you buy today have no where near the amount of nutrition of similar food you bought a couple decades ago. Best thing you can do for yourself and your family is to grow as much fruit and vegitables as you can, ORGANICALLY. The food you grow won't be as pretty and perfect looking as the stuff in the stores, but it will feed your body so much better. Some blemishes and insect damage won't hurt you. Dead food will.
Show less
Reply 18
View all 3 replies
77GSlinger3 days ago
you forgot to mention it is almost impossible to find ripe fruit anywhere, even fruit stands and farmer's markets these days. It is all picked way too green and never ripens, tastes like shit and has the worst texture imaginable, all for a profit driven worship of Mammon! there fore modern fruit is essentially worthless, here in the good old usa!
Read more
Reply 2
corinth11212 days ago
fried rice and eat some hot dogs!
Reply 1
liferegenerator6 days ago
Cool Mike
Reply 4
Curt's Clocks
Curt's Clocks6 days ago
devaluation of currency -> Consumerism -> Materialism -> Pollution
Reply 6
Antje Cobbett
Antje Cobbett4 days ago
Yes, yes, yes, and what might YOUR solution be?
FireOrWater16 days ago
NASA plans to release a lot lot lot of balloons filled with organisms at the eclipses? Make sure you are totally covered up for a few days and with air filter masks... This makes me sick [NO pun intended]... This is how they 'tell us' what they are doing encoded!
Reply 19
miapdx Portland
miapdx Portland5 days ago
FireOrWater1 I saw that. On the NASA site. They are actually sending bacteria up into the stratosphere. To see how they react (yeah sure, I don't buy that.)
Reply 6
Antje Cobbett
Antje Cobbett4 days ago
NASA can do that at anytime, but well, this time it's over the US. Too bad. Maybe you should write a science fiction novel!
brett cleveland
brett cleveland6 days ago
It is really sad but it is ti late!! :(
Reply 9
MATT C5 days ago
This will make the UN very happy, their AGENDA 21 & AGENDA 30 want to cull us down to 500 000 000. Its all part of the plan!
Reply 13
Antje Cobbett
Antje Cobbett4 days ago
Then we'll just have to suck it up and deal with it.
Timotheos Petros
Timotheos Petros5 days ago
Please don't call the earth 'the planet', Mike. That's nothing but junk astronomy for the masses.
Reply 12
NextOfKen4x5 days ago
Chem Trail!
Reply 12
anthcrich5 days ago
The first problem is that ... We, the people, are at fault. But most of us are indentured servants born into a system of bondage that we cannot escape. We have been indoctrinated into capitalistic servitude. We believe that we are just trying to survive. We go to jobs which will require more and more increasing specialization. We do our jobs, then we spend our cash on things to quench our indoctrination. We are the problem. Another bigger and most significant problem lies with large corporations. When they become too large they facilitate the erosion of civil liberties and democracy. They adhere to their capitalist directive which is to make money and increase the making of money. Corporations are entities in of themselves because of their business model. The executives are not really to blame. They are merely fulfilling their specialized occupational objectives. If they are good at their job it means more corporate influence. Any company making billions of dollars becomes an international sovereign entity. Like a living creature it creates its own path for survival. It directs its research but will corrupt it to its biases. It controls politicians who fall under their (financial) political umbrella. These politicians then design laws that preserve the corporations' business interests. The Government becomes subjected to fulfilling corporate interests. So wars are then waged in the name of "democracy" or "for humanitarian reasons like world safety" but the real reason is to legitimize their actions so the landscape is available for business "resource exploitation" or to pave the way for expanding the "market". The multinational corporation mirrors the monopolistic company. It bullies opponents to its agendas. There is no way to stop these juggernauts. Democracy becomes a diminishing illusion. Your candidates, regardless of ideological rhetoric, are exactly the same. They exist to perpetuate the illusion of choice. The only solution is to limit the corporation. There must be limits placed on a corporations size. This sounds so un-democratic but it is the only solution.
Show less
Reply 3
Antje Cobbett
Antje Cobbett4 days ago
We can all escape this system IF we want to! You can, too! Join us!
Robert Matthews
Robert Matthews6 days ago
Did you think you were going to live forever?
Reply 2
same name
same name5 days ago
Robert Matthews yup I do, w/ Jesus
Reply 6
Moxy5 days ago (edited)
Robert Matthews No, but I don't need my government spraying posion in the air and seas. Global warming is a hoax
Reply 7
healpastlives.com5 days ago
5G, 5G, 5G small cells everywhere: here is your extinction event but very few are reporting this! WHY NOT?
Reply 2
Antje Cobbett
Antje Cobbett4 days ago
Stop buying and you'll be ok. Just stop buying!
Gary M
Gary M6 days ago
We're living in the end times
Read your bible
Reply 43
View all 10 replies
Diana SUNSHINE Wulf2 days ago
Sara Balls
Sara Balls1 day ago
Gary M i read the bible when i was young. it helped me grow so hungry for more. especially the part where it says we all get ice cream before we die during the end times.
yogini sd
yogini sd6 days ago (edited)
Mike, this world is not meant to last forever, and us being on it is not a natural addition, who we are.... well, ACTUAL spirit filled people, we are not in fear, our world is not the physical one, we do not die like the empty golem die, THEY are scared shitless. It is THEM who only have this world and this lifetime, and soon enough, they will no longer exist as even their geoengineered habitat becomes uninhabitable, and their engineered meat suits mixed with their tech, even those are not enough to harbor their evil. :)
Read more
Reply 8
David Klimmek
David Klimmek5 days ago
yogini sd ..excellent post.
Reply 3
Danzigmann3 days ago
It's Capitalism that has fuelled exponential population growth which fuels the massive destruction and raping of our dying planet pure and simple! We've got 30 years left if we're lucky!
Reply 1
Constitution_893 days ago
Danzigmann There's nothing wrong with Capitalism you Marxist Snot-rag. The problem is GREED, Not Capitalism. When Greed and Domination is the driving force it is called Crony-Capitalism and that equals Evil. Got it Karl?
Reply 1
wisdomgametv5 days ago
Hard to watch. Here's the thing: The world's not in danger. It will survive. New species, genus, will appear. Man will become extinct.
Reply 1
Antje Cobbett
Antje Cobbett4 days ago
That's right.
Patriot News Network
Patriot News Network6 days ago
Oh Christ. Global warming shilling.

We have climate change because Christ is coming back. He said it would happen 2000 years ago.
Reply 34
View all 14 replies
natureboy tom
natureboy tom4 days ago
Eva Song, They cant help themselves Eva, they are bible belt deluded lunatics of 'man made' fake religions, to keep the masses in control and scared. May as well believe in the BoogyMan. ;)
Reply 3
5milamila4 days ago
...and lucky for you natureboy timmay, the globalists all believe in and follow the boogyman except in their case, they all prefer to call him Lord Satan. :) Ignorance is bliss.....too bad it may cost you your soul. Good day timmay.

Government Tells Funeral Homes to Prepare for Mass Death “Just in Case”

Friday, August 11, 2017 10:55

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More...

“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization, and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.” – Eco92 Earth Charter

“Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind” Theodore Roosevelt

“Depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World.” Henry Kissinger

“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine

It’s obvious the ruling elite have a death wish for you and me, and they will stop at nothing until it has been fully implemented. Agenda 21 and the Kissinger Report are solid evidence of this sickening plan to limit population using war, famine, pestilence, food, geoengineering, GMO’s and sterilants.

In the video below I expose how governments are making preparations for mass death. Including everything from FEMA coffins to preparing Funeral Homes to running mock emergency drills. The truth of the matter is, they see something ahead. Whether it’s an EMP, CME, pandemic, economic crisis, war, or…. they are preparing….

It is no secret that the elite wants you and I dead, and no longer do they hid it under, no, it’s out in the open and they are proud of their stance, and any numb-nut who denies it, well, they can just rest in their stupidity.

“If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh

The truth is the government’s claim of overpopulation is a straight up LIE! Daily the mainstream media bombards us with news articles reinforcing the idea that humans are infesting the planet and overpopulating it like parasites sucking it dry of its resources.

These bureaucrats have managed to convinced millions of their scheme, when in fact, it’s all a part of their plan to shove the ‘mass death’ agenda down people’s throats all while claiming they are ‘saving the Earth!’It’s absurd!

The truth is if all 6.9 billion of us stood shoulder to shoulder and gathered together in the same general location it would fill only the state of Los Angeles. Or if everyone in the world was given a small house and yard and were once again gathered together in the same general location, it would fill only the states of Texas, California, and New Mexico with room to spare.

Don’t believe me? Let’s  do the math. Texas has 171 million acres, California has 101 million acres, and New Mexico has 77 million acres, which is a grand total of 349 million acres of land. We can safely assume most households house two persons, (usually it’s more, but we’ll stick with two) If each household was given 0.10 acre (or 20 people per acre because there are 2 persons per household; which leaves plenty of room for a house and land); then we would have the total number of occupants at 6,980,000,000 persons (349 million acres x 20 people per acre). Which is more than enough room to house our 6,900,000,000 population. Keep in mind this doesn’t even take into consideration people living in apartments. The demographics can change based on how people are concentrated.

Thomas Malthus’ Overpopulation Lie

Thomas Malthus, who is the originator of the overpopulation lie, was a British mathematician. His most studied work, “An Essay on the Principle of Population as it Affects the Future Improvements of Society, with Remarks on the Speculations of M. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers,” was first published around the late 1700′s. Init, he stated, “Overpopulation would destroy the world unless war, famine, and disease rose to check human growth.”

He theorized that when the population increased and food production increased only arithmetically, then food production would no longer be able to keep up with the populace. He then declared that the world would be out of food by the year 1890.Obviously, he was dead wrong and yet we still see his principles applied today.

But how realistic is his belief that food would not keep up with demand? Consider this, it takes about 300 sq. meters to feed one person for a year. Since a kilometer is 1,000 meters, we could feed 3,333 people per sq. kilometer, but let’s use 3,000 people per sq. kilometer to make math easy.  Meaning it would take 2,333,333 sq. kilometers (or 3000 ÷ 7,000,000,000) to feed the entire population for a year.

The total farmland in the US is about 922,000,000 acres of land.  There are 247.1 acres per sq. kilometer, meaning there is a total of 3,731,282 sq. kilometers (or 922,000,000 ÷ 247.1) of farm land. That’s more than the 2,333,333 sq. kilometers needed to feed the entire population. In other words, the farmland in the US can feed us all!

So why do the elite Continue to Insist we are Overpopulated?

That’s simple….MONEY, MONEY, MONEY, MONEY, MONEY! Along with many major corporations, they seek any opportunity to be billionaires. But even worse,  these power elite –per the Georgia Guidestones– desire serious population reduction. Instead of the 7 billion population, they desire 500,000,000 people. Ultimately their end game is EUGENICS!

Al Gore, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, and others like them, are using their power, wealth, and influence to manipulate the masses. They believe they can decide who is worthy to live and die. Their eugenics agenda lives on, and the bought and controlled media continues to churn out propaganda telling us we have to die so that the Earth (and the elite) may live on. What a load of crap!

In conclusion, fertility rates are rising, abortions are skyrocketing, contraception is in high demand, governments are limiting the number of children in China, we are eating sterilizing foods, and drinking fluoride water, which is preventing us from any major population growth. Eventually, we’ll enter a new paradigm in which the elderly outnumber the younger. In 30 years or so we will see the full effect of what the power elite have in store for us. It’s about time we take a stand! We the People, HAVE HAD ENOUGH!



Government Tells Funeral Homes To Prepare For Mass Death “Just In Case”; 7:17 min.

Government Tells Funeral Homes To Prepare For Mass Death “Just In Case”

Upozorenje!!!! Uvozna Hrana - Ми смо канта за њихово смеће!- Kupujte Domace !!!!

Upozorenje!!! Nasa Uvozna Hrana - Ми смо канта за њихово смеће!
Published on Aug 25, 2017
Више на:
News & Politics
Standard YouTube License
Игор Милићевић15 hours ago
Где је домаћа храна?У којим продавницама?
Reply 8
View all 8 replies
TOMA DIPLOMA12 hours ago
Njima i jeste u cilju da zavade sve sto sze moze zavadit, Zavadi pa vladaj....narod sa policjom, seljaka sa onima iz grada...daj otreznite se vise..narod mora da se ujedini...i sve dok toga ne bude, i ne zasluzujemo da zivimo bolje.
Reply 1
CoopS12 hours ago
pa bas i grdim narod je glasa za ono zasta glasa od 2000-te
Reply 1
Pazar 500
Pazar 50015 hours ago
Za sta je narod istocne Evrope SLAVS ne moras biti doktor nauka da znas sta to znaci na latinskom..
Reply 4
View all 4 replies
Pazar 500
Pazar 50014 hours ago
Stefan Jovic Nisam mislio da je od Slavs nastalo Sloveni nego da sovinisticki zapadnjaci na Slovene gledaju kao na Slavs /Schiavi sto Sloveni sad i jesu osim Rusa politicki ali obican Slovenski narod zivi po zapadnjackoj kulturi i tradiciji.
Reply 1
Nikola Nikovic
Nikola Nikovic12 hours ago
Stefan Jovic cuti budalo
Reply 1
KeRatniK12 hours ago
Borise gresis. Za ovaj problem je krivo Ministarstvo Trgovine. Oni se bave proverom kvaliteta robe i uvozom. Nije problem EU sto nasi inspektori ne rade svoj posao.Mislim da bi prvo treali ocistiti svoje dvoriste, pa tek onda pljuvati po EU. Ipak odgovornost je na nama.
Reply 3
Коста Томашевић
Коста Томашевић9 hours ago
Јел то оно - зашто нас бомбардују Слобо зликовче ..
Има и до министарства, али ако ЕУ извози нама неки производ који ми сами не производимо (а ЕУ нам је највећи спољнотрговински партнер), треба ли онда неко да умре, због сниженог квалитета производа? Овде се заправо највише види политика ''меког суверенитета'' где читава југоисточна Европа не може да се одупре вољи Брисела, а знамо ко је заправо Брисел (као да се Белгија ту ишта пита)
Show less
Reply 2
Marti21 hour ago
Nas nista ne sprecava da pravimo kvalitetne proizvode, ako to uopste i umemo. Mi ne moramo kupovati proizvode iz inostranstva ako necemo. Da bi smo pravili mi nasu domacu kvalitetnu hranu trerba dost da se poradi na zakonima, tehnologiji i kontroli kvaliteta u proizvodnji.
Vama Jelic
Vama Jelic2 hours ago
Србија није Источна Европа....Јел може Борис да објасни шта значи "КУПУЈ ДОМАЋЕ"....Јел то значи да треба да купујемо робу:Фрикома, Дијаманта, Соко Штарка, Хенкел Мериме.....
Reply 1
Maki11 hours ago
Naravno kupuj domace to svaka napredna, patriotska zemlja radi. Ulazite u svoje proizvode i ljude a ne pare da trce preko granice i nadmasuju brojeve azulanata/migranta koji idu uistom pravcu, zapad.
Reply 3
Nik Jovanov
Nik Jovanov11 hours ago
Ja sam ovo znao jos pre 10 godina. Telefon kupljen u CH i telefon kupljen u Srbiji,iste marke, serije itd. ako se uporedi, primer kamera, uvidece se razlika.
Reply 1
spiderman spiderman2
spiderman spiderman211 hours ago
Obrati pažnju na titl! U prilogu iz Hrvatske, kažu: ''umjetni zaslađivači'' a na srpskom ste preveli ''umetnuti zaslađivači'' što nije tačno, trebali ste da prevedete, '' veštački zaslađivači ''. U svakom slučaju, srećno nam trovanje. :)
Reply 1
Александар Матић
Александар Матић12 hours ago (edited)
Ма хајде, где ћеш ти натерати Србина да плати нешто домаће а три динара скупље? Прво, ретко ко уопште гледа порекло робе. Друго, разлике у цени нису много велике, од динар, два до десет двадесет, најчешће. Народ наравно бира оно што је јефтиније, јер се овде и за пет динара људи сагињу на улици.

А што се тиче овог "Купуј код сељака, то је домаће" паметњаковића - код сељака можеш да купиш сезонске прехрамбене производе. Не можеш да купиш средства за хигијену, одећу, обућу и све остало што користиш. Да ми је да видим тог ко само купује сирову храну. Не размишљају људи пре него што лупе.

Да не помињем да је куповина воћа и поврћа од сељака руски рулет као и у маркету. Ко је једном видео како и колико сељаци прскају и третирају производе, њему се на пијацу и не иде.

Истина, куповином домаћег се потискује страни производ, то је тзв гласање новчаником. Ако нико не купује, неће ни увозити. Али треба прво неко да погледа етикету.

Идеја вам на сваком ћошку, пола прехрамбених производа иде преко Агрокора. Онда су ту марке мегамаркета (сваки има своју) који су углавном увозна роба али су пар динара јефтинији.

И ко онда гледа да купи нешто домаће? Кад живиш од данас до сутра, и толико ти и сеже размишљање и брига, онда није битно шта ћеш да купиш него да на крају рачун буде 50-100 динара мањи кад изађеш из продавнице ако је то икако могуће.

А што се тиче тих страних производа, како се узме. Неки су им одвратни, неки су бољи од наших. На пример они не могу да присмрде нашем Смокију, Најлепшим жељама, Плазми или Еурокрему (од њихове Нутеле ми се повраћа - добијеш дијабетес истог тренутка).

Са једне стране гледамо да прођемо што јефтиније, али има и тога да се куповином страног осећамо као снобови. Мсм ето код те Нутеле - кад купиш нутелу ти си модеран, волиш што воле модерни млади, а ако купиш Еурокрем онда си сеља који не може да прежали Југославију или деведесете или шта већ.

Нису странци НИШТА криви - они су трговци који продају свој производ а на нама је да исте купимо или не. Криви смо ми који из овог или оног разлога купујемо њихов производ. Нема много домаћих произвођача, али и кад има, опет се људи пречесто хватају за увозно. Није странац крив кад ти нуди балегу а ти је сав срећан купиш јер је три динара јефтинија од домаћег хлеба. То је трговина, купац бира.
Read more
Коста Томашевић
Коста Томашевић9 hours ago
Ствар је у томе што неко може до сутра да избегава Идеу и сличне стране трговинске ланце ако држава ради све да их заштити. Фриком ми први пада на памет, власник Ивица Тодорић из Загреба (Агрокор). Увек сам се питао како нема више ланаца као што је ДИС где се чак виде покушаји увођења ћирилице, али авај. Мислим да је власник ДИС-а из Крагујевца. У сваком случају, такве ствари се решавају на вишем нивоу, а не средњовековним средствима и бојкотом. Мада, морам признати да и сам од случаја ''Чоколинда'' избегавам хрватске производе, колико је то могуће. Кажем опет, огроман део није до обичног човека, што Малагурски и сам спомиње.
Read more
Александар Матић
Александар Матић2 hours ago
Не знам шта треба да се деси да се људима смучи то "ништа није до обичног човека" или "огроман део није до обичног човека". Него до кога је? Ајд оладите са том кастрацијом људи и свођење на аморфну масу.

Наравно да је све до обичног човека и онога што он ради или не ради. Кад је однос 100.000:1 онда не може да прође "огроман део није до обичног човека". Апсолутно све је до обичног човека, почевши са гледањем етикете до постављања у фотеље тих на највишем нивоу. Као што је и до њега и на његовој савести кад не уради ништа.

Доста више са прањем савести и колективном кастрацијом. Што је много, много је.
Read more
Kre Ator
Kre Ator13 hours ago
Fala bogu pa zivim na selu
Reply 2
Persa Vučić
Persa Vučić14 hours ago
Ovo je na ,,Sputnjiku'' - sve je onda jasno. A da li je u Rusiji hrana kvalitetna? U Rusiji je prosečna penzija 50 evra, pa nije teško zaključiti koliku količinu prehrambenih namirnica prosečan ruski penzioner sebi i svojoj porodici može da kupi i koliko je to kvalitetno.
View all 4 replies
Bosko Jaksic
Bosko Jaksic12 hours ago
Persa Vučić jesi li bila u Rusiji?
Reply 2
danijel zlatkovic
danijel zlatkovic10 hours ago
Evo ovako... Imate na internetu sajt Numbeo, koji je besplatan, i na njemu imate do detalja informacije o svim parametrima zivotnog standarda i troskova u bilo koje dve zemlje na planeti koje sami odaberete, i to iskazano u bilo kojoj valuti koju sami odaberete. Samo upisite u Google 'Numbeo' i lako cete doci do sajta. Standard u Rusiji je, kao i prakticno bilo gde drugde u svetu, visi nego u Srbiji. Mi smo medju specijalno siromasnim zemljama kada su plate i penzije u pitanju u poredjenju prema lokalnim cenama i troskovima. Tako da zaista ne mozemo smatrati da smo bolje placeni od Rusa i ruskih penzionera, to je smesno.
Read more
Reply 1
Tesla-Effect14 hours ago
Otkad su nam Krvati poceli carinski rat, od tad gledam na pakovanju odakle poizvod dolazi.
Reply 4
samed260414 hours ago
Samo YU, nikad EU
Reply 2
Zoki. x
Zoki. x15 hours ago
Jedini novinar koj iznosi opasnu istinu !
Reply 12
Sasquatch15 hours ago
A daj.. Bi ja rado kupovo domace... Da nam ne deru kozu sa ledja za isti (a u vecini slucajeva - Gori) kvalitet.
Evo par primera:
1. Kupio crnu majicu dugih rukava, 100% pamuk, sa slikom (koja evo i nakon 30 pranja i dalje ista) za 1,8e - 200 dinara u Francuskoj.
- Najon pijaca, Novi Sad, obicna bela potkosulja sa debelim procentom sintetike - 500 dinara. Pa da vam *ebem....
2. Franuska - Carfure (nas C market na primer) mesnata kobasica - DELIKATES! Pazi delikates, 300 grama, = 2,4 evra. 300 dinara.
Carnexova/Neoplantina (ili nebitno neka treca) cajna kobasica = 800 dinara.. A sranje je zesce, 60% masnoca, 30% aditivi i zacini, i 10% ko zna kakvog mesa.
Read more
Reply 1
Spajko15 hours ago
Ове мултинационалне компаније ће нам доћи главе! Купујмо домаће!!!
Reply 4
Против Глобал
Против Глобал15 hours ago
И то "домаће" је страно.
Reply 3
Против Глобал
Против Глобал15 hours ago
Нисте имали муда да гласате за радикале, па сада уживајте у жуто-напредњачким говнима.
Reply 6
rici kruspe
rici kruspe15 hours ago
Jbg,sve dok ponosno nosimo epitet nize rase,ovako cemo prolaziti.
Reply 3
Милован Вујадиновић
Милован Вујадиновић15 hours ago
а ови наши (???) политичари нас гурају у ту секту звану еу зашто па из приложеног се види "ТРЕБАЈУ ИМ СВИЊЕ ДА ПОЈЕДУ(а прво да плате) ОТПАД"

What is “junk science”?

Junk science is faulty scientific data and analysis used to advance special interests and hidden agendas.

Examples of special interests include:

  • The media may use junk science to produce sensational headlines and programming, the purpose of which is to generate increased readership and viewership. More readers and viewers mean more revenues from advertisement. The media may also use junk science to advance personal or organizationsl social and political agendas.
  • Personal injury lawyers, sometimes referred to simply as trial lawyers (as in the American Association of Trial Lawyers or ATLA), may use junk science to extort settlements from deep-pocketed businesses or to bamboozle juries into awarding huge verdicts.
  • Social and political activists may use junk science to achieve social and political change.
  • Government regulators may use junk science to expand regulatory their authority, increase their budgets o advance the political agenda of elected officials.
  • Businesses may use junk science to bad-mouth competitors’ products, make bogus claims about their own products, or to promote political or social change that would increase sales and profits.
  • Politicians may use junk science to curry favor with special interest groups, to be politically correct or to advance their own personal political beliefs.
  • Individual scientists may use junk science to achieve fame and fortune.
  • Individuals who are ill (real or imagined) may use junk science to blame others for causing their illness. Individuals may also use junk science to seek fame and fortune.

CAUTION: Being wrong is not the same as being guilty of junk science.

Wrong science becomes junk science only when its obvious or easily-determined flaws are ignored and it is then used to advance some special interest.

What is

Since April 1, 1996, has led the fight against junk science, including being named:

Who publishes is published by, Inc. It is edited by Steve Milloy.

Who is Steve Milloy?

Steve Milloy is a recognized leader in the fight against junk science with more than 25 years of accomplishment and experience. Credited with popularizing the term “junk science,” Milloy is the founder and publisher of and, from 2000-2009, wrote the popular “Junk Science” column for He is an expert on energy, environmental and public health issues, a public affairs consultant, author, TV/radio commentator and public speaker. Milloy was trained in natural sciences, biostatistics, law and securities regulation. He has also been an attorney for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a broker-dealer; and a registered securities principal, investment fund manager, non-profit executive, print/web columnist on science and business issues, and coal company executive. Milloy served on the Trump EPA transition team.


Mr. Milloy has authored the following books:

Mr. Milloy has authored over 600 articles/columns published in major newspapers/web sites, including the Wall Street JournalInvestor’s Business Daily,, Financial TimesNational Post (Canada), USA TodayLos Angeles TimesWashington TimesNew York PostNew York Sun and other print and web outlets.


Milloy holds:

  • B.A. in Natural Sciences, Johns Hopkins University;
  • Master of Health Sciences (Biostatistics), Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health;
  • Juris Doctorate, University of Baltimore; and
  • Master of Laws (Securities regulation) from the Georgetown University Law Center.


The following notable individuals and/or organizations have endorsed Mr. Milloy’s work:

Pre-eminent Scientists and Public Health Heroes

  • Philip Abelson, Phd, Editor, Science, 1962-1984, winner of the National Medal of Science, Co-discoverer of Neptunium. “… Milloy is one of a small group who devotes time, energy and intelligence to the defense of truth and science. His current book deserves widespread reading, quotation and responsive action,”‘ from the back cover of Junk Science Judo.
  • Donald H. Henderson, M.D., Dean, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 1977-1990, Director, UN Global Smallpox Eradication Program, National Medal of Science. “(Milloy’s Silencing Science is) a perceptive and eminently readable book… remarkable insights into the manipulation of science for other than laudable ends,” from the back cover of Silencing Science.
  • Frederick Seitz, PhD, First President, National Academy of Sciences. “This valuable book (Junk Science Judo) deals in a thorough manner with one of the serious scientific problems of our times, the intentional distortion of the methods of science in attempts to reach conclusions that are not justified by qualified scientific research…,” from the back cover of Junk Science Judo.

Statesmen & Business Leaders

  • Steve Forbes, President and Chief Executive Officer of Forbes. “Green Hell is the `inconvenient truth’ on extremist, growth-killing environmentalism. A must-read for those interested in keeping America free and prosperous,” from the back cover of Green Hell. About the Free Enterprise Action Fund: “… it’s precept is a sound one,” from “Fact and Comment,” Forbes, April 24, 2006.
  • Jonathan Hoenig, CapitalistPig Asset Management. “Green Hell… is a brash and gutsy repudiation of the environmental dogma now integrated into almost every aspect of modern life… Throughout this bold, tightly written, well-researched book, Milloy illustrates the overriding goal of the Green movement: Not to preserve nature for man, but to protect nature from man. Green Hell astutely unmasks the dangerous ramifications of that philosophy,” from Not Easy — or Smart — Being Green, May 9, 2009.
  • Vaclav Klaus, President of the European Union and President of the Czech Republic. “(Green Hell) describes why the world can’t afford to fall for global warming alarmism and environmental hysteria. Steve Milloy shows how to avoid the environmentalists’ vision of our future,” from the back cover of Green Hell.


  • Barron’s. (Green Hell is a) “convincing book,” from Big Questions, Five Good Answers, February 5, 2011.
  • Fred Barnes, Executive Editor, the Weekly Standard. “Green Hell explains why Americans can’t afford to fall for Al Gore’s `the debate is over’ line on global warming. While we’re all for the environment, Green Hell explains why we need to oppose the environmentalists,” from the back cover of Green Hell.
  • Neil Cavuto, Fox News. “Steve Milloy wrote the definitive book on [modern environmentalism]…”, September 1, 2011. “[Milloy] fill[s] a valuable role [debunking junk science], October 31, 2012.
  • Peter Foster, National Post (Canada) columnist: “‘Thank Gaia for Steve Milloy…,” from “Breaking out of green hell”, June 19, 2009.
  • Daniel Gross, Slate. “Milloy… made a spectacle at the annual meeting of Goldman Sachs,” from “Thank you for investing,” (May 4, 2006)
  • Investor’s Business Daily. “… so long as (the corruption of science) continues, it’s a threat to future discoveries of real merit as well as to our freedoms. Daylight helps, as does transparency-encouraging critical websites, such as Steve Milloy’s,” from a A Banner Day for Junk Science, January 6, 2011.
  • Nuclear Street:“Sometimes a guy has to step back, take a long deep breath and reassess everything he thought he knew as fact. Some people conduct this exercise without even thinking, critically examining all that floats their way with the dispassionate eyes of an objective observer. Christopher Columbus did it. Galileo Galilei did it. Charles Darwin did it. Albert Einstein did it. And the world has not been the same since. Now, Steve Milloy does it…,” from NS Book Review of Green Hell, July 2, 2009.
  • Charles Payne, FOX News. ‘Insightful.’ January 30, 2015.
  • Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. “Kudos to’s Steve Milloy for debunking suspect blame-mankind research behind demonization of humanity’s mercury emissions,” from … Vapors over vapors, April 21, 2011.
  • Popular Science. “… made an impact,” from “The Battle,” July 2012.
  • Rolling Stone. Milloy is a “leading debunker” of global warming alarmism, from the November 17, 2005 issue.
  • John Stossel, correspondent, ABC News and Fox Business News. “I wish Junk Science Judo had been available when I was doing daily consumer reports. It hits the nail on the head about the media’s role in health scares and scams. I wish all consumer and reporters would read it,” from the back cover of Junk Science Judo.
  • Washington Post. is “popular.” (Feb. 21, 1999, October 12, 1999).
  • RepublicanAmerican (Waterbury CT). “The invaluable Steve Milloy…,” (from “Asthma Illusions Fading,” January 15, 2013).
  • Juliet Eilperin, Washington Post. JunkScience is “well read.” (Twitter, February 18, 2013).
  • Kelly Vance, East Bay Express. Milloy is one of the “slickest” deniers.” (March 10, 2015).
  • Inside Climate News. Milloy is on the ‘Who’s Who List of Climate Denialists.’ March 12, 2015.
  • Catholic Online. Milloy is an “A-list climate change denier.” March 15, 2015.


  • Linda S. Birnbaum, Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences & National Toxicology Program. Milloy has “obvious dedication to scientific integrity,” from a personal letter, June 21, 2012.
  • Jane Orient, Executive Director, Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. “[Milloy] has written so eloquently about rational risk assessment, debunked damaging myths,” from “Investing in Sin,” The New Republic (July 3, 2006).
  • Belle Monappa Hegde, renowned physician and former Vice-Chancellor of Manipal University (India). “[Science Without Sense is] A beautiful small booklet by a leading American epidemiologist, Steven Milloy…”, British Medical Journal, October 21, 2004. See also BMJ (February 1, 2001).
  • Marc Morano, “(Milloy is) the godfather,” from This Man Wants to Convince You Global Warming Is a Hoax, Esquire, March 30, 2010.
  • Dick Morris, Fox News commentator and political consultant: “Regardless of whether you believe global warming is a fraud, the fact is that the current depression, the past spike in oil prices, and the coming technology of electric cars are all going to solve whatever problem exists. Liberals want to use climate change as an excuse to take over the economy and regulate everything and this book exposes their plans,” from the back cover of Green Hell.
  • Penn Gillette of Penn & Teller. “(Silencing Science) is a way funny book written by heroes,” from the back cover of Silencing Science.
  • Rich Trzupek, “…Milloy is a hero. Using his website,, to deliver his message, Milloy has been a key soldier in the front lines of the battle to maintain the kind of healthy skepticism that is a critical component of scientific endeavor. It’s not overstating the case to say that Milloy, along with Climate Audit’s Steve McIntyre and Joe Bast’s Heartland Institute, laid the groundwork for an increasingly skeptical public to ask the tough, uncomfortable questions that are making global warming zealots squirm…”, from “The Heretics”.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “[] definitely provides ‘food for thought'”, from US EPA, Web Site Guide to Global Climate Change, July 1999.
  • Wikipedia. “Milloy has popularized the use of the term ‘junk science’ in public debate…” from Wikipedia entry for Steven Milloy.


George Monbiot, The Guardian.
 Steve Milloy is one of the “
Media Matters.
 Steve Milloy is part of the “
 A “
Kelly Rigg, Executive Director, Global Campaign for Climate Action.
Kevin Weiner, Director, National Education Policy Center
. “
 Amazed at the media attention the tiny Free Enterprise Action Fund was able to muster, Kanzer said, “What other $5 million investment fund is getting press? They don’t even have a ticker symbol.
Adam Kanzer, Domini Social Investments.
Steve Brodner/American Prospect.
 Milloy named one of the “
 No climate denier is “more dangerous than Steven Milloy… the disturbingly credible Steven Milloy.” (November 1, 2014)
John Ehrenfeld/The Blue Route.

Milloy at first the Wall Street Journal ECO:nomics conference, March 2008, with Kim Strassel (WSJ) and Mindy Lubber (Ceres)

Media Appearances, Speeches, and Other Activities
Mr. Milloy:

; CNBC’s Kudlow & Co. and SquawkBox; CNN’s Crossfire, Glenn Beck and Talk Back Live; CNNfn; CNN International’s Insight; MSNBC’s News with Brian Williams; FOX Business Channel’s Bulls & Bears, Cavuto, Dagen & Connell, Freedom Watch, Lou Dobbs, Money with Melissa Francis and Varney & Co.; FOX News Channel’s Glenn Beck, Fox Report with Shepard Smith, Fox and Friends, The O’Reilly Factor, Special Report with Brit Hume, Red Eye with Greg Gutfeld, and Your World With Neal Cavuto; 
; National Public Radio’s Talk of the Nation, the Glenn Beck Program, the G. Gordon Liddy Show, the Dennis Miller Show and many other national and local television and radio programs.
Has appeared on local, national and international television and radio including: ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings and Good Morning America; CCTV’s 
Was a 
 at the 
Wall Street Journal
‘s first ECO:nomics conference in 2008; and
Was the luncheon keynote at the 25th anniversary celebration of the National Association of Scholars. 
Steve Milloy delivers the C-SPAN broadcasted luncheon keynote address at the National Association of Scholars 25th anniversary celebration, March 2, 2013.

Junk Science! 2:24 min.

Fake News: Scientists Call Out New York Times For Incorrect Claim About Climate Report
Published on Aug 8, 2017
Scientists appear to have debunked The New York Times' claim it was leaked a secret, gloomy climate change report which it published amid fears President Trump would suppress it. On Monday, The New York Times published a story saying there are concerns that the Trump administration could suppress what’s known as the National Climate Assessment, a project of the U.S. Global Change Research Program. The story, titled “Scientists fear Trump will dismiss blunt climate report,” said the draft report “has not yet been made public” but “a copy of it was obtained by The New York Times.” The paper also said “those who challenge scientific data on human-caused climate change" are worried the report will be publicly released. But those who worked on the report are pushing back against the claims, saying the version that was obtained and posted in full by the New York Times has actually been online and available to the public for months.

“It's not clear what the news is in this story,” Robert Kopp, a climate scientist at Rutgers University who is listed on the report as among the lead authors, said on Twitter. Bob Kopp: “It's not clear what the news is in this story; posted draft is public review draft from Dec, and WH review hasn't yet missed Aug 18 deadline.” -- The Internet Archive, a website that archives content published online, says it downloaded the report from the Environmental Protection Agency's website in January 2017. Kopp noted the draft was published on the site during the public comment period, but then taken down after the period. But it still remained online at the Internet Archive's site. Bob Kopp: “The Times' leaked draft has been on the Internet Archive since January, during the public comment period.” -- “The Times' leaked draft has been on the Internet Archive since January, during the public comment period,” Kopp said.

Another scientist who authored the report, Katharine Hayhoe, a professor at Texas Tech who leads the school’s Climate Science Center, also emphasized that the report is already publicly available. “Important to point out that this report was already accessible to anyone who cared to read it during public review & comment time,” she tweeted. “Few did.” -- Katharine Hayhoe: “Important to point out that this report was already accessible to anyone who cared to read it during public review & comment time. Few did.” Hayhoe added: “Side-by-side comparison shows that @nytimes has public review version of our new climate sci report - so, no leak. It was available to all.” -- Katharine Hayhoe: “Side-by-side comparison shows that @nytimes has public review version of our new climate sci report - so, no leak. It was available to all.” -- Katharine Hayhoe: “The 3rd Order Draft of Climate Science Special Report is still available via the National Academy of Sciences Public Access File, on request.”

Hayhoe also said anyone who wanted access to the draft could still request a copy from the National Academy of Sciences. White House press secretary Sarah Sanders on Tuesday said the New York Times story is “disappointing, yet entirely predictable.” -- “As others have pointed out – and The New York Times should have noticed – drafts of this report have been published and made widely available online months ago during the public comment period,” Sanders said. “The White House will withhold comment on any draft report before its scheduled release date.” Kopp, the Rutgers University scientist, said Tuesday afternoon that The Times updated the online story to post a newer draft, the Fifth Order Draft, which is currently under review. A correction, however, has not yet been added. The New York Times story cites an anonymous scientist involved in the report as saying he and others are concerned the Trump administration would suppress the report.

“It directly contradicts claims by President Trump and members of his Cabinet who say that the human contribution to climate change is uncertain, and that the ability to predict the effects is limited,” The New York Times said. The story said that the National Academy of Sciences has signed off on the draft, but scientists are “awaiting permission from the Trump administration to release it.” But Kopp, one of the authors, pointed out in his tweets about the New York Times story that the White House hasn’t missed its August 18 review deadline yet. Several hours after publication of this article, a New York Times spokesperson returned an earlier request for comment to say the story had been updated.

Internet Archive: U.S. Global Change Research Program Climate Science Special Report
Fox News: Scientists Call Out New York Times for Incorrect Claim About Climate Report
People & Blogs
Standard YouTube License



We’ve been misled for far too long by the claim that vaccines are “safe and effective”

Dr. Stephanie Seneff | - AUGUST 15, 2017 117 Comments 



Glyphosate, often sold under the brand name “Roundup,” is the most widely used weed killer in the U.S.

Glyphosate is a “non-selective herbicide,” which means it kills many plants, not just weeds. It kills them by interfering with the production of critical proteins necessary for growth.

In commercial agriculture, Roundup is used on “Roundup Ready” crops—crops that have been genetically modified to resist the powerful toxic effects of glyphosate. The list of Roundup Ready crops includes soy, corn, canola and sugar beets. It is important to remember that, while these plants have been modified to resist the harmful effects of glyphosate, the people and animals that eat them have not.

It is important to remember that, while these plants have been modified to resist the harmful effects of glyphosate, the people and animals that eat them have not.

In a series of articles, my colleague Anthony Samsel and I have been exploring the connection between glyphosate and a number of diseases, including multiple sclerosis, autism, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer. In our most recent article, “Glyphosate Pathways to Modern Diseases VI: Prions, Amyloidoses and Autoimmune Neurological Diseases,” we present evidence that glyphosate has made its way into several widely used vaccines. We describe how the glyphosate residue contained in vaccines might induce the kind of autoimmune responses typically observed in autism.

Interestingly, of all the vaccines we tested, MMR stood out as consistently having the highest level of glyphosate contamination. This fact may help explain why the MMR vaccine, which contains neither mercury nor aluminum, has been implicated so often in vaccine injury and autism.

How Might Glyphosate Make Its Way into Vaccines?

Vaccines can become contaminated in many ways. One potential source of contamination is the animal tissue (chicken embryo, fetal bovine serum, monkey kidney, etc.) that is used as a culture medium to grow the viruses contained in vaccines. The measles virus for the MMR is grown on gelatin made from the bones and ligaments of commercially raised cows and pigs, animals that have been fed a steady diet of Roundup Ready corn and soy feed. Gelatin is also used as a stabilizer in vaccines, creating another possible route of contamination.

As Roundup producer Monsanto itself has reported, the residue from glyphosate tends to accumulate in the bones, marrow, and collagen-rich ligaments of animals. Anthony Samsel confirmed this finding in his own study of the bones, marrow, and other parts of pigs and cows, as well as the derived bovine gelatin.

To provide additional evidence that gelatin is the source of glyphosate contamination in vaccines, Samsel looked at a number of gelatin-based products, including Jell-O, gummi vitamins, and protein powders. He also looked at digestive enzymes such as trypsin and lipase. He found significant glyphosate residue in all of them. It should come as no surprise, then, that all of the vaccines that list gelatin and bovine serum as ingredients tested positive for glyphosate, while those that contained neither of these ingredients tested negative.

Glyphosate may be contributing to another source of vaccine contamination. In a recent study published in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, researchers were shocked to discover a variety of toxic metals in a number of common vaccines. Platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, and chromium all showed up in the MMR vaccine. The source of these contaminants is considered to be a mystery. It is interesting to note in this context that glyphosate was first patented as a pipe cleaner due to its remarkable ability to chelate metals. It may be the case that glyphosate is playing a role in extracting metals from containers during the manufacture of vaccines.

My research leads me to believe that synergistic toxicity between glyphosate and vaccines, particularly MMR, is a major factor in the growing autism epidemic. The severity of MMR-related adverse events, as reflected in the FDA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, has increased steadily in recent years—along with the use of glyphosate on corn and soy crops in the U.S. Some of the reactions that have become significantly more common after 2002 compared to before 2002 are seizures, anaphylactic shock, asthma, autism, eczema, irregular heart rate, and ear infection. Of course, correlation does not prove causation; it is important to understand how glyphosate residues might disrupt the body’s immune system.

How Might the Glyphosate in Vaccines Cause Autism?

In our recent article, Samsel and I describe how the measles virus in the MMR, which is grown on nutrients contaminated with glyphosate, could incorporate this glyphosate into its own proteins, as a coding error, in place of the amino acid glycine. Glyphosate is a glycine molecule with an additional methyl phosphonyl group attached to the nitrogen atom, and we have argued that a key mechanism of its insidious cumulative toxicity is its ability to substitute for glycine by mistake during protein synthesis.

Haemagglutinin is the main antigen produced by the measles virus that is responsible for inducing an antibody response to the vaccine. A glyphosate-contaminated haemagglutinin molecule from a measles virus will be much more allergenic than one that is free of glyphosate. When the measles virus from the vaccine gains access to the brain, the brain’s immune system acquires antibodies to this abnormal haemagglutinin molecule, and then, through molecular mimicry, these antibodies become autoantibodies to myelin basic protein, a basic component of the myelin sheath. This autoimmune attack on the nerve fibers in the brain disrupts neuronal communication channels, causing the symptoms of autism.

Vijendra K. Singh and his colleagues at Utah State University have published multiple papers, dating back to the 1990s, proposing that an autoimmune attack on the myelin sheath due to a viral infection may be a causative factor in autism. In their 2002 paper, “Abnormal Measles-Mumps-Rubella Antibodies and CNS Autoimmunity in Children with Autism,” they concluded that “an inappropriate antibody response to MMR, specifically the measles component thereof, might be related to pathogenesis of autism.” A paperpublished by Dr. William Shaw in 2017 discussed a set of triplets—two boys with autism and a girl with a seizure disorder—all of whom had high levels of glyphosate in their urine and a disrupted gut microbiome, which he proposed was a causative factor.

Gut Dysbiosis: a Primary Factor

Not all children will respond to a glyphosate-contaminated vaccine in the same way. A key factor that increases susceptibility of the brain to damage is an unhealthy gut microbiome, which leads to a leaky gut barrier and subsequently a leaky brain barrier, via a tight communication channel between the gut microbes and the brain. Prior chronic exposure to high levels of dietary glyphosate can set a child up for a severe adverse reaction to a vaccine. Dr. Andrew Wakefield, together with many colleagues, published a seminal article in the Lancet in 1998 on a case study of twelve children, all of whom had a gut disorder and all of whom suffered onset of gastrointestinal and neurological symptoms following MMR vaccine, with regression into an autism-like syndrome.” Parents of eight of the children cited MMR as the trigger for their child’s decline. Wakefield was among the first scientists to recognize the important role of a disrupted gut microbiome in the etiology of autism. Unfortunately, the Lancet paper was later retracted and other researchers were very slow to follow up on this important lead, although finally today an unhealthy gut is recognized as a key feature linked to autism.

Dr. Wakefield recognized that the children in his study suffered from a leaky gut barrier, as a consequence of damage to the lining of the small intestine. This lining is covered with millions of small projections called villi, creating a huge surface area for the absorption of nutrients. The cells that form these villi, called enterocytes, begin life as an undifferentiated stem cell in the “crypt” area of the intestines. From there, they proliferate and mature as they migrate up the walls of the crypt, and then settle in on the surface of the villi, where they absorb nutrients before dying and getting replaced by new arrivals in a constant renewal process, as illustrated in Figure 1.

Glyphosate, as an amino acid, is actively imported into cells along L-type amino acid transporters. Cells that proliferate, like enterocytes, express high levels of these transporters, and therefore preferentially take up glyphosate. In Celiac disease (gluten intolerance), the enterocytes are destroyed more quickly due to exposure to glyphosate and other toxic chemicals. This damage causes the cells to proliferate more quickly, in order to replace destroyed cells. Increased proliferation causes an increase in the uptake of glyphosate, creating a downward spiral.

Thus, glyphosate residue in food sets a child up to fail following an MMR vaccine. Wheat, barley, oats, chick peas, lentils, and sugar cane are not glyphosate resistant, but glyphosate is frequently used as a desiccant or ripening agent for them right before harvest, and it is actively taken up by the seed. Some of the highest levels of glyphosate have been found as a contaminant in these non-GMO foods, so eating “non-GMO” is not adequate for glyphosate avoidance. Glyphosate is not allowed in organic agriculture, so buying USDA certified organic foods is the best option. Children with autism often suffer from gluten intolerance, and I believe glyphosate is a major causative factor in both conditions.

Figure 1: Schematic of the enterocytes in the villi lining the walls of the small intestine, which migrate upward from the crypt to the villus as they mature into functioning enterocytes from initial stem cells. These cells are especially vulnerable to glyphosate toxicity, leading to a leaky gut syndrome.

A Lost Generation

We have been misled for far too long by the claim that vaccines are “safe and effective.” It is not at all clear that inducing specific antibodies to a small set of infective agents, such as the measles virus, while weakening the immune system’s ability to fight off all the other infective agents in the environment, is the best way to deal with infectious disease. As we have seen, antibodies can become autoantibodies and attack the body’s own tissues, leading to chronic diseases that are often worse than the infectious diseases they protect from. Vaccinated children suffer from many debilitating neurological and autoimmune diseases in far greater numbers than unvaccinated children. The manufacture of vaccines is a tricky process, and along with the acknowledged toxic ingredients like mercury, aluminum, and formaldehyde, they also have been found to contain contaminants like glyphosate and toxic metals that may well be the biggest contributors to severe adverse reactions.

As we have seen, antibodies can become autoantibodies and attack the body’s own tissues, leading to chronic diseases that are often worse than the infectious diseases they protect from.

Children today may already be a lost generation, but several policy changes need to take place in the immediate future to save subsequent generations from a similar fate. We need to repeal the 1986 legislation that protects pharmaceutical companies from liability when a child’s life is ruined by a vaccine. This will surely pressure them to try harder to keep impurities out of vaccines. We need to eliminate laws such as California’s SB277 that prevents unvaccinated children from enrolling in public or private schools, and be vigilant to ensure other states don’t follow suit. Then parents will be empowered to make decisions about the best path towards building a strong immune system in their child. Part of that program needs to be a switch to a 100 percent USDA certified organic diet, in order to protect children from the dangers posed by toxic herbicides, insecticides and fungicides. Finally, we need to insist that our elected representatives pass laws that protect consumers from products like glyphosate, which are designed to disrupt processes that support life.

Top 5 Reasons to Avoid Glyphosate Exposure

1. Glyphosate is a “Probable” Carcinogen
In March of 2015, scientists at the UN’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) declared glyphosate a probable human carcinogen. The IARC report linked glyphosate to non-Hodgkin lymphoma in humans and to cancer in laboratory animals, and indicated it can cause “DNA and chromosomal damage in human cells.”

2. Glyphosate is a Patented Antimicrobial Agent
Glyphosate disrupts the gut microbiome leading to the overgrowth of pathogens and inflammatory bowel disease.

3. Glyphosate Negatively Impacts the Brain
According to the National Pesticide Information Center at Oregon State University (NPIC), glyphosate exposure has been linked to developmental effects when administered to pregnant rats in high doses.

4. Glyphosate May Disrupt the Reproductive System

The Western world faces an epidemic in declining sperm quality.  The NPIC links high dose exposure in rats to negative reproductive effects.

5. Glyphosate May Be a Critical Factor the Autism Epidemic

Much evidence supports this, including disruption of the gut microbiome, chelation of important minerals like manganese and zinc, and extremely high correlations between time trends in autism and in the use of glyphosate on core crops.

This article originally appeared at the World Mercury Project.


Share this page