Free Ty Bollinger Kurs Okt 5-7, 2017

Free Ty Bollinger Kurs - Alternativno lecenje Kancera, pocinje Okt 5-7, 2017

-Odgledajte, i imajte svoj licni stav i misljenje. Odmah ispod, imate i kontra aurgumente za alternativan tretman raka.

Morate se registrovati da bi dobili FREE/Dzabe pristup 3 predavanja u roku od 3 dana. To ce biti u narednih par dana, i dobicete preko E-maila Temu, i kada ce biti i u koje vreme pojedinacno LIVE predavanje.  Kolko sam razumeo predavanje ce se odrzati LIVE iz New York-a po njihovom u 09:30 h , a kod nas u 15:30 h po nasem vremenu.

The Truth About Cancer Live 2017 begins on October 5th-7th and the live broadcast will begin with the opening ceremony at 9:30am Eastern.

Hey Vlada,

The other day, I told you that we’re going to do a LIVE internet broadcast of The Truth About Cancer Live event in its entirety.

But you have to register here to get free unlimited access.

You’re going to be able to watch it in the comfort of your own home on your computer, smartphone, smart TV, laptop or tablet.

This amazing event is bringing together 36 of the world's top health experts and healers all in one place to give you the information you need to PREVENT and even HEAL cancer.

And not only will you get to hear all the groundbreaking information the speakers have for you, you’re also going to hear from some cancer survivors.

You’ll hear from cancer survivors like Chris Wark, who was diagnosed with advanced cancer at just 26 years old, and how he was able to beat the disease without the use of toxic chemicals and chemotherapy.

This is truly an amazing story and you’re not going to want to miss it.

CLICK HERE to register and watch the LIVE broadcast for free.

Just like our live symposium in 2016, you’ll get the information you need to help yourself or a loved one and also hear some stories of how others have triumphed over cancer.  

The Truth About Cancer Live 2017 begins on October 5th-7th and the live broadcast will begin with the opening ceremony at 9:30am Eastern.

This is your chance to get the life changing and even life saving information you need and it’s 100% free.

I hope to see ya there,

Ty Bollinger

P.S. You can’t afford to miss this information. Please register today and mark your calendar for this amazing event.

Go here and register to watch TTAC 2017.





..."Još jedan koji se hrani ljudskom nesrećom i neznanjem." ili " Just wondering why anyone here on this thread cares so much that someone would pursue an alternative treatment. Are people planning to sue a priest who stands by a bedside to pray? Are people going to sue when someone asks for some words of encouragement? I'm pretty sure that the same people who are willing to sue and comment on all of these things are the same ones who should be minding their own business and not worry so much about the decisions other people make. Kind of silly that everyone spends so much time worrying about other people and the decisions that they make that have no effect on you. If it make someone feel better, who cares. Not everyone has to have the same beliefs now do they?"

“The Truth About Cancer” Series Is Untruthful About Cancer

Ty Bollinger has produced a video series he calls The Truth About Cancer: A Global Quest. It’s about as huge a misnomer as can be imagined.

Harriet Hall on November 17, 2015

The Truth About Cancer: A Global Quest is billed as “the documentary series the mainstream media refused to air.” It consists of eleven episodes and is produced by Ty Bollinger, an outspoken supporter of natural treatments for cancer. Episodes 1 and 2 are currently available online.

Ty Bollinger started his quest because several of his family members had died of cancer despite conventional cancer treatment. He believed they had died not of the cancer but of the cancer’s “so-called treatments” and “false treatments.” He doesn’t explain which cancers they had, what the treatments were, or why he calls them “false.” He was angry, and he wanted his relatives’ lives to matter; he thought he could give their deaths meaning by seeking out alternative treatments that would have saved them and could save others. He was an accountant and bodybuilder, untrained in science or medicine. He started out with the conviction that conventional cancer treatment was a fraud, and confirmation bias had a field day. Instead of learning about cancer from reliable sources, he avoided mainstream cancer experts and researchers and only interviewed alternative practitioners from all over the world who agreed with his premise. He eagerly swallowed everything they told him.

He says, “You are about to learn the best treatments and preventions to cancer, protocols that won’t harm your body, from the world leading doctors across the globe.” He promises to show viewers science and documented evidence. He promises to expose the lies of conventional cancer treatment. He thinks he has information that will eradicate cancer once and for all. He couldn’t be more wrong.

A hopelessly biased sample

The people Bollinger interviewed are not the world’s leading doctors, but infamous characters whose non-science-based views are notorious. I was only too familiar with many of the names: Matthias RathMike “Health Ranger” AdamsJoseph MercolaJonathan WrightRashid ButtarRussell BlaylockStanislaw Burzynski, and Tullio Simoncini. I will restrain myself and simply say these individuals are not reliable sources of health information. Others I was not familiar with, but they included “cancer conquerors” (patients with testimonials), journalists, chiropractors, naturopaths, integrative medicine practitioners, and operators of cancer clinics in Tijuana. He couldn’t have picked a more biased sample. He didn’t interview people like Siddhartha Mukherjee (the author of The Emperor of All Maladies), oncologists, or cancer researchers.

I have a rule, the SkepDoc’s Rule: before you believe a claim, make sure you understand who disagrees with it and why. Bollinger fails to do that. His mind is made up, and he is only willing to listen to people who agree with him. He asks questions like “Why would anyone prescribe poisons like chemotherapy?” but doesn’t consult the people who could answer and help him understand. He interviews patients who survived treatment with alternative medicine but doesn’t interview the families of patients who died.

False claims

He voices unsupported opinions and makes claims that can be easily refuted by a little research or even by common sense. Here are some of them:

  • The only thing that doctors are taught in medical school is how to prescribe drugs.
  • Professors are being paid by drug companies.
  • The Flexner Report, which reformed medical education in America, was a plot by Rockefeller and Carnegie to create a medical monopoly and eliminate all competition so they could sell more drugs.
  • “Anything coming from nature is excluded.”
  • The medical profession is a lap dog of the pharmaceutical industry.
  • Conventional medical has a monopoly on treatment: they make sure that insurance doesn’t cover CAM.
  • The number one goal of health care is to make money.
  • Saying they are making progress in any disease is only a propaganda war.
  • Business thrives on the continuation of existing diseases.
  • By 2020 more than half of cancers will be medically induced by drugs or radiation.
  • Nobody dies from the cancer, they die from consequences of the treatment.
  • Surgery spills cancer cells, radiation enhances them.
  • “It’s against the law in California for oncologists to recommend integrative.”

Lies about chemotherapy

He says chemo is incredibly ineffective and is such a hazardous material that nurses who administer it have to take precautions. If it’s hazardous to medical personnel, why give it to people who are sick? (There is a simple answer: because it has been proven to benefit those sick people.)

Chemo started with mustard gas. Yes, that’s true, but so what? The American Cancer Society explains the history of how observations of soldiers exposed to mustard gas led to an effective treatment for lymphoma.

He ask: “Why is modern medicine so drug-intensive?” My answer: because drugs have been proven to work. And because efforts to get patients to improve their health by lifestyle modifications are so often fruitless.

He claims that 97% of people who undergo chemo are dead in 5 years. That is absolutely not true. The study that claim is based on omitted all the types of cancer that chemo is most effective for, and it lumped chemo intended to cure with chemo used as an adjuvant or for palliation.

He perpetuates the lie that 90% of oncologists wouldn’t take chemotherapy themselves. That myth was based on another old study where oncologists were asked about an experimental chemotherapy regimen for one specific type of incurable lung cancer. The majority of them thought that the evidence available at that time showed that cisplatin and other experimental chemo drugs were ineffective and toxic. Keep in mind that lung cancer is not particularly amenable to chemo. A 1991 study in the British Journal of Cancer found that the majority of oncologists would take chemotherapy; for instance, 98% of oncologists would take their own medicine if they had stage IV Hodgkin’s disease, a cancer for which chemotherapy has been proven effective.

He claims that chemotherapy stimulates cancer stem cells. He interviews Blaylock, who seems to confuse embryonic stem cells with cancer stem cells. He says chemo has no effect on stem cells, only on daughter cells. After killing daughter cells it comes back “infinitely more aggressive.” When asked to explain, he says it’s complicated but has to do with chemistry and the micro-environment of the stem cell, producing cytokines that cause more DNA damage which makes the cancer more aggressive and more likely to metastasize. He can’t explain it because it isn’t true. Sayer Ji claims that chemo “enriches” cancer stem cells; there’s no evidence for that.

They claim that chemo harms every patient; it is referred to as “a suffering instead of a treatment.” They say that doctors who won’t prescribe it stand to lose their license. The tentacles of the medical cartel reach everywhere. Chemo causes side effects, which gives doctors a reason to prescribe more drugs and multiplies their business.

Matthias Rath says chemo is unethical and deceptive because it destroys the immune system and the immune system is needed to combat the cancer. He says doctors may not know better, but every scientist knows that chemo is a fraud, and if they say they don’t they should quit. (I know of doctors who think certain chemotherapies are sometimes used inappropriately, but I don’t know of a single reputable doctor or scientist who thinks chemo is “a fraud.”)

Breakthroughs in immunotherapy are misrepresented: immunologist and inventor A.J. Lanigan says “I don’t know that chemo has been successful at any level” except for making money. He sure doesn’t know much!

Rashid Buttar asks, “How is mandating chemo for children any different from Nazi Germany?” (Godwin’s Law strikes again!) It is trivially easy to answer that question, and it is grossly unfair of Bollinger not to interview anyone who knows the answer.

They say the FDA should be protecting us from chemotherapy drugs and other toxic substances but instead they are protecting the very industries that they were supposed to protect us from. FDA approval means proven safe and effective. Side effects discovered after marketing constitute fraud. (No, they constitute more information that becomes available when a drug is used by more people and people who are not as highly selected as the subjects in the clinical studies.)

The natural fallacy

Sayer Ji says studies show that turmericresveratrol, and green tea are superior to chemo. (Not true.) The drug companies supposedly ignore the evidence because they can’t patent a natural substance and prefer to make money by creating artificial ones. That’s just silly. The same companies that manufacture pharmaceuticals make plenty of money from vitamins and supplements. And they can take a natural medicine, isolate the active ingredient, improve on it, and patent their discovery; in fact, about half of our drugs were developed from plants through that process.

They cite problems with Big Pharma like ghost-written articles, studies where data were made up or manipulated, and corporate malfeasance of various sorts. These are things the medical establishment is well aware of and is trying to fix, with prominent projects like the All Trials campaign. But they go much further to demonize Big Pharma. Matthias Rath says Big Pharma companies were directly responsible for creating concentration camps and for the death of 60 million people. They wanted slave labor and put profits over lives. They created the system; later the Nazis decided to use it to kill Jews. Godwin’s Law again!

They say patent medicines do not belong in human bodies and that pharmaceutical medicine fails 97% of the time (demonstrably not true; every drug has to show evidence that it works before it can be marketed). Plant medicine is holistic, safer, more effective, and less expensive. Big Pharma can’t patent nature, so it tweaks molecule and it never works as well. “Can we, as mortal men, improve on nature?” (Emphatically YES, we can improve on nature, and we do. Their ignorance is appalling.)

War on nonconventional doctors?

Burzynski says the real war is being waged not on cancer but on unconventional doctors like him. He and Wright complain of being persecuted. They cite the Fitzgerald Report to congress in 1953 that supposedly revealed a conspiracy to close and destroy clinics, hospitals, and scientific research facilities that do not conform to the viewpoint of medical associations. It documented suppression of natural treatments, “and it’s in the Congressional Record!” Mercola claims information about laetrile was suppressed. It wasn’t. Laetrile was extensively investigated and shown not to work, so it was not approved by the FDA. This was no conspiracy: it was science in action, working to protect the public as the FDA is mandated to do.

They claim there is a conspiracy of the FDA, Big Pharma, and the AMA to suppress unconventional treatments. For instance, Royal Rife “knew there were microbes inside the cancer cells” and developed a machine that he claimed cured cancer by attacking the vibratory frequency of microbes. It wasn’t accepted by mainstream medicine (for very good reason!). Burzynski says there is merciless harassment of doctors who are inventors. He says he is saving people who would have died. He accuses the mainstream of obeying orders like Nazis. (Godwin’s law strikes yet again!) Buttar says it’s considered OK if patients die with chemo, but it’s not politically correct if they use CAM and survive. Tullio Simoncini says all new discoveries are shut down. “If you withhold treatment that can save someone’s life, isn’t that the same as murder?” Jonathan Wright claims a doctor in Alabama was treating cancer successfully with intravenous hydrochloric acid. He supposedly was visited by AMA and asked to sell his treatment and told if he didn’t he’d never be published again. He didn’t and he wasn’t. Harry Hoxsey’s cancer treatment allegedly worked. The AMA supposedly wanted to buy it and bury it. Hoxsey went to jail. Patients were loyal. The Hoxsey treatment is still available in Mexico. They use a formula that targets only the malignant cells, plus diet, vitamins, herbs, etc. The whole regimen takes one day.

The truth is that there is no conspiracy. The establishment would gladly accept any of those unconventional treatments if there were credible evidence that they did more good than harm.

Cancer survivor testimonials

Bollinger interviews a number of cancer survivors who have used alternative treatments. He doesn’t understand that the plural of anecdote is not data. He only looks at a few who survived; he doesn’t tell us about the many, many people who have died because they trusted unconventional treatments over proven treatments that would have saved their lives

For example, he interviews Chris Wark, “cancer conqueror.” David Gorski has put the record straight; Wark had curative surgery. He refused adjuvant chemotherapy that was not intended to cure but only as insurance to decrease the already small chance of recurrence; he was fortunate, and the cancer did not recur. He thinks he healed himself with diet and natural therapies. He didn’t.

The myths

Bollinger and the people he interviews subscribe to a number of unsubstantiated beliefs:

  • Natural is always best.
  • It is possible to prevent and cure cancer by lifestyle changes and natural remedies.
  • A healthy immune system can eliminate cancer.
  • Detoxification is necessary for health.
  • Conspiracy theories: the medical establishment is a totalitarian system that forces harmful treatment on its victims and is only interested in profits. “The so-called science, which is really just corporate driven fraudulent science, the so-called science-driven medicine is being forced on you in absolute violation of the AMA code of ethics, which says the patient must be informed and give consent.”

Episode 2

I started watching episode 2, about breast cancer and epigenetics, but I quit in disgust after only a few minutes. Angelina Jolie is criticized for letting “irrational fear” persuade her to get a prophylactic double mastectomy. She should have known that our genes do not control life. She could have deactivated her BRCA gene by diet and lifestyle. A chiropractor tells us that the BRCA genes actually prevent cancer and repair DNA damage, and they only mutate to cause cancer when people don’t live right. This amounts to denial of genetics and blaming the victim.

David Gorski is a breast cancer surgeon and researcher who knows far more about the subject than any chiropractor and he has explained the BRCA genes and Jolie’s case.

Dangerous misinformation

The Truth About Cancer is billed as a documentary series. It is not a documentary that tries to honestly present the facts, but a one-sided polemic, a vicious attack on conventional medicine based on misinformation, emotion, mistrust, and opinions that are not based on credible scientific evidence. It omits vital information, presents untruths and distorted partial truths, promotes natural treatments that have never been properly tested or have been tested and proven not to work, and it doesn’t give conventional medicine even the slightest chance to explain itself.

Conventional cancer treatment has cured some patients, prolonged the lives of others, and improved the quality of life for some of the ones who can’t be cured. It is ridiculous to talk about “cancer” as if it were one disease. There are many kinds of cancer, and the success rate varies. It is ridiculous to talk about chemotherapy without considering the type of cancer and the evidence for effectiveness, and without distinguishing between chemotherapies that are intended to cure and those that are prescribed as adjuvants, debulkers, or palliatives. We have seen incredible successes for many children’s cancers, and some adult cancers have been changed from a death sentences to a manageable chronic disease.

Bollinger doesn’t tell us about the patients who almost certainly could have been cured of cancer but who died because they rejected proven conventional treatments in favor of unproven natural treatments and outright quackery. He presents unconventional treatments as having been proven to work; they haven’t. If they had, they would be mainstream treatments and every oncologist would be using them.

Bollinger’s approach is as unfair as a trial where the prosecution is given carte blanche and no defense is allowed. This is a very unfortunate series, filled with misinformation but produced slickly, effectively appealing to emotion, and likely to mislead scientifically-naïve viewers and probably even some scientists who ought to know better. I predict that Bollinger will have blood on his hands: people will suffer and die unnecessarily because they believed this was “the truth about cancer” and were persuaded to reject lifesaving treatment.

Posted by Harriet Hall

Harriet Hall, MD also known as The SkepDoc, is a retired family physician who writes about pseudoscience and questionable medical practices. She received her BA and MD from the University of Washington, did her internship in the Air Force (the second female ever to do so),  and was the first female graduate of the Air Force family practice residency at Eglin Air Force Base. During a long career as an Air Force physician, she held various positions from flight surgeon to DBMS (Director of Base Medical Services) and did everything from delivering babies to taking the controls of a B-52. She retired with the rank of Colonel.  In 2008 she published her memoirs, Women Aren't Supposed to Fly.

November 16, 2015
November 18, 2015

© 2017 Paperback Theme by Array.

Kontra argumenti Medicinskom establismentu:

vidi #13 - The spontaneous regression of cancer - 


Prethodno Free predavanje od Cris Wark-a, koji je posle resekcije raka debelog creva u 4 stadiumu, preodoleo i izlecio se daleke 2004 godine.

Vrlo bitno!!! Hitno Delite dalje onima kojima je potrebno!!! Free kurs - ALTERNATIVNI TRETMANI RAKA- Na Engleskom, ima mogucnost Google prevoda. Dzabe 10 videa za pregledavanje samo ovaj weekend (72 sata)- od Petaka Septembar 29, 30, i do Oktobra 2, 2017 do 06:00 izjutra po BG vremenu, ili Okt 1-2017 po NY/USA vremenu. Savetujem svima koji kubure sa malignitetima, ili oni koji zele da se na neki nacin zastite od njih,  da odgledaju svih 10 videa, svaki je do 45 minuta duzine. Ovaj kurs se takodje nudi za kupovinu i kosta oko $ 180.00. Vodite svoje beleske, i vrlo je poucno za usvojiti ponudjene informacije. Isto tako daje se prednost prevenciji, pogotovu onima koji su izleceni od maligniteta, da nacinom zivota i ishranom, sprece recidiv bolesti.Toplo se nadam ca ce nekom od vas u etru, ova informacija pomoci u zivotu, Dr. VIS.

Isti free kurs je bio dostupan na internetu od 12 Sept - 21. Sept. 2017g. 

Sept 12th - Module 1: First Things First 

Sept 13th - Module 2: Why You Have Cancer & How to Eliminate the Causes

Sept 14th - Module 3: The Anti-Cancer Diet Part 1 

Sept 15th - Module 4: The Anti-Cancer Diet Part 2 

Sept 16th - Module 5: How to Detoxify Your Body & Your Environment 

Sept 17th - Module 6: How to Eliminate Stress & Heal Your Heart 

Sept 18th - Module 7: Spiritual Healing 

Sept 19th - Module 8: How Exercise & Rest Activate Healing 

Sept 20th - Module 9: Cancer Healing Herbs, Teas & Supplements 

Sept 21st - Module 10: How to Test & Monitor Your Progress    

So starting right now, ALL 10 Modules are back online for you to watch for a free Encore Weekend!

Whether you missed one Module (or all 10), or you just want to watch them again, the SQUARE ONE Encore Weekend is your chance to get caught up!

The Encore Weekend is LIVE right now and runs until Midnight on Sunday.

Whatever you do, please don’t keep this powerful information to yourself. Help me spread the message of hope and healing and SHARE the SQUARE ONE Encore Weekend with those you care about.

This isn’t being televised. It isn 't on Amazon or Netflix... The only way others are going to find out about this free life-changing program is YOU, if you share it with them. :)

Here's your link to watch (and share!):


Kontrargumenti Alternativnoj medicini #2!!!!

a) It wastes money
b) It wastes time
c) It's deadly if it's used as an alternative to real medicine for a serious condition
d) It's associated with antivaccination activism and rhetoric - which can actually directly harm me, thank you very much
e) It's associated with antiscientific rhetoric
f) It actively attempts to corrode trust in scientific medicine
g) It's made up of lies and dissembling and there is inherent value in truth
h) It oversells its interventions
i) It narrows choices by insisting one must do, say, yoga, rather than "any exercise"
j) It dumps patients in hospitals when the worthless "treatments" fail, sicker than they were when diagnosed
k) It can directly kill (perforated rectum from a "detox" enema gone wrong for example, or a cervical artery dissection from a neck manipulation)
l) Learning about nonsense takes valuable time away from real medicine in medical school
m) Funding research on nonsense takes valuable grant funds away from real medical research


 They aren't false claims. Reiki is effective. It is not a replacement for medicine. It is used in addition to and in some cases a patient with depression, anxiety, chronic pain can benefit greatly from the use of energy healing. It is astounding to hear intelligent people dismiss alternative approaches that have been used for centuries to assist in healing. Know your physics. There are studies and plenty of patients who will attest to the benefits of Reiki. Why do you think they return for more? Because they FEEL better!

Share this page